Systematic planning can rapidly close the protection gap in Australian mammal havens

Jeremy Ringma, Sarah Legge, John C.Z. Woinarski, James Q. Radford, Brendan Wintle, Joss Bentley, Andrew A. Burbidge, Peter Copley, Nicholas Dexter, Chris R. Dickman, Graeme R. Gillespie, Brydie Hill, Chris N. Johnson, John Kanowski, Mike Letnic, Adrian Manning, Peter Menkhorst, Nicola Mitchell, Keith Morris, Katherine MosebyManda Page, Russell Palmer, Michael Bode

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

310 Downloads (Pure)


In the last 30 years, islands and fenced exclosures free of introduced predators (collectively, havens) have become an increasingly used option for protecting Australian mammals imperiled by predation by introduced cats (Felis catus) and foxes (Vulpes vulpes). However, Australia's network of havens is not expanding in a manner that maximizes representation of all predator-susceptible taxa, because of continued emphasis on already-represented taxa. Future additions to the haven network will improve representation of mammals most efficiently if they fill gaps in under-represented predator-susceptible taxa, particularly rodents. A systematic approach to expansion could protect at least one population of every Australian predator-susceptible threatened mammal taxon by the addition of 12 new havens to the current network. Were the current haven network to be doubled in number in a systematic manner, it could protect three populations of every Australian predator-susceptible threatened mammal taxon.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere12611
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalConservation Letters
Issue number1
Early online date3 Jan 2019
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019


Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic planning can rapidly close the protection gap in Australian mammal havens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this