Systematic planning can rapidly close the protection gap in Australian mammal havens

Jeremy Ringma; Sarah Legge; John C.Z. Woinarski; James Q. Radford; Brendan Wintle; Joss Bentley; Andrew A. Burbidge; Peter Copley; Nicholas Dexter; Chris R. Dickman; Graeme R. Gillespie; Brydie Hill; Chris N. Johnson; John Kanowski; Mike Letnic; Adrian Manning; Peter Menkhorst; Nicola Mitchell; Keith Morris; Katherine Moseby; Manda Page; Russell Palmer; Michael Bode

doi:10.1111/conl.12611

Systematic planning can rapidly close the protection gap in Australian mammal havens

Jeremy Ringma, Sarah Legge, John C.Z. Woinarski, James Q. Radford, Brendan Wintle, Joss Bentley, Andrew A. Burbidge, Peter Copley, Nicholas Dexter, Chris R. Dickman, Graeme R. Gillespie, Brydie Hill, Chris N. Johnson, John Kanowski, Mike Letnic, Adrian Manning, Peter Menkhorst, Nicola Mitchell, Keith Morris, Katherine MosebyManda Page, Russell Palmer, Michael Bode

Research Institute for Environment and Livelihoods

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

347 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In the last 30 years, islands and fenced exclosures free of introduced predators (collectively, havens) have become an increasingly used option for protecting Australian mammals imperiled by predation by introduced cats (Felis catus) and foxes (Vulpes vulpes). However, Australia's network of havens is not expanding in a manner that maximizes representation of all predator-susceptible taxa, because of continued emphasis on already-represented taxa. Future additions to the haven network will improve representation of mammals most efficiently if they fill gaps in under-represented predator-susceptible taxa, particularly rodents. A systematic approach to expansion could protect at least one population of every Australian predator-susceptible threatened mammal taxon by the addition of 12 new havens to the current network. Were the current haven network to be doubled in number in a systematic manner, it could protect three populations of every Australian predator-susceptible threatened mammal taxon.

Original language	English
Article number	e12611
Pages (from-to)	1-8
Number of pages	8
Journal	Conservation Letters
Volume	12
Issue number	1
Early online date	3 Jan 2019
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12611
Publication status	Published - Feb 2019

Access to Document

10.1111/conl.12611Licence: CC BY

23245348-oaFinal published version, 756 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

Ringma, J., Legge, S., Woinarski, J. C. Z., Radford, J. Q., Wintle, B., Bentley, J., Burbidge, A. A., Copley, P., Dexter, N., Dickman, C. R., Gillespie, G. R., Hill, B., Johnson, C. N., Kanowski, J., Letnic, M., Manning, A., Menkhorst, P., Mitchell, N., Morris, K., ... Bode, M. (2019). Systematic planning can rapidly close the protection gap in Australian mammal havens. Conservation Letters, 12(1), 1-8. Article e12611. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12611

@article{4868f95251b04356b67e8d202fbbd1a0,

title = "Systematic planning can rapidly close the protection gap in Australian mammal havens",

abstract = "In the last 30 years, islands and fenced exclosures free of introduced predators (collectively, havens) have become an increasingly used option for protecting Australian mammals imperiled by predation by introduced cats (Felis catus) and foxes (Vulpes vulpes). However, Australia's network of havens is not expanding in a manner that maximizes representation of all predator-susceptible taxa, because of continued emphasis on already-represented taxa. Future additions to the haven network will improve representation of mammals most efficiently if they fill gaps in under-represented predator-susceptible taxa, particularly rodents. A systematic approach to expansion could protect at least one population of every Australian predator-susceptible threatened mammal taxon by the addition of 12 new havens to the current network. Were the current haven network to be doubled in number in a systematic manner, it could protect three populations of every Australian predator-susceptible threatened mammal taxon.",

keywords = "conservation fencing, introduced species, islands, pest control, predation, systematic conservation planning, threatened species, translocation, wildlife management",

author = "Jeremy Ringma and Sarah Legge and Woinarski, {John C.Z.} and Radford, {James Q.} and Brendan Wintle and Joss Bentley and Burbidge, {Andrew A.} and Peter Copley and Nicholas Dexter and Dickman, {Chris R.} and Gillespie, {Graeme R.} and Brydie Hill and Johnson, {Chris N.} and John Kanowski and Mike Letnic and Adrian Manning and Peter Menkhorst and Nicola Mitchell and Keith Morris and Katherine Moseby and Manda Page and Russell Palmer and Michael Bode",

year = "2019",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1111/conl.12611",

language = "English",

volume = "12",

pages = "1--8",

journal = "Conservation Letters",

issn = "1755-263X",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "1",

}

Ringma, J, Legge, S , Woinarski, JCZ, Radford, JQ, Wintle, B, Bentley, J, Burbidge, AA, Copley, P, Dexter, N, Dickman, CR, Gillespie, GR, Hill, B, Johnson, CN, Kanowski, J, Letnic, M, Manning, A, Menkhorst, P, Mitchell, N, Morris, K, Moseby, K, Page, M, Palmer, R & Bode, M 2019, 'Systematic planning can rapidly close the protection gap in Australian mammal havens', Conservation Letters, vol. 12, no. 1, e12611, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12611

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic planning can rapidly close the protection gap in Australian mammal havens

AU - Ringma, Jeremy

AU - Legge, Sarah

AU - Woinarski, John C.Z.

AU - Radford, James Q.

AU - Wintle, Brendan

AU - Bentley, Joss

AU - Burbidge, Andrew A.

AU - Copley, Peter

AU - Dexter, Nicholas

AU - Dickman, Chris R.

AU - Gillespie, Graeme R.

AU - Hill, Brydie

AU - Johnson, Chris N.

AU - Kanowski, John

AU - Letnic, Mike

AU - Manning, Adrian

AU - Menkhorst, Peter

AU - Mitchell, Nicola

AU - Morris, Keith

AU - Moseby, Katherine

AU - Page, Manda

AU - Palmer, Russell

AU - Bode, Michael

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - In the last 30 years, islands and fenced exclosures free of introduced predators (collectively, havens) have become an increasingly used option for protecting Australian mammals imperiled by predation by introduced cats (Felis catus) and foxes (Vulpes vulpes). However, Australia's network of havens is not expanding in a manner that maximizes representation of all predator-susceptible taxa, because of continued emphasis on already-represented taxa. Future additions to the haven network will improve representation of mammals most efficiently if they fill gaps in under-represented predator-susceptible taxa, particularly rodents. A systematic approach to expansion could protect at least one population of every Australian predator-susceptible threatened mammal taxon by the addition of 12 new havens to the current network. Were the current haven network to be doubled in number in a systematic manner, it could protect three populations of every Australian predator-susceptible threatened mammal taxon.

AB - In the last 30 years, islands and fenced exclosures free of introduced predators (collectively, havens) have become an increasingly used option for protecting Australian mammals imperiled by predation by introduced cats (Felis catus) and foxes (Vulpes vulpes). However, Australia's network of havens is not expanding in a manner that maximizes representation of all predator-susceptible taxa, because of continued emphasis on already-represented taxa. Future additions to the haven network will improve representation of mammals most efficiently if they fill gaps in under-represented predator-susceptible taxa, particularly rodents. A systematic approach to expansion could protect at least one population of every Australian predator-susceptible threatened mammal taxon by the addition of 12 new havens to the current network. Were the current haven network to be doubled in number in a systematic manner, it could protect three populations of every Australian predator-susceptible threatened mammal taxon.

KW - conservation fencing

KW - introduced species

KW - islands

KW - pest control

KW - predation

KW - systematic conservation planning

KW - threatened species

KW - translocation

KW - wildlife management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059569946&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/conl.12611

DO - 10.1111/conl.12611

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85059569946

SN - 1755-263X

VL - 12

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Conservation Letters

JF - Conservation Letters

IS - 1

M1 - e12611

ER -

Systematic planning can rapidly close the protection gap in Australian mammal havens

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this