Scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour

D Sims, E Southall, N Humphries, Graeme Hays, Corey Bradshaw, J Pitchford, Alex James, M Ahmed, A Brierley, M HINDELL, D Morritt, M Musyl, D Righton, E Shepard, V Wearmouth, R Wilson, M Witt, J Metcalfe

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    Many free-ranging predators have to make foraging decisions with little, if any, knowledge of present resource distribution and availability. The optimal search strategy they should use to maximize encounter rates with prey in heterogeneous natural environments remains a largely unresolved issue in ecology. L� walks are specialized random walks giving rise to fractal movement trajectories that may represent an optimal solution for searching complex landscapes. However, the adaptive significance of this putative strategy in response to natural prey distributions remains untested. Here we analyse over a million movement displacements recorded from animal-attached electronic tags to show that diverse marine predators-sharks, bony fishes, sea turtles and penguins-exhibit L�-walk-like behaviour close to a theoretical optimum. Prey density distributions also display L�-like fractal patterns, suggesting response movements by predators to prey distributions. Simulations show that predators have higher encounter rates when adopting L�-type foraging in natural-like prey fields compared with purely random landscapes. This is consistent with the hypothesis that observed search patterns are adapted to observed statistical patterns of the landscape. This may explain why L�-like behaviour seems to be widespread among diverse organisms, from microbes to humans, as a 'rule' that evolved in response to patchy resource distributions. �2008 Nature Publishing Group.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1098-1102
    Number of pages5
    Issue number7182
    Publication statusPublished - 2008


    Dive into the research topics of 'Scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this