Sustainable innovation adoption barriers

water sustainability, food production and drip irrigation in Australia

Steven Greenland, Elizabeth Levin, John F. Dalrymple, Barry O’Mahony

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to examine impediments to the adoption of sustainable water-efficient technological innovation in agriculture. Farming is the largest water consumer and food production expansion in response to global population growth, combined with increasing droughts from climate change, threatens water and food insecurity for many countries. Yet, climate smart agriculture (CSA) innovation adoption has been slow, and in this regard, governments and the agricultural sector are not fulfilling their social responsibility and sustainability obligations.

Design/methodology/approach: Barriers to water-efficient drip irrigation (DI) adoption in Australia were investigated via 46 depth interviews with agricultural stakeholders and a survey of 148 farmers.

Findings: While DI water efficiency is recognised, this is not the key determinant of farmers’ irrigation method selection. Complex interrelationships between internal and external barriers impede DI adoption are identified. These include costs, satisfaction with alternative irrigation methods, farmer characteristics that determine the suitability of the innovation and the extent it is incremental or radical, plus various multidimensional risks. Government support of alternative, less water-efficient irrigation methods is also a critical barrier.

Originality/value: A conceptual framework for understanding barriers to sustainability oriented innovation adoption is presented. Its insights should be applicable to researchers and practitioners concerned with understanding and improving the adoption of socially responsible and sustainable innovation in a wide range of contexts. Recommendations for overcoming such adoption barriers are discussed in relation to the research focus of water-efficient agriculture and encouraging uptake of DI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalSocial Responsibility Journal
Early online date29 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 29 Aug 2018

Fingerprint

irrigation
sustainability
food
innovation
water
farmer
agriculture
nutrition situation
agricultural sector
social responsibility
technical innovation
research focus
Sustainability
Innovation adoption
Irrigation
Food production
Water
drought
population growth
obligation

Cite this

@article{144e4d16483d411f9497b5ee1acd8d12,
title = "Sustainable innovation adoption barriers: water sustainability, food production and drip irrigation in Australia",
abstract = "Purpose: This paper aims to examine impediments to the adoption of sustainable water-efficient technological innovation in agriculture. Farming is the largest water consumer and food production expansion in response to global population growth, combined with increasing droughts from climate change, threatens water and food insecurity for many countries. Yet, climate smart agriculture (CSA) innovation adoption has been slow, and in this regard, governments and the agricultural sector are not fulfilling their social responsibility and sustainability obligations. Design/methodology/approach: Barriers to water-efficient drip irrigation (DI) adoption in Australia were investigated via 46 depth interviews with agricultural stakeholders and a survey of 148 farmers. Findings: While DI water efficiency is recognised, this is not the key determinant of farmers’ irrigation method selection. Complex interrelationships between internal and external barriers impede DI adoption are identified. These include costs, satisfaction with alternative irrigation methods, farmer characteristics that determine the suitability of the innovation and the extent it is incremental or radical, plus various multidimensional risks. Government support of alternative, less water-efficient irrigation methods is also a critical barrier. Originality/value: A conceptual framework for understanding barriers to sustainability oriented innovation adoption is presented. Its insights should be applicable to researchers and practitioners concerned with understanding and improving the adoption of socially responsible and sustainable innovation in a wide range of contexts. Recommendations for overcoming such adoption barriers are discussed in relation to the research focus of water-efficient agriculture and encouraging uptake of DI.",
keywords = "Climate smart agriculture, Drip irrigation, Food production, Innovation adoption barriers, Water sustainability",
author = "Steven Greenland and Elizabeth Levin and Dalrymple, {John F.} and Barry O’Mahony",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1108/SRJ-07-2018-0181",
language = "English",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "Social Responsibility Journal",
issn = "1747-1117",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Limited",

}

Sustainable innovation adoption barriers : water sustainability, food production and drip irrigation in Australia. / Greenland, Steven; Levin, Elizabeth; Dalrymple, John F.; O’Mahony, Barry.

In: Social Responsibility Journal, 29.08.2018, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sustainable innovation adoption barriers

T2 - water sustainability, food production and drip irrigation in Australia

AU - Greenland, Steven

AU - Levin, Elizabeth

AU - Dalrymple, John F.

AU - O’Mahony, Barry

PY - 2018/8/29

Y1 - 2018/8/29

N2 - Purpose: This paper aims to examine impediments to the adoption of sustainable water-efficient technological innovation in agriculture. Farming is the largest water consumer and food production expansion in response to global population growth, combined with increasing droughts from climate change, threatens water and food insecurity for many countries. Yet, climate smart agriculture (CSA) innovation adoption has been slow, and in this regard, governments and the agricultural sector are not fulfilling their social responsibility and sustainability obligations. Design/methodology/approach: Barriers to water-efficient drip irrigation (DI) adoption in Australia were investigated via 46 depth interviews with agricultural stakeholders and a survey of 148 farmers. Findings: While DI water efficiency is recognised, this is not the key determinant of farmers’ irrigation method selection. Complex interrelationships between internal and external barriers impede DI adoption are identified. These include costs, satisfaction with alternative irrigation methods, farmer characteristics that determine the suitability of the innovation and the extent it is incremental or radical, plus various multidimensional risks. Government support of alternative, less water-efficient irrigation methods is also a critical barrier. Originality/value: A conceptual framework for understanding barriers to sustainability oriented innovation adoption is presented. Its insights should be applicable to researchers and practitioners concerned with understanding and improving the adoption of socially responsible and sustainable innovation in a wide range of contexts. Recommendations for overcoming such adoption barriers are discussed in relation to the research focus of water-efficient agriculture and encouraging uptake of DI.

AB - Purpose: This paper aims to examine impediments to the adoption of sustainable water-efficient technological innovation in agriculture. Farming is the largest water consumer and food production expansion in response to global population growth, combined with increasing droughts from climate change, threatens water and food insecurity for many countries. Yet, climate smart agriculture (CSA) innovation adoption has been slow, and in this regard, governments and the agricultural sector are not fulfilling their social responsibility and sustainability obligations. Design/methodology/approach: Barriers to water-efficient drip irrigation (DI) adoption in Australia were investigated via 46 depth interviews with agricultural stakeholders and a survey of 148 farmers. Findings: While DI water efficiency is recognised, this is not the key determinant of farmers’ irrigation method selection. Complex interrelationships between internal and external barriers impede DI adoption are identified. These include costs, satisfaction with alternative irrigation methods, farmer characteristics that determine the suitability of the innovation and the extent it is incremental or radical, plus various multidimensional risks. Government support of alternative, less water-efficient irrigation methods is also a critical barrier. Originality/value: A conceptual framework for understanding barriers to sustainability oriented innovation adoption is presented. Its insights should be applicable to researchers and practitioners concerned with understanding and improving the adoption of socially responsible and sustainable innovation in a wide range of contexts. Recommendations for overcoming such adoption barriers are discussed in relation to the research focus of water-efficient agriculture and encouraging uptake of DI.

KW - Climate smart agriculture

KW - Drip irrigation

KW - Food production

KW - Innovation adoption barriers

KW - Water sustainability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057579451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/SRJ-07-2018-0181

DO - 10.1108/SRJ-07-2018-0181

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - Social Responsibility Journal

JF - Social Responsibility Journal

SN - 1747-1117

ER -