Self-reported harassment and bullying in Australian universities: explaining differences between regional, metropolitan and elite institutions

Timothy Skinner, D Peetz, G Strachan, G Whitehouse, J Bailey, K Broadbent

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    We analyse data from the largest survey of university staff in Australia to determine whether bullying and harassment are more common in regional than metropolitan and Go8 universities, and to what extent any differences could be attributed to other factors. While professional staff showed no difference in harassment rates between regional and metropolitan and Go8 universities, academic staff at regional universities reported significantly higher levels of harassment. This probably reflected the labour market and resource context of regional universities. Binary logistic regression indicated that a perceived lack of support for professional development partially explained the effect of regional status on differences in the rates of harassment/bullying across university types. Markers of organisational culture only partially account for differences in the rates of harassment/bullying between university types. � 2015 Association for Tertiary Education Management and the LH Martin Institute for Tertiary Education Leadership and Management.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)558-571
    Number of pages14
    JournalJournal of Higher Education Policy and Management
    Volume37
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Self-reported harassment and bullying in Australian universities: explaining differences between regional, metropolitan and elite institutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this