Returning to work following curative chemotherapy

a qualitative study of return to work barriers and preferences for intervention

Vikki Knott, Stephanie Zrim, E. Michael Shanahan, Peter Anastassiadis, Sharon Lawn, G Kichenadasse, Shawgi Sukumaran, Christos Karapetis, Bogda Koczwara

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Purpose: This study aimed to explore barriers to return to work (RTW) and preferences for intervention and support for cancer patients treated with curative intent from the perspectives of cancer survivors and oncology health professionals.

    Methods: Participants attended a focus group (N = 24) or an individual interview (N = 14). A topic guide and a semi-structured recorded interview format were used to gather data, which were later transcribed and analysed for global themes and subthemes.

    Results: 
    With regard to barriers, the global theme ‘work capacity’ captured an array of barriers encompassing financial pressure, preparedness for work, lack of confidence as well as other key physical, practical and psychosocial barriers. Participants expressed a preference for RTW models that focus on objective and structured assessment whilst allowing for flexibility to address individual needs.

    Conclusions: Cancer survivors perceive multiple barriers when attempting to RTW. These barriers were perceived to impact upon work capacity, where ‘capacity’ was defined broadly to include practical, physical and psychosocial concerns. RTW is an important concern for cancer survivors and structured RTW interventions should be incorporated into the care of cancer survivors.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)3263-3273
    Number of pages11
    JournalSupportive Care in Cancer
    Volume22
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014

    Fingerprint

    Return to Work
    Survivors
    Drug Therapy
    Neoplasms
    Interviews
    Focus Groups
    Pressure
    Health

    Cite this

    Knott, V., Zrim, S., Shanahan, E. M., Anastassiadis, P., Lawn, S., Kichenadasse, G., ... Koczwara, B. (2014). Returning to work following curative chemotherapy: a qualitative study of return to work barriers and preferences for intervention. Supportive Care in Cancer, 22(12), 3263-3273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2324-y
    Knott, Vikki ; Zrim, Stephanie ; Shanahan, E. Michael ; Anastassiadis, Peter ; Lawn, Sharon ; Kichenadasse, G ; Sukumaran, Shawgi ; Karapetis, Christos ; Koczwara, Bogda. / Returning to work following curative chemotherapy : a qualitative study of return to work barriers and preferences for intervention. In: Supportive Care in Cancer. 2014 ; Vol. 22, No. 12. pp. 3263-3273.
    @article{1406a53c70a1429bbb9a7b9cc9dc766f,
    title = "Returning to work following curative chemotherapy: a qualitative study of return to work barriers and preferences for intervention",
    abstract = "Purpose: This study aimed to explore barriers to return to work (RTW) and preferences for intervention and support for cancer patients treated with curative intent from the perspectives of cancer survivors and oncology health professionals.Methods: Participants attended a focus group (N = 24) or an individual interview (N = 14). A topic guide and a semi-structured recorded interview format were used to gather data, which were later transcribed and analysed for global themes and subthemes.Results: With regard to barriers, the global theme ‘work capacity’ captured an array of barriers encompassing financial pressure, preparedness for work, lack of confidence as well as other key physical, practical and psychosocial barriers. Participants expressed a preference for RTW models that focus on objective and structured assessment whilst allowing for flexibility to address individual needs.Conclusions: Cancer survivors perceive multiple barriers when attempting to RTW. These barriers were perceived to impact upon work capacity, where ‘capacity’ was defined broadly to include practical, physical and psychosocial concerns. RTW is an important concern for cancer survivors and structured RTW interventions should be incorporated into the care of cancer survivors.",
    keywords = "adult, Australia, communication disorder, drug therapy, emotion, female, health personnel attitude, human, information processing, male, middle aged, needs assessment, Neoplasms, patient preference, psychology, qualitative research, return to work, Sickness Impact Profile, social support, survivor, Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Communication Barriers, Drug Therapy, Emotions, Female, Focus Groups, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Needs Assessment, Patient Preference, Qualitative Research, Return to Work, Social Support, Survivors",
    author = "Vikki Knott and Stephanie Zrim and Shanahan, {E. Michael} and Peter Anastassiadis and Sharon Lawn and G Kichenadasse and Shawgi Sukumaran and Christos Karapetis and Bogda Koczwara",
    year = "2014",
    month = "12",
    doi = "10.1007/s00520-014-2324-y",
    language = "English",
    volume = "22",
    pages = "3263--3273",
    journal = "Supportive Care in Cancer",
    issn = "0941-4355",
    publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",
    number = "12",

    }

    Knott, V, Zrim, S, Shanahan, EM, Anastassiadis, P, Lawn, S, Kichenadasse, G, Sukumaran, S, Karapetis, C & Koczwara, B 2014, 'Returning to work following curative chemotherapy: a qualitative study of return to work barriers and preferences for intervention', Supportive Care in Cancer, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 3263-3273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2324-y

    Returning to work following curative chemotherapy : a qualitative study of return to work barriers and preferences for intervention. / Knott, Vikki; Zrim, Stephanie; Shanahan, E. Michael; Anastassiadis, Peter; Lawn, Sharon; Kichenadasse, G; Sukumaran, Shawgi; Karapetis, Christos; Koczwara, Bogda.

    In: Supportive Care in Cancer, Vol. 22, No. 12, 12.2014, p. 3263-3273.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Returning to work following curative chemotherapy

    T2 - a qualitative study of return to work barriers and preferences for intervention

    AU - Knott, Vikki

    AU - Zrim, Stephanie

    AU - Shanahan, E. Michael

    AU - Anastassiadis, Peter

    AU - Lawn, Sharon

    AU - Kichenadasse, G

    AU - Sukumaran, Shawgi

    AU - Karapetis, Christos

    AU - Koczwara, Bogda

    PY - 2014/12

    Y1 - 2014/12

    N2 - Purpose: This study aimed to explore barriers to return to work (RTW) and preferences for intervention and support for cancer patients treated with curative intent from the perspectives of cancer survivors and oncology health professionals.Methods: Participants attended a focus group (N = 24) or an individual interview (N = 14). A topic guide and a semi-structured recorded interview format were used to gather data, which were later transcribed and analysed for global themes and subthemes.Results: With regard to barriers, the global theme ‘work capacity’ captured an array of barriers encompassing financial pressure, preparedness for work, lack of confidence as well as other key physical, practical and psychosocial barriers. Participants expressed a preference for RTW models that focus on objective and structured assessment whilst allowing for flexibility to address individual needs.Conclusions: Cancer survivors perceive multiple barriers when attempting to RTW. These barriers were perceived to impact upon work capacity, where ‘capacity’ was defined broadly to include practical, physical and psychosocial concerns. RTW is an important concern for cancer survivors and structured RTW interventions should be incorporated into the care of cancer survivors.

    AB - Purpose: This study aimed to explore barriers to return to work (RTW) and preferences for intervention and support for cancer patients treated with curative intent from the perspectives of cancer survivors and oncology health professionals.Methods: Participants attended a focus group (N = 24) or an individual interview (N = 14). A topic guide and a semi-structured recorded interview format were used to gather data, which were later transcribed and analysed for global themes and subthemes.Results: With regard to barriers, the global theme ‘work capacity’ captured an array of barriers encompassing financial pressure, preparedness for work, lack of confidence as well as other key physical, practical and psychosocial barriers. Participants expressed a preference for RTW models that focus on objective and structured assessment whilst allowing for flexibility to address individual needs.Conclusions: Cancer survivors perceive multiple barriers when attempting to RTW. These barriers were perceived to impact upon work capacity, where ‘capacity’ was defined broadly to include practical, physical and psychosocial concerns. RTW is an important concern for cancer survivors and structured RTW interventions should be incorporated into the care of cancer survivors.

    KW - adult

    KW - Australia

    KW - communication disorder

    KW - drug therapy

    KW - emotion

    KW - female

    KW - health personnel attitude

    KW - human

    KW - information processing

    KW - male

    KW - middle aged

    KW - needs assessment

    KW - Neoplasms

    KW - patient preference

    KW - psychology

    KW - qualitative research

    KW - return to work

    KW - Sickness Impact Profile

    KW - social support

    KW - survivor

    KW - Adult

    KW - Attitude of Health Personnel

    KW - Communication Barriers

    KW - Drug Therapy

    KW - Emotions

    KW - Female

    KW - Focus Groups

    KW - Humans

    KW - Male

    KW - Middle Aged

    KW - Needs Assessment

    KW - Patient Preference

    KW - Qualitative Research

    KW - Return to Work

    KW - Social Support

    KW - Survivors

    U2 - 10.1007/s00520-014-2324-y

    DO - 10.1007/s00520-014-2324-y

    M3 - Article

    VL - 22

    SP - 3263

    EP - 3273

    JO - Supportive Care in Cancer

    JF - Supportive Care in Cancer

    SN - 0941-4355

    IS - 12

    ER -