Abstract
Over the last 25 years subspecies have become an important unit of bird conservation in Australia. Some have evocative common English names which have allowed the subspecies to be vested with meaning among conservation advocates, evoking feelings of concern, loyalty and affection. This suggests that providing subspecies with stable English names can allow development of a ‘brand’ among those in need of conservation action. Also, since scientific names often change with knowledge of taxonomic relationships among birds, a stable list of standardised English names for all species and subspecies can minimise confusion and ambiguity among the public and in legislation. Here we present the arguments for creating a standardised list of English names for Australian bird subspecies and set out principles for formulating subspecies names, along with a list of the names themselves, with the aim of building the general public’s attachment to subspecies, increasing interest in their conservation and as subjects of research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 73-85 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Bird Conservation International |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 26 Jan 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Standardising English names for Australian bird subspecies as a conservation tool'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver