Returning to work following curative chemotherapy

a qualitative study of return to work barriers and preferences for intervention

Vikki Knott, Stephanie Zrim, E. Michael Shanahan, Peter Anastassiadis, Sharon Lawn, G Kichenadasse, Shawgi Sukumaran, Christos Karapetis, Bogda Koczwara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to explore barriers to return to work (RTW) and preferences for intervention and support for cancer patients treated with curative intent from the perspectives of cancer survivors and oncology health professionals.

Methods: Participants attended a focus group (N = 24) or an individual interview (N = 14). A topic guide and a semi-structured recorded interview format were used to gather data, which were later transcribed and analysed for global themes and subthemes.

Results: 
With regard to barriers, the global theme ‘work capacity’ captured an array of barriers encompassing financial pressure, preparedness for work, lack of confidence as well as other key physical, practical and psychosocial barriers. Participants expressed a preference for RTW models that focus on objective and structured assessment whilst allowing for flexibility to address individual needs.

Conclusions: Cancer survivors perceive multiple barriers when attempting to RTW. These barriers were perceived to impact upon work capacity, where ‘capacity’ was defined broadly to include practical, physical and psychosocial concerns. RTW is an important concern for cancer survivors and structured RTW interventions should be incorporated into the care of cancer survivors.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3263-3273
Number of pages11
JournalSupportive Care in Cancer
Volume22
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014

Fingerprint

Return to Work
Survivors
Drug Therapy
Neoplasms
Interviews
Focus Groups
Pressure
Health

Cite this

Knott, V., Zrim, S., Shanahan, E. M., Anastassiadis, P., Lawn, S., Kichenadasse, G., ... Koczwara, B. (2014). Returning to work following curative chemotherapy: a qualitative study of return to work barriers and preferences for intervention. Supportive Care in Cancer, 22(12), 3263-3273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2324-y
Knott, Vikki ; Zrim, Stephanie ; Shanahan, E. Michael ; Anastassiadis, Peter ; Lawn, Sharon ; Kichenadasse, G ; Sukumaran, Shawgi ; Karapetis, Christos ; Koczwara, Bogda. / Returning to work following curative chemotherapy : a qualitative study of return to work barriers and preferences for intervention. In: Supportive Care in Cancer. 2014 ; Vol. 22, No. 12. pp. 3263-3273.
@article{1406a53c70a1429bbb9a7b9cc9dc766f,
title = "Returning to work following curative chemotherapy: a qualitative study of return to work barriers and preferences for intervention",
abstract = "Purpose: This study aimed to explore barriers to return to work (RTW) and preferences for intervention and support for cancer patients treated with curative intent from the perspectives of cancer survivors and oncology health professionals.Methods: Participants attended a focus group (N = 24) or an individual interview (N = 14). A topic guide and a semi-structured recorded interview format were used to gather data, which were later transcribed and analysed for global themes and subthemes.Results: With regard to barriers, the global theme ‘work capacity’ captured an array of barriers encompassing financial pressure, preparedness for work, lack of confidence as well as other key physical, practical and psychosocial barriers. Participants expressed a preference for RTW models that focus on objective and structured assessment whilst allowing for flexibility to address individual needs.Conclusions: Cancer survivors perceive multiple barriers when attempting to RTW. These barriers were perceived to impact upon work capacity, where ‘capacity’ was defined broadly to include practical, physical and psychosocial concerns. RTW is an important concern for cancer survivors and structured RTW interventions should be incorporated into the care of cancer survivors.",
keywords = "adult, Australia, communication disorder, drug therapy, emotion, female, health personnel attitude, human, information processing, male, middle aged, needs assessment, Neoplasms, patient preference, psychology, qualitative research, return to work, Sickness Impact Profile, social support, survivor, Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Communication Barriers, Drug Therapy, Emotions, Female, Focus Groups, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Needs Assessment, Patient Preference, Qualitative Research, Return to Work, Social Support, Survivors",
author = "Vikki Knott and Stephanie Zrim and Shanahan, {E. Michael} and Peter Anastassiadis and Sharon Lawn and G Kichenadasse and Shawgi Sukumaran and Christos Karapetis and Bogda Koczwara",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s00520-014-2324-y",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "3263--3273",
journal = "Supportive Care in Cancer",
issn = "0941-4355",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",
number = "12",

}

Knott, V, Zrim, S, Shanahan, EM, Anastassiadis, P, Lawn, S, Kichenadasse, G, Sukumaran, S, Karapetis, C & Koczwara, B 2014, 'Returning to work following curative chemotherapy: a qualitative study of return to work barriers and preferences for intervention', Supportive Care in Cancer, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 3263-3273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2324-y

Returning to work following curative chemotherapy : a qualitative study of return to work barriers and preferences for intervention. / Knott, Vikki; Zrim, Stephanie; Shanahan, E. Michael; Anastassiadis, Peter; Lawn, Sharon; Kichenadasse, G; Sukumaran, Shawgi; Karapetis, Christos; Koczwara, Bogda.

In: Supportive Care in Cancer, Vol. 22, No. 12, 12.2014, p. 3263-3273.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Returning to work following curative chemotherapy

T2 - a qualitative study of return to work barriers and preferences for intervention

AU - Knott, Vikki

AU - Zrim, Stephanie

AU - Shanahan, E. Michael

AU - Anastassiadis, Peter

AU - Lawn, Sharon

AU - Kichenadasse, G

AU - Sukumaran, Shawgi

AU - Karapetis, Christos

AU - Koczwara, Bogda

PY - 2014/12

Y1 - 2014/12

N2 - Purpose: This study aimed to explore barriers to return to work (RTW) and preferences for intervention and support for cancer patients treated with curative intent from the perspectives of cancer survivors and oncology health professionals.Methods: Participants attended a focus group (N = 24) or an individual interview (N = 14). A topic guide and a semi-structured recorded interview format were used to gather data, which were later transcribed and analysed for global themes and subthemes.Results: With regard to barriers, the global theme ‘work capacity’ captured an array of barriers encompassing financial pressure, preparedness for work, lack of confidence as well as other key physical, practical and psychosocial barriers. Participants expressed a preference for RTW models that focus on objective and structured assessment whilst allowing for flexibility to address individual needs.Conclusions: Cancer survivors perceive multiple barriers when attempting to RTW. These barriers were perceived to impact upon work capacity, where ‘capacity’ was defined broadly to include practical, physical and psychosocial concerns. RTW is an important concern for cancer survivors and structured RTW interventions should be incorporated into the care of cancer survivors.

AB - Purpose: This study aimed to explore barriers to return to work (RTW) and preferences for intervention and support for cancer patients treated with curative intent from the perspectives of cancer survivors and oncology health professionals.Methods: Participants attended a focus group (N = 24) or an individual interview (N = 14). A topic guide and a semi-structured recorded interview format were used to gather data, which were later transcribed and analysed for global themes and subthemes.Results: With regard to barriers, the global theme ‘work capacity’ captured an array of barriers encompassing financial pressure, preparedness for work, lack of confidence as well as other key physical, practical and psychosocial barriers. Participants expressed a preference for RTW models that focus on objective and structured assessment whilst allowing for flexibility to address individual needs.Conclusions: Cancer survivors perceive multiple barriers when attempting to RTW. These barriers were perceived to impact upon work capacity, where ‘capacity’ was defined broadly to include practical, physical and psychosocial concerns. RTW is an important concern for cancer survivors and structured RTW interventions should be incorporated into the care of cancer survivors.

KW - adult

KW - Australia

KW - communication disorder

KW - drug therapy

KW - emotion

KW - female

KW - health personnel attitude

KW - human

KW - information processing

KW - male

KW - middle aged

KW - needs assessment

KW - Neoplasms

KW - patient preference

KW - psychology

KW - qualitative research

KW - return to work

KW - Sickness Impact Profile

KW - social support

KW - survivor

KW - Adult

KW - Attitude of Health Personnel

KW - Communication Barriers

KW - Drug Therapy

KW - Emotions

KW - Female

KW - Focus Groups

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Needs Assessment

KW - Patient Preference

KW - Qualitative Research

KW - Return to Work

KW - Social Support

KW - Survivors

U2 - 10.1007/s00520-014-2324-y

DO - 10.1007/s00520-014-2324-y

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 3263

EP - 3273

JO - Supportive Care in Cancer

JF - Supportive Care in Cancer

SN - 0941-4355

IS - 12

ER -