Regime shifts, thresholds and multiple stable states in freshwater ecosystems; a critical appraisal of the evidence

Sam Capon, Jasmyn Lynch, Nick Bond, Bruce Chessman, Jennifer Ann Davis, N Davidson, Max Finlayson, Peter A. Gell, David Hohnberg, C Humphrey, Richard Kingsford, Daryl Nielsen, James Thomson, K Ward, Ralph Mac Nally

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The concepts of ecosystemregime shifts, thresholds and alternative ormultiple stable states are used extensively in the ecological and environmental management literature. When applied to aquatic ecosystems, these terms
are used inconsistently reflecting differing levels of supporting evidence among ecosystem types. Although many aquatic ecosystems around the world have become degraded, themagnitude and causes of changes, relative to the range of historical variability, are poorly known. A working group supported by the Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (ACEAS) reviewed 135 papers on freshwater ecosystems to assess the evidence for pressure-induced non-linear changes in freshwater ecosystems; these papers used terms indicating sudden and non-linear change in their titles and key words, and so was a positively biased sample. We scrutinized papers for study context and methods, ecosystem characteristics and focus, types of pressures and ecological
responses considered, and the type of change reported (i.e., gradual, non-linear, hysteretic or irreversible change). Therewas little empirical evidence for regime shifts and changes betweenmultiple or alternative stable states in these studies although some shifts between turbid phytoplankton-dominated states and clear-water, macrophyte-dominated states were reported in shallow lakes in temperate climates. We found limited understanding of the subtleties of the relevant theoretical concepts and encountered few mechanistic studies that investigated or identified cause-and-effect relationships between ecological responses and nominal pressures. Our results mirror those of reviews for estuarine, nearshore and marine aquatic ecosystems, demonstrating that although the concepts of regime shifts and alternative stable states have become prominent in the scientific and management literature, their empirical underpinning is weak outside of a specific environmental setting. The application of these concepts in future research and management applications should include evidence on the mechanistic links between pressures and consequent ecological change. Explicit consideration should also be
given to whether observed temporal dynamics represent variation along a continuum rather than categorically different states.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)122-130
Number of pages9
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume534
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Nov 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Aquatic ecosystems
freshwater ecosystem
Ecosystems
aquatic ecosystem
Environmental management
Phytoplankton
macrophyte
marine ecosystem
environmental management
Lakes
Mirrors
phytoplankton
appraisal
Water
ecosystem
lake
water

Cite this

Capon, Sam ; Lynch, Jasmyn ; Bond, Nick ; Chessman, Bruce ; Davis, Jennifer Ann ; Davidson, N ; Finlayson, Max ; Gell, Peter A. ; Hohnberg, David ; Humphrey, C ; Kingsford, Richard ; Nielsen, Daryl ; Thomson, James ; Ward, K ; Mac Nally, Ralph. / Regime shifts, thresholds and multiple stable states in freshwater ecosystems; a critical appraisal of the evidence. In: Science of the Total Environment. 2015 ; Vol. 534. pp. 122-130.
@article{f648f7e5a4a74927b31b7ddd27f5a5e2,
title = "Regime shifts, thresholds and multiple stable states in freshwater ecosystems; a critical appraisal of the evidence",
abstract = "The concepts of ecosystemregime shifts, thresholds and alternative ormultiple stable states are used extensively in the ecological and environmental management literature. When applied to aquatic ecosystems, these termsare used inconsistently reflecting differing levels of supporting evidence among ecosystem types. Although many aquatic ecosystems around the world have become degraded, themagnitude and causes of changes, relative to the range of historical variability, are poorly known. A working group supported by the Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (ACEAS) reviewed 135 papers on freshwater ecosystems to assess the evidence for pressure-induced non-linear changes in freshwater ecosystems; these papers used terms indicating sudden and non-linear change in their titles and key words, and so was a positively biased sample. We scrutinized papers for study context and methods, ecosystem characteristics and focus, types of pressures and ecologicalresponses considered, and the type of change reported (i.e., gradual, non-linear, hysteretic or irreversible change). Therewas little empirical evidence for regime shifts and changes betweenmultiple or alternative stable states in these studies although some shifts between turbid phytoplankton-dominated states and clear-water, macrophyte-dominated states were reported in shallow lakes in temperate climates. We found limited understanding of the subtleties of the relevant theoretical concepts and encountered few mechanistic studies that investigated or identified cause-and-effect relationships between ecological responses and nominal pressures. Our results mirror those of reviews for estuarine, nearshore and marine aquatic ecosystems, demonstrating that although the concepts of regime shifts and alternative stable states have become prominent in the scientific and management literature, their empirical underpinning is weak outside of a specific environmental setting. The application of these concepts in future research and management applications should include evidence on the mechanistic links between pressures and consequent ecological change. Explicit consideration should also begiven to whether observed temporal dynamics represent variation along a continuum rather than categorically different states.",
author = "Sam Capon and Jasmyn Lynch and Nick Bond and Bruce Chessman and Davis, {Jennifer Ann} and N Davidson and Max Finlayson and Gell, {Peter A.} and David Hohnberg and C Humphrey and Richard Kingsford and Daryl Nielsen and James Thomson and K Ward and {Mac Nally}, Ralph",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.045",
language = "English",
volume = "534",
pages = "122--130",
journal = "Science of the Total Environment",
issn = "0048-9697",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Capon, S, Lynch, J, Bond, N, Chessman, B, Davis, JA, Davidson, N, Finlayson, M, Gell, PA, Hohnberg, D, Humphrey, C, Kingsford, R, Nielsen, D, Thomson, J, Ward, K & Mac Nally, R 2015, 'Regime shifts, thresholds and multiple stable states in freshwater ecosystems; a critical appraisal of the evidence', Science of the Total Environment, vol. 534, pp. 122-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.045

Regime shifts, thresholds and multiple stable states in freshwater ecosystems; a critical appraisal of the evidence. / Capon, Sam; Lynch, Jasmyn; Bond, Nick; Chessman, Bruce; Davis, Jennifer Ann; Davidson, N; Finlayson, Max; Gell, Peter A.; Hohnberg, David; Humphrey, C; Kingsford, Richard; Nielsen, Daryl; Thomson, James; Ward, K; Mac Nally, Ralph.

In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 534, 15.11.2015, p. 122-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regime shifts, thresholds and multiple stable states in freshwater ecosystems; a critical appraisal of the evidence

AU - Capon, Sam

AU - Lynch, Jasmyn

AU - Bond, Nick

AU - Chessman, Bruce

AU - Davis, Jennifer Ann

AU - Davidson, N

AU - Finlayson, Max

AU - Gell, Peter A.

AU - Hohnberg, David

AU - Humphrey, C

AU - Kingsford, Richard

AU - Nielsen, Daryl

AU - Thomson, James

AU - Ward, K

AU - Mac Nally, Ralph

PY - 2015/11/15

Y1 - 2015/11/15

N2 - The concepts of ecosystemregime shifts, thresholds and alternative ormultiple stable states are used extensively in the ecological and environmental management literature. When applied to aquatic ecosystems, these termsare used inconsistently reflecting differing levels of supporting evidence among ecosystem types. Although many aquatic ecosystems around the world have become degraded, themagnitude and causes of changes, relative to the range of historical variability, are poorly known. A working group supported by the Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (ACEAS) reviewed 135 papers on freshwater ecosystems to assess the evidence for pressure-induced non-linear changes in freshwater ecosystems; these papers used terms indicating sudden and non-linear change in their titles and key words, and so was a positively biased sample. We scrutinized papers for study context and methods, ecosystem characteristics and focus, types of pressures and ecologicalresponses considered, and the type of change reported (i.e., gradual, non-linear, hysteretic or irreversible change). Therewas little empirical evidence for regime shifts and changes betweenmultiple or alternative stable states in these studies although some shifts between turbid phytoplankton-dominated states and clear-water, macrophyte-dominated states were reported in shallow lakes in temperate climates. We found limited understanding of the subtleties of the relevant theoretical concepts and encountered few mechanistic studies that investigated or identified cause-and-effect relationships between ecological responses and nominal pressures. Our results mirror those of reviews for estuarine, nearshore and marine aquatic ecosystems, demonstrating that although the concepts of regime shifts and alternative stable states have become prominent in the scientific and management literature, their empirical underpinning is weak outside of a specific environmental setting. The application of these concepts in future research and management applications should include evidence on the mechanistic links between pressures and consequent ecological change. Explicit consideration should also begiven to whether observed temporal dynamics represent variation along a continuum rather than categorically different states.

AB - The concepts of ecosystemregime shifts, thresholds and alternative ormultiple stable states are used extensively in the ecological and environmental management literature. When applied to aquatic ecosystems, these termsare used inconsistently reflecting differing levels of supporting evidence among ecosystem types. Although many aquatic ecosystems around the world have become degraded, themagnitude and causes of changes, relative to the range of historical variability, are poorly known. A working group supported by the Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (ACEAS) reviewed 135 papers on freshwater ecosystems to assess the evidence for pressure-induced non-linear changes in freshwater ecosystems; these papers used terms indicating sudden and non-linear change in their titles and key words, and so was a positively biased sample. We scrutinized papers for study context and methods, ecosystem characteristics and focus, types of pressures and ecologicalresponses considered, and the type of change reported (i.e., gradual, non-linear, hysteretic or irreversible change). Therewas little empirical evidence for regime shifts and changes betweenmultiple or alternative stable states in these studies although some shifts between turbid phytoplankton-dominated states and clear-water, macrophyte-dominated states were reported in shallow lakes in temperate climates. We found limited understanding of the subtleties of the relevant theoretical concepts and encountered few mechanistic studies that investigated or identified cause-and-effect relationships between ecological responses and nominal pressures. Our results mirror those of reviews for estuarine, nearshore and marine aquatic ecosystems, demonstrating that although the concepts of regime shifts and alternative stable states have become prominent in the scientific and management literature, their empirical underpinning is weak outside of a specific environmental setting. The application of these concepts in future research and management applications should include evidence on the mechanistic links between pressures and consequent ecological change. Explicit consideration should also begiven to whether observed temporal dynamics represent variation along a continuum rather than categorically different states.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940435184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.045

DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.045

M3 - Article

VL - 534

SP - 122

EP - 130

JO - Science of the Total Environment

JF - Science of the Total Environment

SN - 0048-9697

ER -