Telling stories in, through and with Country

Engaging with Indigenous and more-than-human methodologies at Bawaka, NE Australia

Sarah Wright, Kate Lloyd, Sandie Suchet-Pearson, Laklak Lak Burarrwanga, Matalena Tofa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Recent work in ethnographic and qualitative methods highlights the limitations of academic accounts of research interactions that aim for total objectivity and authority. Efforts to move beyond totalizing accounts of both the research experience and the investigator raise questions of how to engage with, make sense of, and (re)present embodied, sensual, visceral, and the ultimately placed qualities of collaborative research interactions. Our response to this set of questions entailed recognizing and respecting the knowledge and agency of the human and nonhuman actors involved in co-producing the research. In this paper, we analyze transcripts, research notes and conversations between non-Indigenous academics, Indigenous researchers, and Bawaka, northern Australia itself to explore storytelling as a collaborative, more-than-human methodology. We argue that in research, storytelling consists of verbal, visual, physical, and sensual elements that inform dynamic and ongoing dialogues between humans (academics/co-researchers/family members), and between humans and nonhumans (animals, water, wind). To move beyond the human/nonhuman binary in our storytelling, we look to Aboriginal Australian concepts of Country in which place is relationally defined and continually co-created by both human and nonhuman agents. Acknowledging and engaging with the embodied, more-than-human nature of research contributes to an enlarged understanding of how knowledge is co-produced, experienced, and storied.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-60
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Cultural Geography
Volume29
Issue number1
Early online date29 Feb 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

methodology
interaction research
objectivity
qualitative method
family member
conversation
animal
dialogue
water
experience

Cite this

Wright, Sarah ; Lloyd, Kate ; Suchet-Pearson, Sandie ; Burarrwanga, Laklak Lak ; Tofa, Matalena. / Telling stories in, through and with Country : Engaging with Indigenous and more-than-human methodologies at Bawaka, NE Australia. In: Journal of Cultural Geography. 2012 ; Vol. 29, No. 1. pp. 39-60.
@article{f4990dd6fc104bbda7288e7a104ff085,
title = "Telling stories in, through and with Country: Engaging with Indigenous and more-than-human methodologies at Bawaka, NE Australia",
abstract = "Recent work in ethnographic and qualitative methods highlights the limitations of academic accounts of research interactions that aim for total objectivity and authority. Efforts to move beyond totalizing accounts of both the research experience and the investigator raise questions of how to engage with, make sense of, and (re)present embodied, sensual, visceral, and the ultimately placed qualities of collaborative research interactions. Our response to this set of questions entailed recognizing and respecting the knowledge and agency of the human and nonhuman actors involved in co-producing the research. In this paper, we analyze transcripts, research notes and conversations between non-Indigenous academics, Indigenous researchers, and Bawaka, northern Australia itself to explore storytelling as a collaborative, more-than-human methodology. We argue that in research, storytelling consists of verbal, visual, physical, and sensual elements that inform dynamic and ongoing dialogues between humans (academics/co-researchers/family members), and between humans and nonhumans (animals, water, wind). To move beyond the human/nonhuman binary in our storytelling, we look to Aboriginal Australian concepts of Country in which place is relationally defined and continually co-created by both human and nonhuman agents. Acknowledging and engaging with the embodied, more-than-human nature of research contributes to an enlarged understanding of how knowledge is co-produced, experienced, and storied.",
author = "Sarah Wright and Kate Lloyd and Sandie Suchet-Pearson and Burarrwanga, {Laklak Lak} and Matalena Tofa",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1080/08873631.2012.646890",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "39--60",
journal = "Journal of Cultural Geography",
issn = "0887-3631",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Telling stories in, through and with Country : Engaging with Indigenous and more-than-human methodologies at Bawaka, NE Australia. / Wright, Sarah; Lloyd, Kate; Suchet-Pearson, Sandie; Burarrwanga, Laklak Lak; Tofa, Matalena.

In: Journal of Cultural Geography, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2012, p. 39-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Telling stories in, through and with Country

T2 - Engaging with Indigenous and more-than-human methodologies at Bawaka, NE Australia

AU - Wright, Sarah

AU - Lloyd, Kate

AU - Suchet-Pearson, Sandie

AU - Burarrwanga, Laklak Lak

AU - Tofa, Matalena

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Recent work in ethnographic and qualitative methods highlights the limitations of academic accounts of research interactions that aim for total objectivity and authority. Efforts to move beyond totalizing accounts of both the research experience and the investigator raise questions of how to engage with, make sense of, and (re)present embodied, sensual, visceral, and the ultimately placed qualities of collaborative research interactions. Our response to this set of questions entailed recognizing and respecting the knowledge and agency of the human and nonhuman actors involved in co-producing the research. In this paper, we analyze transcripts, research notes and conversations between non-Indigenous academics, Indigenous researchers, and Bawaka, northern Australia itself to explore storytelling as a collaborative, more-than-human methodology. We argue that in research, storytelling consists of verbal, visual, physical, and sensual elements that inform dynamic and ongoing dialogues between humans (academics/co-researchers/family members), and between humans and nonhumans (animals, water, wind). To move beyond the human/nonhuman binary in our storytelling, we look to Aboriginal Australian concepts of Country in which place is relationally defined and continually co-created by both human and nonhuman agents. Acknowledging and engaging with the embodied, more-than-human nature of research contributes to an enlarged understanding of how knowledge is co-produced, experienced, and storied.

AB - Recent work in ethnographic and qualitative methods highlights the limitations of academic accounts of research interactions that aim for total objectivity and authority. Efforts to move beyond totalizing accounts of both the research experience and the investigator raise questions of how to engage with, make sense of, and (re)present embodied, sensual, visceral, and the ultimately placed qualities of collaborative research interactions. Our response to this set of questions entailed recognizing and respecting the knowledge and agency of the human and nonhuman actors involved in co-producing the research. In this paper, we analyze transcripts, research notes and conversations between non-Indigenous academics, Indigenous researchers, and Bawaka, northern Australia itself to explore storytelling as a collaborative, more-than-human methodology. We argue that in research, storytelling consists of verbal, visual, physical, and sensual elements that inform dynamic and ongoing dialogues between humans (academics/co-researchers/family members), and between humans and nonhumans (animals, water, wind). To move beyond the human/nonhuman binary in our storytelling, we look to Aboriginal Australian concepts of Country in which place is relationally defined and continually co-created by both human and nonhuman agents. Acknowledging and engaging with the embodied, more-than-human nature of research contributes to an enlarged understanding of how knowledge is co-produced, experienced, and storied.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858181925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08873631.2012.646890

DO - 10.1080/08873631.2012.646890

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 39

EP - 60

JO - Journal of Cultural Geography

JF - Journal of Cultural Geography

SN - 0887-3631

IS - 1

ER -