Stakeholder preference and stated vs derived importance satisfaction research

S.J. Greenland, I.A. Combe, A.M. Farrell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper presents a case study that reveals how stakeholders in the research process, by recommending specific data collection and analytical techniques, exert significant ‘hidden’ influence on the decisions made on the basis of market research findings. While disagreements among stakeholders regarding research design are likely, the possibility that strategies adopted by companies are dependent upon stakeholder research preferences has not been adequately addressed in the literature. Two widely used quantitative customer satisfaction evaluation approaches, involving stated and derived importance, are compared within a real-life market research setting at an international bank. The comparative analysis informs an ongoing debate surrounding the applicability of explicit and implicit importance measures, and demonstrates how recommendations are dependent upon the methodological and analytical techniques selected. The findings, therefore, have significant implications for importance-based satisfaction market research planning, and highlight the need to consider the impact of stakeholder preferences on research outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-56
Number of pages22
JournalInternational Journal of Market Research
Volume58
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Stakeholders
Market research
Analytical techniques
Comparative analysis
Planning
Research design
Data collection
Process research
Evaluation
Customer satisfaction
Outcomes research

Cite this

@article{2ebc239121a74fb9b65a13f65e56f531,
title = "Stakeholder preference and stated vs derived importance satisfaction research",
abstract = "This paper presents a case study that reveals how stakeholders in the research process, by recommending specific data collection and analytical techniques, exert significant ‘hidden’ influence on the decisions made on the basis of market research findings. While disagreements among stakeholders regarding research design are likely, the possibility that strategies adopted by companies are dependent upon stakeholder research preferences has not been adequately addressed in the literature. Two widely used quantitative customer satisfaction evaluation approaches, involving stated and derived importance, are compared within a real-life market research setting at an international bank. The comparative analysis informs an ongoing debate surrounding the applicability of explicit and implicit importance measures, and demonstrates how recommendations are dependent upon the methodological and analytical techniques selected. The findings, therefore, have significant implications for importance-based satisfaction market research planning, and highlight the need to consider the impact of stakeholder preferences on research outcomes.",
author = "S.J. Greenland and I.A. Combe and A.M. Farrell",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.2501/IJMR-2016-005",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "35--56",
journal = "International Journal of Market Research",
issn = "0025-3618",
publisher = "Market Research Society",
number = "1",

}

Stakeholder preference and stated vs derived importance satisfaction research. / Greenland, S.J.; Combe, I.A.; Farrell, A.M.

In: International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 58, No. 1, 2016, p. 35-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stakeholder preference and stated vs derived importance satisfaction research

AU - Greenland, S.J.

AU - Combe, I.A.

AU - Farrell, A.M.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This paper presents a case study that reveals how stakeholders in the research process, by recommending specific data collection and analytical techniques, exert significant ‘hidden’ influence on the decisions made on the basis of market research findings. While disagreements among stakeholders regarding research design are likely, the possibility that strategies adopted by companies are dependent upon stakeholder research preferences has not been adequately addressed in the literature. Two widely used quantitative customer satisfaction evaluation approaches, involving stated and derived importance, are compared within a real-life market research setting at an international bank. The comparative analysis informs an ongoing debate surrounding the applicability of explicit and implicit importance measures, and demonstrates how recommendations are dependent upon the methodological and analytical techniques selected. The findings, therefore, have significant implications for importance-based satisfaction market research planning, and highlight the need to consider the impact of stakeholder preferences on research outcomes.

AB - This paper presents a case study that reveals how stakeholders in the research process, by recommending specific data collection and analytical techniques, exert significant ‘hidden’ influence on the decisions made on the basis of market research findings. While disagreements among stakeholders regarding research design are likely, the possibility that strategies adopted by companies are dependent upon stakeholder research preferences has not been adequately addressed in the literature. Two widely used quantitative customer satisfaction evaluation approaches, involving stated and derived importance, are compared within a real-life market research setting at an international bank. The comparative analysis informs an ongoing debate surrounding the applicability of explicit and implicit importance measures, and demonstrates how recommendations are dependent upon the methodological and analytical techniques selected. The findings, therefore, have significant implications for importance-based satisfaction market research planning, and highlight the need to consider the impact of stakeholder preferences on research outcomes.

U2 - 10.2501/IJMR-2016-005

DO - 10.2501/IJMR-2016-005

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 35

EP - 56

JO - International Journal of Market Research

JF - International Journal of Market Research

SN - 0025-3618

IS - 1

ER -