Regulating Responsibilities

Income Management, Community Engagement and Bureaucratic Learning at Mapuru, North East Arnhem Land

Stefanie Puszka, John Greatorex, Gregory Williams

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    11 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The blanket implementation of income management in prescribed Indigenous areas under the Northern Territory Emergency Response (NTER) and in the absence of community consultation or negotiation processes, was informed by a view of community engagement as preventing action and failing to deliver outcomes. However, the outcomes of income management documented by the authors at Mäpuru, a homeland centre in north east Arnhem Land, demonstrates policy failure as a result of poor policy design and objectives inappropriate to the local context. Outcomes included centralisation, reduced food security and the perpetuation of disengagement and marginalisation. This paper discusses the ramifications of the NTER approach to policy formulation and implementation, arguing that this approach robs policymakers of important opportunities for bureaucratic learning and perpetuates a cycle of policy experimentation and failure. Community engagement, local partnerships and appropriate communications methods may lead to more appropriate and effective policy responses to issues in Indigenous communities.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)59-73
    Number of pages15
    JournalLearning Communities: International Journal of Learning in Social contexts
    Volume13
    Issue numberMay 2013
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    income
    responsibility
    management
    learning
    community
    land policy
    disengagement
    centralization
    Homelands
    communications
    food

    Cite this

    @article{1c264bf460d04165874cab2bdf7fdbe9,
    title = "Regulating Responsibilities: Income Management, Community Engagement and Bureaucratic Learning at Mapuru, North East Arnhem Land",
    abstract = "The blanket implementation of income management in prescribed Indigenous areas under the Northern Territory Emergency Response (NTER) and in the absence of community consultation or negotiation processes, was informed by a view of community engagement as preventing action and failing to deliver outcomes. However, the outcomes of income management documented by the authors at M{\"a}puru, a homeland centre in north east Arnhem Land, demonstrates policy failure as a result of poor policy design and objectives inappropriate to the local context. Outcomes included centralisation, reduced food security and the perpetuation of disengagement and marginalisation. This paper discusses the ramifications of the NTER approach to policy formulation and implementation, arguing that this approach robs policymakers of important opportunities for bureaucratic learning and perpetuates a cycle of policy experimentation and failure. Community engagement, local partnerships and appropriate communications methods may lead to more appropriate and effective policy responses to issues in Indigenous communities.",
    author = "Stefanie Puszka and John Greatorex and Gregory Williams",
    year = "2013",
    language = "English",
    volume = "13",
    pages = "59--73",
    journal = "Learning Communities: International Journal of Learning in Social contexts",
    issn = "1329-1440",
    publisher = "Centre for Research and Learning in Regional Australia",
    number = "May 2013",

    }

    Regulating Responsibilities : Income Management, Community Engagement and Bureaucratic Learning at Mapuru, North East Arnhem Land. / Puszka, Stefanie; Greatorex, John; Williams, Gregory.

    In: Learning Communities: International Journal of Learning in Social contexts, Vol. 13, No. May 2013, 2013, p. 59-73.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Regulating Responsibilities

    T2 - Income Management, Community Engagement and Bureaucratic Learning at Mapuru, North East Arnhem Land

    AU - Puszka, Stefanie

    AU - Greatorex, John

    AU - Williams, Gregory

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - The blanket implementation of income management in prescribed Indigenous areas under the Northern Territory Emergency Response (NTER) and in the absence of community consultation or negotiation processes, was informed by a view of community engagement as preventing action and failing to deliver outcomes. However, the outcomes of income management documented by the authors at Mäpuru, a homeland centre in north east Arnhem Land, demonstrates policy failure as a result of poor policy design and objectives inappropriate to the local context. Outcomes included centralisation, reduced food security and the perpetuation of disengagement and marginalisation. This paper discusses the ramifications of the NTER approach to policy formulation and implementation, arguing that this approach robs policymakers of important opportunities for bureaucratic learning and perpetuates a cycle of policy experimentation and failure. Community engagement, local partnerships and appropriate communications methods may lead to more appropriate and effective policy responses to issues in Indigenous communities.

    AB - The blanket implementation of income management in prescribed Indigenous areas under the Northern Territory Emergency Response (NTER) and in the absence of community consultation or negotiation processes, was informed by a view of community engagement as preventing action and failing to deliver outcomes. However, the outcomes of income management documented by the authors at Mäpuru, a homeland centre in north east Arnhem Land, demonstrates policy failure as a result of poor policy design and objectives inappropriate to the local context. Outcomes included centralisation, reduced food security and the perpetuation of disengagement and marginalisation. This paper discusses the ramifications of the NTER approach to policy formulation and implementation, arguing that this approach robs policymakers of important opportunities for bureaucratic learning and perpetuates a cycle of policy experimentation and failure. Community engagement, local partnerships and appropriate communications methods may lead to more appropriate and effective policy responses to issues in Indigenous communities.

    UR - http://www.cdu.edu.au/sites/default/files/the-northern-institute/lcj-13-may13.pdf

    M3 - Article

    VL - 13

    SP - 59

    EP - 73

    JO - Learning Communities: International Journal of Learning in Social contexts

    JF - Learning Communities: International Journal of Learning in Social contexts

    SN - 1329-1440

    IS - May 2013

    ER -