Standardising English names for Australian bird subspecies as a conservation tool

GLENN EHMKE, JAMES A. FITZSIMONS, Stephen T Garnett

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Over the last 25 years subspecies have become an important unit of bird conservation in Australia. Some have evocative common English names which have allowed the subspecies to be vested with meaning among conservation advocates, evoking feelings of concern, loyalty and affection. This suggests that providing subspecies with stable English names can allow development of a ‘brand’ among those in need of conservation action. Also, since scientific names often change with knowledge of taxonomic relationships among birds, a stable list of standardised English names for all species and subspecies can minimise confusion and ambiguity among the public and in legislation. Here we present the arguments for creating a standardised list of English names for Australian bird subspecies and set out principles for formulating subspecies names, along with a list of the names themselves, with the aim of building the general public’s attachment to subspecies, increasing interest in their conservation and as subjects of research.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)73-85
    Number of pages13
    JournalBird Conservation International
    Volume28
    Issue number1
    Early online date26 Jan 2017
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2018

    Fingerprint

    subspecies
    bird
    birds
    laws and regulations
    legislation

    Cite this

    @article{e2f5c8ccdff54d6e8c7477b4097d5454,
    title = "Standardising English names for Australian bird subspecies as a conservation tool",
    abstract = "Over the last 25 years subspecies have become an important unit of bird conservation in Australia. Some have evocative common English names which have allowed the subspecies to be vested with meaning among conservation advocates, evoking feelings of concern, loyalty and affection. This suggests that providing subspecies with stable English names can allow development of a ‘brand’ among those in need of conservation action. Also, since scientific names often change with knowledge of taxonomic relationships among birds, a stable list of standardised English names for all species and subspecies can minimise confusion and ambiguity among the public and in legislation. Here we present the arguments for creating a standardised list of English names for Australian bird subspecies and set out principles for formulating subspecies names, along with a list of the names themselves, with the aim of building the general public’s attachment to subspecies, increasing interest in their conservation and as subjects of research.",
    author = "GLENN EHMKE and FITZSIMONS, {JAMES A.} and Garnett, {Stephen T}",
    year = "2018",
    month = "3",
    doi = "10.1017/S0959270916000538",
    language = "English",
    volume = "28",
    pages = "73--85",
    journal = "Bird Conservation International",
    issn = "0959-2709",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
    number = "1",

    }

    Standardising English names for Australian bird subspecies as a conservation tool. / EHMKE, GLENN; FITZSIMONS, JAMES A.; Garnett, Stephen T.

    In: Bird Conservation International, Vol. 28, No. 1, 03.2018, p. 73-85.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Standardising English names for Australian bird subspecies as a conservation tool

    AU - EHMKE, GLENN

    AU - FITZSIMONS, JAMES A.

    AU - Garnett, Stephen T

    PY - 2018/3

    Y1 - 2018/3

    N2 - Over the last 25 years subspecies have become an important unit of bird conservation in Australia. Some have evocative common English names which have allowed the subspecies to be vested with meaning among conservation advocates, evoking feelings of concern, loyalty and affection. This suggests that providing subspecies with stable English names can allow development of a ‘brand’ among those in need of conservation action. Also, since scientific names often change with knowledge of taxonomic relationships among birds, a stable list of standardised English names for all species and subspecies can minimise confusion and ambiguity among the public and in legislation. Here we present the arguments for creating a standardised list of English names for Australian bird subspecies and set out principles for formulating subspecies names, along with a list of the names themselves, with the aim of building the general public’s attachment to subspecies, increasing interest in their conservation and as subjects of research.

    AB - Over the last 25 years subspecies have become an important unit of bird conservation in Australia. Some have evocative common English names which have allowed the subspecies to be vested with meaning among conservation advocates, evoking feelings of concern, loyalty and affection. This suggests that providing subspecies with stable English names can allow development of a ‘brand’ among those in need of conservation action. Also, since scientific names often change with knowledge of taxonomic relationships among birds, a stable list of standardised English names for all species and subspecies can minimise confusion and ambiguity among the public and in legislation. Here we present the arguments for creating a standardised list of English names for Australian bird subspecies and set out principles for formulating subspecies names, along with a list of the names themselves, with the aim of building the general public’s attachment to subspecies, increasing interest in their conservation and as subjects of research.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010916985&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1017/S0959270916000538

    DO - 10.1017/S0959270916000538

    M3 - Article

    VL - 28

    SP - 73

    EP - 85

    JO - Bird Conservation International

    JF - Bird Conservation International

    SN - 0959-2709

    IS - 1

    ER -