TY - JOUR
T1 - Rethinking third trimester ultrasound measurements and risk of adverse neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by hyperglycaemia
T2 - A retrospective study
AU - McLean, Anna
AU - Katz, Melissa
AU - Oats, Jeremy
AU - Wang, Zhiqiang
AU - Barr, Elizabeth
AU - Maple-Brown, Louise
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Background: Antenatal ultrasound is used frequently in pregnancies complicated by hyperglycaemia; however, it is unclear which measurements have the greatest association with adverse neonatal outcomes. Aim: To assess the association between third trimester ultrasound parameters with adverse neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by hyperglycaemia. Method: All pregnant women with gestational or type 2 diabetes who birthed in a regional hospital over 12 months were included. A composite adverse neonatal outcome was defined by one or more: admission to special care nursery, acidosis, hypoglycaemia, jaundice, shoulder dystocia, respiratory distress syndrome or 5-minute Apgar score < 5. Logistic regression was used to determine odds ratios (OR) for an adverse neonatal outcome, according to pre-specified cut points in both lower and upper percentiles of abdominal circumference (AC) and estimated fetal weight (EFW). Results: Of 275 births an adverse outcome occurred in 122 (44%). Unadjusted OR (95% CI) for AC ≤30th was 3.2 (1.1–8.8) and >95th percentile was 3.1 (1.5–6.0) compared with the reference group of 31–70th percentile. Unadjusted OR for EFW ≤30th was 1.5 (0.7–3.1) and >95th percentile was 3.0 (1.4–6.3). After adjusting for maternal age, body mass index, diabetes type, ethnicity, gravidity, mode of delivery and gestation at birth the OR (95% CI) were as follows: AC ≤30th percentile, 3.7 (1.1–12.4); AC >95th, 2.2 (1.1–4.8); EFW ≤30th, 2.6 (1.1–6.1); EFW >95th, 2.5 (1.1–6.1). Conclusion: An AC and EFW up to the 30th percentile may pose just as great a risk to the fetus as an AC or EFW >95th percentile in pregnancies complicated by hyperglycaemia.
AB - Background: Antenatal ultrasound is used frequently in pregnancies complicated by hyperglycaemia; however, it is unclear which measurements have the greatest association with adverse neonatal outcomes. Aim: To assess the association between third trimester ultrasound parameters with adverse neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by hyperglycaemia. Method: All pregnant women with gestational or type 2 diabetes who birthed in a regional hospital over 12 months were included. A composite adverse neonatal outcome was defined by one or more: admission to special care nursery, acidosis, hypoglycaemia, jaundice, shoulder dystocia, respiratory distress syndrome or 5-minute Apgar score < 5. Logistic regression was used to determine odds ratios (OR) for an adverse neonatal outcome, according to pre-specified cut points in both lower and upper percentiles of abdominal circumference (AC) and estimated fetal weight (EFW). Results: Of 275 births an adverse outcome occurred in 122 (44%). Unadjusted OR (95% CI) for AC ≤30th was 3.2 (1.1–8.8) and >95th percentile was 3.1 (1.5–6.0) compared with the reference group of 31–70th percentile. Unadjusted OR for EFW ≤30th was 1.5 (0.7–3.1) and >95th percentile was 3.0 (1.4–6.3). After adjusting for maternal age, body mass index, diabetes type, ethnicity, gravidity, mode of delivery and gestation at birth the OR (95% CI) were as follows: AC ≤30th percentile, 3.7 (1.1–12.4); AC >95th, 2.2 (1.1–4.8); EFW ≤30th, 2.6 (1.1–6.1); EFW >95th, 2.5 (1.1–6.1). Conclusion: An AC and EFW up to the 30th percentile may pose just as great a risk to the fetus as an AC or EFW >95th percentile in pregnancies complicated by hyperglycaemia.
KW - fetal macrosomia
KW - gestational diabetes
KW - infant low birth weight
KW - pregnancy in diabetics
KW - ultrasound
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099043423&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ajo.13281
DO - 10.1111/ajo.13281
M3 - Article
C2 - 33389751
AN - SCOPUS:85099043423
SN - 0004-8666
VL - 61
SP - 366
EP - 372
JO - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
JF - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
IS - 3
ER -