Surgical safety checklists:

a review

Reuben Tang, Geetha Ranmuthugala, Frances Cunningham

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Background: Surgical checklists are designed to improve patient outcomes following surgery. While such checklists have been widely implemented worldwide, few studies examine surgical checklists within an Australian context. For this purpose, we have performed a literature review using data from OECD member nations to determine the effectiveness of surgical checklists in improving patient outcomes and factors that contribute to their successful implementation. 

    Method: The databases, Pubmed, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and CINAHL were searched using the keywords ('surgical' AND 'checklist') and ((surgical) AND checklist) AND ((implementation) OR (utilization) OR (usage)). Studies were limited to those written in the English language, peer-reviewed, published between January 2000 and December 2012, and including an abstract.

    Results: Our search yielded 2242 papers, of which 72 papers were identified for their potential relevance and selected for full text review. Of these, nine papers met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed in detail. Evidence that supports the use of surgical checklists in countries with a large number of protocols already in place is limited. Adequate checklist implementation plays a central role in checklist effectiveness, which in turn is dependent on multiple factors. 

    Conclusion: Although evidence from OECD member countries is non-conclusive, it does suggest that surgical checklists, when effectively implemented, have the potential to be effective at reducing complication and mortality rates following surgery. Within an Australian context, more studies are needed to fully establish the potential effectiveness of surgical checklists and to monitor checklist use compliance in order to ensure greater patient safety. 

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)148-154
    Number of pages7
    JournalANZ Journal of Surgery
    Volume84
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014

    Fingerprint

    Checklist
    Safety
    Patient Safety
    PubMed
    Compliance
    Language
    Databases
    Mortality

    Cite this

    Tang, Reuben ; Ranmuthugala, Geetha ; Cunningham, Frances. / Surgical safety checklists: a review. In: ANZ Journal of Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 84, No. 3. pp. 148-154.
    @article{20c9350e388844eab66ef65db8414b88,
    title = "Surgical safety checklists:: a review",
    abstract = "Background: Surgical checklists are designed to improve patient outcomes following surgery. While such checklists have been widely implemented worldwide, few studies examine surgical checklists within an Australian context. For this purpose, we have performed a literature review using data from OECD member nations to determine the effectiveness of surgical checklists in improving patient outcomes and factors that contribute to their successful implementation. Method: The databases, Pubmed, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and CINAHL were searched using the keywords ('surgical' AND 'checklist') and ((surgical) AND checklist) AND ((implementation) OR (utilization) OR (usage)). Studies were limited to those written in the English language, peer-reviewed, published between January 2000 and December 2012, and including an abstract.Results: Our search yielded 2242 papers, of which 72 papers were identified for their potential relevance and selected for full text review. Of these, nine papers met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed in detail. Evidence that supports the use of surgical checklists in countries with a large number of protocols already in place is limited. Adequate checklist implementation plays a central role in checklist effectiveness, which in turn is dependent on multiple factors. Conclusion: Although evidence from OECD member countries is non-conclusive, it does suggest that surgical checklists, when effectively implemented, have the potential to be effective at reducing complication and mortality rates following surgery. Within an Australian context, more studies are needed to fully establish the potential effectiveness of surgical checklists and to monitor checklist use compliance in order to ensure greater patient safety. ",
    keywords = "article, checklist, health care quality, health services research, human, patient safety, practice guideline, quality assurance health care, standard, surgery, treatment outcome, guideline adherence, quality of health care, Checklist, Humans, Patient Safety, Surgical Procedures, Operative, Treatment Outcome",
    author = "Reuben Tang and Geetha Ranmuthugala and Frances Cunningham",
    year = "2014",
    month = "3",
    doi = "10.1111/ans.12168",
    language = "English",
    volume = "84",
    pages = "148--154",
    journal = "ANZ Journal of Surgery",
    issn = "1445-1433",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "3",

    }

    Surgical safety checklists: a review. / Tang, Reuben; Ranmuthugala, Geetha; Cunningham, Frances.

    In: ANZ Journal of Surgery, Vol. 84, No. 3, 03.2014, p. 148-154.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Surgical safety checklists:

    T2 - a review

    AU - Tang, Reuben

    AU - Ranmuthugala, Geetha

    AU - Cunningham, Frances

    PY - 2014/3

    Y1 - 2014/3

    N2 - Background: Surgical checklists are designed to improve patient outcomes following surgery. While such checklists have been widely implemented worldwide, few studies examine surgical checklists within an Australian context. For this purpose, we have performed a literature review using data from OECD member nations to determine the effectiveness of surgical checklists in improving patient outcomes and factors that contribute to their successful implementation. Method: The databases, Pubmed, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and CINAHL were searched using the keywords ('surgical' AND 'checklist') and ((surgical) AND checklist) AND ((implementation) OR (utilization) OR (usage)). Studies were limited to those written in the English language, peer-reviewed, published between January 2000 and December 2012, and including an abstract.Results: Our search yielded 2242 papers, of which 72 papers were identified for their potential relevance and selected for full text review. Of these, nine papers met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed in detail. Evidence that supports the use of surgical checklists in countries with a large number of protocols already in place is limited. Adequate checklist implementation plays a central role in checklist effectiveness, which in turn is dependent on multiple factors. Conclusion: Although evidence from OECD member countries is non-conclusive, it does suggest that surgical checklists, when effectively implemented, have the potential to be effective at reducing complication and mortality rates following surgery. Within an Australian context, more studies are needed to fully establish the potential effectiveness of surgical checklists and to monitor checklist use compliance in order to ensure greater patient safety. 

    AB - Background: Surgical checklists are designed to improve patient outcomes following surgery. While such checklists have been widely implemented worldwide, few studies examine surgical checklists within an Australian context. For this purpose, we have performed a literature review using data from OECD member nations to determine the effectiveness of surgical checklists in improving patient outcomes and factors that contribute to their successful implementation. Method: The databases, Pubmed, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and CINAHL were searched using the keywords ('surgical' AND 'checklist') and ((surgical) AND checklist) AND ((implementation) OR (utilization) OR (usage)). Studies were limited to those written in the English language, peer-reviewed, published between January 2000 and December 2012, and including an abstract.Results: Our search yielded 2242 papers, of which 72 papers were identified for their potential relevance and selected for full text review. Of these, nine papers met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed in detail. Evidence that supports the use of surgical checklists in countries with a large number of protocols already in place is limited. Adequate checklist implementation plays a central role in checklist effectiveness, which in turn is dependent on multiple factors. Conclusion: Although evidence from OECD member countries is non-conclusive, it does suggest that surgical checklists, when effectively implemented, have the potential to be effective at reducing complication and mortality rates following surgery. Within an Australian context, more studies are needed to fully establish the potential effectiveness of surgical checklists and to monitor checklist use compliance in order to ensure greater patient safety. 

    KW - article

    KW - checklist

    KW - health care quality

    KW - health services research

    KW - human

    KW - patient safety

    KW - practice guideline

    KW - quality assurance health care

    KW - standard

    KW - surgery

    KW - treatment outcome

    KW - guideline adherence

    KW - quality of health care

    KW - Checklist

    KW - Humans

    KW - Patient Safety

    KW - Surgical Procedures, Operative

    KW - Treatment Outcome

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897614552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/ans.12168

    DO - 10.1111/ans.12168

    M3 - Article

    VL - 84

    SP - 148

    EP - 154

    JO - ANZ Journal of Surgery

    JF - ANZ Journal of Surgery

    SN - 1445-1433

    IS - 3

    ER -