Relationally Reflexive Practice: A Generative Approach to Theory Development in Qualitative Research

P.a Hibbert, J.b Sillince, Thomas Diefenbach, A.L.d Cunliffe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In this article we explain how the development of new organization theory faces several mutually reinforcing problems, which collectively suppress generative debate and the creation of new and alternative theories. We argue that to overcome these problems, researchers should adopt relationally reflexive practices. This does not lead to an alternative method but instead informs how methods are applied. Specifically, we advocate a stance toward the application of qualitative methods that legitimizes insights from the situated life-with-others of the researcher. We argue that this stance can improve our abilities for generative theorizing in the field of management and organization studies.
Original languageUndefined
Pages (from-to)278-298
Number of pages21
JournalOrganizational Research Methods
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Hibbert, P.a ; Sillince, J.b ; Diefenbach, Thomas ; Cunliffe, A.L.d. / Relationally Reflexive Practice: A Generative Approach to Theory Development in Qualitative Research. In: Organizational Research Methods. 2014 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 278-298.
@article{f7c1b574b3ba40a5a0658cdbf78c2d6f,
title = "Relationally Reflexive Practice: A Generative Approach to Theory Development in Qualitative Research",
abstract = "In this article we explain how the development of new organization theory faces several mutually reinforcing problems, which collectively suppress generative debate and the creation of new and alternative theories. We argue that to overcome these problems, researchers should adopt relationally reflexive practices. This does not lead to an alternative method but instead informs how methods are applied. Specifically, we advocate a stance toward the application of qualitative methods that legitimizes insights from the situated life-with-others of the researcher. We argue that this stance can improve our abilities for generative theorizing in the field of management and organization studies.",
author = "P.a Hibbert and J.b Sillince and Thomas Diefenbach and A.L.d Cunliffe",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/1094428114524829",
language = "Undefined",
volume = "17",
pages = "278--298",
journal = "Organizational Research Methods",
issn = "1094-4281",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Relationally Reflexive Practice: A Generative Approach to Theory Development in Qualitative Research. / Hibbert, P.a; Sillince, J.b; Diefenbach, Thomas; Cunliffe, A.L.d.

In: Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2014, p. 278-298.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relationally Reflexive Practice: A Generative Approach to Theory Development in Qualitative Research

AU - Hibbert, P.a

AU - Sillince, J.b

AU - Diefenbach, Thomas

AU - Cunliffe, A.L.d

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - In this article we explain how the development of new organization theory faces several mutually reinforcing problems, which collectively suppress generative debate and the creation of new and alternative theories. We argue that to overcome these problems, researchers should adopt relationally reflexive practices. This does not lead to an alternative method but instead informs how methods are applied. Specifically, we advocate a stance toward the application of qualitative methods that legitimizes insights from the situated life-with-others of the researcher. We argue that this stance can improve our abilities for generative theorizing in the field of management and organization studies.

AB - In this article we explain how the development of new organization theory faces several mutually reinforcing problems, which collectively suppress generative debate and the creation of new and alternative theories. We argue that to overcome these problems, researchers should adopt relationally reflexive practices. This does not lead to an alternative method but instead informs how methods are applied. Specifically, we advocate a stance toward the application of qualitative methods that legitimizes insights from the situated life-with-others of the researcher. We argue that this stance can improve our abilities for generative theorizing in the field of management and organization studies.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84910060327&doi=10.1177%2f1094428114524829&origin=inward&txGid=326781bb6459a15eceeeb6787371d722

U2 - 10.1177/1094428114524829

DO - 10.1177/1094428114524829

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 278

EP - 298

JO - Organizational Research Methods

JF - Organizational Research Methods

SN - 1094-4281

IS - 3

ER -