Strengths and limitations of a tool for monitoring and evaluating First Peoples' health promotion from an ecological perspective

Kevin Rowley, J Doyle, L Johnston, Rachel Reilly, Leisa Mccarthy, M Marika, T Riley, P Atkinson, B Firebrace, J Calleja, Margaret Cargo

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    4 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background: An ecological approach to health and health promotion targets individuals and the environmental determinants of their health as a means of more effectively influencing health outcomes. The approach has potential value as a means to more accurately capture the holistic nature of Australian First Peoples' health programs and the way in which they seek to influence environmental, including social, determinants of health.

    Methods: We report several case studies of applying an ecological approach to health program evaluation using a tool developed for application to mainstream public health programs in North America - Richard's ecological coding procedure.

    Results: We find the ecological approach in general, and the Richard procedure specifically, to have potential for broader use as an approach to reporting and evaluation of health promotion programs. However, our experience applying this tool in academic and community-based program evaluation contexts, conducted in collaboration with First Peoples of Australia, suggests that it would benefit from cultural adaptations that would bring the ecological coding procedure in greater alignment with the worldviews of First Peoples and better identify the aims and strategies of local health promotion programs.

    Conclusions: Establishing the cultural validity of the ecological coding procedure is necessary to adequately capture the underlying program activities of community-based health promotion programs designed to benefit First Peoples, and its collaborative implementation with First Peoples supports a human rights approach to health program evaluation.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number1215
    Pages (from-to)1-9
    Number of pages9
    JournalBMC Public Health
    Volume15
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 8 Dec 2015

    Fingerprint

    Health Promotion
    Program Evaluation
    Health
    Social Determinants of Health
    North America
    Public Health

    Cite this

    Rowley, Kevin ; Doyle, J ; Johnston, L ; Reilly, Rachel ; Mccarthy, Leisa ; Marika, M ; Riley, T ; Atkinson, P ; Firebrace, B ; Calleja, J ; Cargo, Margaret. / Strengths and limitations of a tool for monitoring and evaluating First Peoples' health promotion from an ecological perspective. In: BMC Public Health. 2015 ; Vol. 15. pp. 1-9.
    @article{93a5a864bbba4834a41538a05e04a440,
    title = "Strengths and limitations of a tool for monitoring and evaluating First Peoples' health promotion from an ecological perspective",
    abstract = "Background: An ecological approach to health and health promotion targets individuals and the environmental determinants of their health as a means of more effectively influencing health outcomes. The approach has potential value as a means to more accurately capture the holistic nature of Australian First Peoples' health programs and the way in which they seek to influence environmental, including social, determinants of health. Methods: We report several case studies of applying an ecological approach to health program evaluation using a tool developed for application to mainstream public health programs in North America - Richard's ecological coding procedure. Results: We find the ecological approach in general, and the Richard procedure specifically, to have potential for broader use as an approach to reporting and evaluation of health promotion programs. However, our experience applying this tool in academic and community-based program evaluation contexts, conducted in collaboration with First Peoples of Australia, suggests that it would benefit from cultural adaptations that would bring the ecological coding procedure in greater alignment with the worldviews of First Peoples and better identify the aims and strategies of local health promotion programs. Conclusions: Establishing the cultural validity of the ecological coding procedure is necessary to adequately capture the underlying program activities of community-based health promotion programs designed to benefit First Peoples, and its collaborative implementation with First Peoples supports a human rights approach to health program evaluation.",
    author = "Kevin Rowley and J Doyle and L Johnston and Rachel Reilly and Leisa Mccarthy and M Marika and T Riley and P Atkinson and B Firebrace and J Calleja and Margaret Cargo",
    year = "2015",
    month = "12",
    day = "8",
    doi = "10.1186/s12889-015-2550-3",
    language = "English",
    volume = "15",
    pages = "1--9",
    journal = "BMC Public Health",
    issn = "1471-2458",
    publisher = "BioMed Central",

    }

    Rowley, K, Doyle, J, Johnston, L, Reilly, R, Mccarthy, L, Marika, M, Riley, T, Atkinson, P, Firebrace, B, Calleja, J & Cargo, M 2015, 'Strengths and limitations of a tool for monitoring and evaluating First Peoples' health promotion from an ecological perspective', BMC Public Health, vol. 15, 1215, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2550-3

    Strengths and limitations of a tool for monitoring and evaluating First Peoples' health promotion from an ecological perspective. / Rowley, Kevin; Doyle, J; Johnston, L; Reilly, Rachel; Mccarthy, Leisa; Marika, M; Riley, T; Atkinson, P; Firebrace, B; Calleja, J; Cargo, Margaret.

    In: BMC Public Health, Vol. 15, 1215, 08.12.2015, p. 1-9.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Strengths and limitations of a tool for monitoring and evaluating First Peoples' health promotion from an ecological perspective

    AU - Rowley, Kevin

    AU - Doyle, J

    AU - Johnston, L

    AU - Reilly, Rachel

    AU - Mccarthy, Leisa

    AU - Marika, M

    AU - Riley, T

    AU - Atkinson, P

    AU - Firebrace, B

    AU - Calleja, J

    AU - Cargo, Margaret

    PY - 2015/12/8

    Y1 - 2015/12/8

    N2 - Background: An ecological approach to health and health promotion targets individuals and the environmental determinants of their health as a means of more effectively influencing health outcomes. The approach has potential value as a means to more accurately capture the holistic nature of Australian First Peoples' health programs and the way in which they seek to influence environmental, including social, determinants of health. Methods: We report several case studies of applying an ecological approach to health program evaluation using a tool developed for application to mainstream public health programs in North America - Richard's ecological coding procedure. Results: We find the ecological approach in general, and the Richard procedure specifically, to have potential for broader use as an approach to reporting and evaluation of health promotion programs. However, our experience applying this tool in academic and community-based program evaluation contexts, conducted in collaboration with First Peoples of Australia, suggests that it would benefit from cultural adaptations that would bring the ecological coding procedure in greater alignment with the worldviews of First Peoples and better identify the aims and strategies of local health promotion programs. Conclusions: Establishing the cultural validity of the ecological coding procedure is necessary to adequately capture the underlying program activities of community-based health promotion programs designed to benefit First Peoples, and its collaborative implementation with First Peoples supports a human rights approach to health program evaluation.

    AB - Background: An ecological approach to health and health promotion targets individuals and the environmental determinants of their health as a means of more effectively influencing health outcomes. The approach has potential value as a means to more accurately capture the holistic nature of Australian First Peoples' health programs and the way in which they seek to influence environmental, including social, determinants of health. Methods: We report several case studies of applying an ecological approach to health program evaluation using a tool developed for application to mainstream public health programs in North America - Richard's ecological coding procedure. Results: We find the ecological approach in general, and the Richard procedure specifically, to have potential for broader use as an approach to reporting and evaluation of health promotion programs. However, our experience applying this tool in academic and community-based program evaluation contexts, conducted in collaboration with First Peoples of Australia, suggests that it would benefit from cultural adaptations that would bring the ecological coding procedure in greater alignment with the worldviews of First Peoples and better identify the aims and strategies of local health promotion programs. Conclusions: Establishing the cultural validity of the ecological coding procedure is necessary to adequately capture the underlying program activities of community-based health promotion programs designed to benefit First Peoples, and its collaborative implementation with First Peoples supports a human rights approach to health program evaluation.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949254706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1186/s12889-015-2550-3

    DO - 10.1186/s12889-015-2550-3

    M3 - Article

    VL - 15

    SP - 1

    EP - 9

    JO - BMC Public Health

    JF - BMC Public Health

    SN - 1471-2458

    M1 - 1215

    ER -