Socio-economic gradients in self-reported diabetes for Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians aged 18-64

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To examine and compare socio-economic gradients in diabetes among Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. Methods: I analysed weighted data on self-reported diabetes and a range of socio-economic status (SES) measures for 5,417 Indigenous and 15,432 non- Indigenous adults aged 18-64 years from two nationally representative surveys conducted in parallel by the Australian Bureau of Statistics in 2004-05. Results: After adjusting for age, diabetes prevalence was significantly higher among those of lower SES in both Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations. The age- and sex-adjusted odds ratios (OR) for diabetes for the lowest versus the highest SES group were similar for the two populations on many variables. For example, the OR for the lowest quintile of equivalised household income (compared with quintiles 3-5 combined) was 2.3 (95% CI 1.6-3.4) for the Indigenous population and 2.0 (95% CI 1.5-2.8) for the non-Indigenous population. However, Indigenous people of high SES had greater diabetes prevalence than low SES non-Indigenous people on every SES measure examined. Conclusion: Socio-economic status explains some but not all of the difference in diabetes prevalence between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. Other factors that may operate across the socio-economic spectrum, such as racism, stress, loss and grief, may also be relevant and warrant further examination. Implications: Indigenous Australians do not constitute a homogeneous group with respect to socio-economic status or diabetes prevalence, and this diversity must be recognised in developing measures to redress Indigenous health disadvantage. � 2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)18-24
Number of pages7
JournalAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Volume34
Issue numberS1
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Economics
Odds Ratio
Population
Racism
Grief
Population Groups
Health

Cite this

@article{0ce20cbcf1ce4325bd2e766ae20aaf21,
title = "Socio-economic gradients in self-reported diabetes for Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians aged 18-64",
abstract = "Objective: To examine and compare socio-economic gradients in diabetes among Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. Methods: I analysed weighted data on self-reported diabetes and a range of socio-economic status (SES) measures for 5,417 Indigenous and 15,432 non- Indigenous adults aged 18-64 years from two nationally representative surveys conducted in parallel by the Australian Bureau of Statistics in 2004-05. Results: After adjusting for age, diabetes prevalence was significantly higher among those of lower SES in both Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations. The age- and sex-adjusted odds ratios (OR) for diabetes for the lowest versus the highest SES group were similar for the two populations on many variables. For example, the OR for the lowest quintile of equivalised household income (compared with quintiles 3-5 combined) was 2.3 (95{\%} CI 1.6-3.4) for the Indigenous population and 2.0 (95{\%} CI 1.5-2.8) for the non-Indigenous population. However, Indigenous people of high SES had greater diabetes prevalence than low SES non-Indigenous people on every SES measure examined. Conclusion: Socio-economic status explains some but not all of the difference in diabetes prevalence between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. Other factors that may operate across the socio-economic spectrum, such as racism, stress, loss and grief, may also be relevant and warrant further examination. Implications: Indigenous Australians do not constitute a homogeneous group with respect to socio-economic status or diabetes prevalence, and this diversity must be recognised in developing measures to redress Indigenous health disadvantage. � 2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation.",
keywords = "Aborigine, adolescent, adult, age distribution, article, Australia, comparative study, demography, diabetes mellitus, economics, ethnology, female, human, male, middle aged, prevalence, risk factor, self disclosure, sex ratio, social class, socioeconomics, statistics, Adolescent, Adult, Age Distribution, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oceanic Ancestry Group, Prevalence, Residence Characteristics, Risk Factors, Self Disclosure, Sex Distribution, Social Class, Socioeconomic Factors, Young Adult",
author = "Joan Cunningham",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "18--24",
journal = "Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health",
issn = "1326-0200",
publisher = "Public Health Association of Australia",
number = "S1",

}

Socio-economic gradients in self-reported diabetes for Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians aged 18-64. / Cunningham, Joan.

In: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, Vol. 34, No. S1, 2010, p. 18-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Socio-economic gradients in self-reported diabetes for Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians aged 18-64

AU - Cunningham, Joan

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Objective: To examine and compare socio-economic gradients in diabetes among Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. Methods: I analysed weighted data on self-reported diabetes and a range of socio-economic status (SES) measures for 5,417 Indigenous and 15,432 non- Indigenous adults aged 18-64 years from two nationally representative surveys conducted in parallel by the Australian Bureau of Statistics in 2004-05. Results: After adjusting for age, diabetes prevalence was significantly higher among those of lower SES in both Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations. The age- and sex-adjusted odds ratios (OR) for diabetes for the lowest versus the highest SES group were similar for the two populations on many variables. For example, the OR for the lowest quintile of equivalised household income (compared with quintiles 3-5 combined) was 2.3 (95% CI 1.6-3.4) for the Indigenous population and 2.0 (95% CI 1.5-2.8) for the non-Indigenous population. However, Indigenous people of high SES had greater diabetes prevalence than low SES non-Indigenous people on every SES measure examined. Conclusion: Socio-economic status explains some but not all of the difference in diabetes prevalence between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. Other factors that may operate across the socio-economic spectrum, such as racism, stress, loss and grief, may also be relevant and warrant further examination. Implications: Indigenous Australians do not constitute a homogeneous group with respect to socio-economic status or diabetes prevalence, and this diversity must be recognised in developing measures to redress Indigenous health disadvantage. � 2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation.

AB - Objective: To examine and compare socio-economic gradients in diabetes among Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. Methods: I analysed weighted data on self-reported diabetes and a range of socio-economic status (SES) measures for 5,417 Indigenous and 15,432 non- Indigenous adults aged 18-64 years from two nationally representative surveys conducted in parallel by the Australian Bureau of Statistics in 2004-05. Results: After adjusting for age, diabetes prevalence was significantly higher among those of lower SES in both Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations. The age- and sex-adjusted odds ratios (OR) for diabetes for the lowest versus the highest SES group were similar for the two populations on many variables. For example, the OR for the lowest quintile of equivalised household income (compared with quintiles 3-5 combined) was 2.3 (95% CI 1.6-3.4) for the Indigenous population and 2.0 (95% CI 1.5-2.8) for the non-Indigenous population. However, Indigenous people of high SES had greater diabetes prevalence than low SES non-Indigenous people on every SES measure examined. Conclusion: Socio-economic status explains some but not all of the difference in diabetes prevalence between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. Other factors that may operate across the socio-economic spectrum, such as racism, stress, loss and grief, may also be relevant and warrant further examination. Implications: Indigenous Australians do not constitute a homogeneous group with respect to socio-economic status or diabetes prevalence, and this diversity must be recognised in developing measures to redress Indigenous health disadvantage. � 2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation.

KW - Aborigine

KW - adolescent

KW - adult

KW - age distribution

KW - article

KW - Australia

KW - comparative study

KW - demography

KW - diabetes mellitus

KW - economics

KW - ethnology

KW - female

KW - human

KW - male

KW - middle aged

KW - prevalence

KW - risk factor

KW - self disclosure

KW - sex ratio

KW - social class

KW - socioeconomics

KW - statistics

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Age Distribution

KW - Diabetes Mellitus

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Oceanic Ancestry Group

KW - Prevalence

KW - Residence Characteristics

KW - Risk Factors

KW - Self Disclosure

KW - Sex Distribution

KW - Social Class

KW - Socioeconomic Factors

KW - Young Adult

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 18

EP - 24

JO - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

JF - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

SN - 1326-0200

IS - S1

ER -