Research for social impact and the contra-ethic of national frameworks

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    6 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Iteration is a factor of the human research ethical clearance through which research and evaluation with humans is undertaken in Australia. In remote community research contexts, iteration has helped us to redress some features of the cultural dissonance that occurs between western and Aboriginal research paradigms and between remote and urban contexts. Without a commensurate ethic of feedback between national programs and remote research settings, the uptake or non-uptake of findings from short-term or rapid-contract research often remain a mystery. The proposition this paper puts forward is for a post-research process whereby research commissioners and administrators provide feedback as to the uptake or not of research findings. This would produce a meta-data, as well as make accessible the rationale for research findings being accepted or rejected. The meta-data would provide baselines for further research, an ongoing record of areas of research and neglect, and assist in the uptake of research knowledge useful at a community level. However, this proposition would require non-partisan support which is highly unlikely to be realised in the current political climate.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)92-105
    Number of pages13
    JournalLearning Communities: International Journal of Learning in Social contexts
    Volume2018
    Issue number23
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Research for social impact and the contra-ethic of national frameworks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this