Abstract
Unifying models have shown that the amount of space used by animals (e.g., activity space, home range) scales allometrically with body mass for terrestrial taxa; however, such relationships are far less clear for marine species. We compiled movement data from 1,596 individuals across 79 taxa collected using a continental passive acoustic telemetry network of acoustic receivers to assess allometric scaling of activity space. We found that ectothermic marine taxa do exhibit allometric scaling for activity space, with an overall scaling exponent of 0.64. However, body mass alone explained only 35% of the variation, with the remaining variation best explained by trophic position for teleosts and latitude for sharks, rays, and marine reptiles. Taxon-specific allometric relationships highlighted weaker scaling exponents among teleost fish species (0.07) than sharks (0.96), rays (0.55), and marine reptiles (0.57). The allometric scaling relationship and scaling exponents for the marine taxonomic groups examined were lower than those reported from studies that had collated both marine and terrestrial species data derived using various tracking methods. We propose that these disparities arise because previous work integrated summarized data across many studies that used differing methods for collecting and quantifying activity space, introducing considerable uncertainty into slope estimates. Our findings highlight the benefit of using large-scale, coordinated animal biotelemetry networks to address cross-taxa evolutionary and ecological questions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 586-602 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | American Naturalist |
Volume | 201 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Data were sourced from Australia’s Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS). IMOS is enabled by the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS). It is operated by a consortium of institutions as an unincorporated joint venture, with the University of Tasmania as lead agent. Quality-checked telemetry data used in this study were accessed via the Australian Ocean Data Network portal (https://portal.aodn.org.au/) and the IMOS Australian Animal Acoustic Telemetry database (https://animal tracking.aodn.org.au). We thank M. Braccini, R. Bradford, M. Davidson, A. Hobday, I. Keay, M. Lansdell, P. McDowall, S. Mountford, J. van den Broek, B. Walker, and J. Welch for their contributions. We thank S. O’Donnell and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful suggestions on the manuscript and C. Mull for advice during the reanalysis. We also acknowledge the contributions of all collaborators and their institutions to the contents of the IMOS Australian Animal Acoustic Telemetry database and data. This work was supported by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC; project 2018-091). Authors acknowledge the following grants and funding organizations that supported this research: ARC Linkage (LP110200572, LP0883720, LP10010036, LP120100652, LP150100669, LP110100712); ARC Future Fellowship (FT099172, FT100101004); ARC DECRA (DE120102459); NERP Tropical Ecosystems Hub projects 6.1 and 6.2; Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (2010/062, 2012/020); LabexMER (ANR-10-LABX-19); PRESTIGE program (PCOFUND-GA-2013-609102); Sea World Research and Rescue Foundation; Save Our Seas Foundation; Oceania Chondrichthyan Society/ Passions of Paradise; ECOCEAN; Winifred Violet Scott Estate; Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment; Ningaloo Whale Shark Industry; Caring for Coasts; Department of the Environment, Water and Natural Resources; New South Wales Department of Primary Industries; Sydney Aquarium Conservation; Neiser Foundation; Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management Board; Nature Foundation of South Australia; Tracking Research for
Funding Information:
Animal Conservation Society (TRACS); Australian Academy of Science; Thyne Reid Trust Doctoral Fellowship; Earth-watch Australia; Lady Elliot Island Eco Resort; Manta Lodge and Scuba Centre; Redland City Council; SE QLD Catchments; Kaufmann Productions; West Australian Marine Science Institution; Western Australian Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions; Gorgon Barrow Island Net Conservation Benefits Fund; BHP-CSIRO Nin-galoo Outlook Marine Research Partnership; Gas Industry Social and Environmental Research Alliance; and University of Queensland Research Scholarship.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The University of Chicago.