The adoption and implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) among allied health professions

Penney Upton, Laura Scurlock-Evans, Danielle Stephens, Dominic Upton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background and aims: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is widely accepted within patient care as it ensures health care professionals remain informed of recent evidence and research relating to their clinical practice. However, the particular characteristics detrimental to the successful implementation of EBP within Allied Health Professionals' (AHP) clinical practice are unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess and characterise adoption of EBP within AHP's clinical practice.

Methods: Questionnaires comprising the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ; Upton and Upton, 2006a) were administered to 154 (response rate=27.3%) newly qualified practitioners (NQPs) from NHSScotland. Data were analysed to determine attitudes, knowledge and skill of EBP; K-means cluster and chi-square analyses were conducted in order to differentiate profiles of NPQs within high-, medium- and low- categories on the EBPQ practice and knowledge/skills sub-sections.

Findings: Moderate scores were recorded for NQP's implementation, knowledge, and attitudes toward EBP. Chi-square analysis performed on the high-, moderate- and low- practice and skills' profiles revealed no significant results for NQP's year qualified, age, or year of clinical practice.

Conclusions: The findings illustrate that the majority of NQPs have a good understanding of the application and importance of EPB, and suggests the improvement in NQPs training with regards to EBP enables them to successfully transfer acquired knowledge within their clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)497-503
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation
Volume19
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health Occupations
Evidence-Based Practice
Allied Health Personnel
Professional Practice
Patient Care
Delivery of Health Care
Research

Cite this

@article{97e572be356b4165ab10dbc30a0fae64,
title = "The adoption and implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) among allied health professions",
abstract = "Background and aims: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is widely accepted within patient care as it ensures health care professionals remain informed of recent evidence and research relating to their clinical practice. However, the particular characteristics detrimental to the successful implementation of EBP within Allied Health Professionals' (AHP) clinical practice are unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess and characterise adoption of EBP within AHP's clinical practice. Methods: Questionnaires comprising the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ; Upton and Upton, 2006a) were administered to 154 (response rate=27.3{\%}) newly qualified practitioners (NQPs) from NHSScotland. Data were analysed to determine attitudes, knowledge and skill of EBP; K-means cluster and chi-square analyses were conducted in order to differentiate profiles of NPQs within high-, medium- and low- categories on the EBPQ practice and knowledge/skills sub-sections. Findings: Moderate scores were recorded for NQP's implementation, knowledge, and attitudes toward EBP. Chi-square analysis performed on the high-, moderate- and low- practice and skills' profiles revealed no significant results for NQP's year qualified, age, or year of clinical practice. Conclusions: The findings illustrate that the majority of NQPs have a good understanding of the application and importance of EPB, and suggests the improvement in NQPs training with regards to EBP enables them to successfully transfer acquired knowledge within their clinical practice.",
keywords = "Allied health professions, Cluster analysis, EBP, EBPQ, Newly qualified practitioner",
author = "Penney Upton and Laura Scurlock-Evans and Danielle Stephens and Dominic Upton",
note = "Published Online: September 29, 2013",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.12968/ijtr.2012.19.9.497",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "497--503",
journal = "International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation",
issn = "1354-8581",
publisher = "Mark Allen Publishing Ltd.",
number = "9",

}

The adoption and implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) among allied health professions. / Upton, Penney; Scurlock-Evans, Laura; Stephens, Danielle; Upton, Dominic.

In: International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, Vol. 19, No. 9, 01.01.2012, p. 497-503.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The adoption and implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) among allied health professions

AU - Upton, Penney

AU - Scurlock-Evans, Laura

AU - Stephens, Danielle

AU - Upton, Dominic

N1 - Published Online: September 29, 2013

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Background and aims: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is widely accepted within patient care as it ensures health care professionals remain informed of recent evidence and research relating to their clinical practice. However, the particular characteristics detrimental to the successful implementation of EBP within Allied Health Professionals' (AHP) clinical practice are unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess and characterise adoption of EBP within AHP's clinical practice. Methods: Questionnaires comprising the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ; Upton and Upton, 2006a) were administered to 154 (response rate=27.3%) newly qualified practitioners (NQPs) from NHSScotland. Data were analysed to determine attitudes, knowledge and skill of EBP; K-means cluster and chi-square analyses were conducted in order to differentiate profiles of NPQs within high-, medium- and low- categories on the EBPQ practice and knowledge/skills sub-sections. Findings: Moderate scores were recorded for NQP's implementation, knowledge, and attitudes toward EBP. Chi-square analysis performed on the high-, moderate- and low- practice and skills' profiles revealed no significant results for NQP's year qualified, age, or year of clinical practice. Conclusions: The findings illustrate that the majority of NQPs have a good understanding of the application and importance of EPB, and suggests the improvement in NQPs training with regards to EBP enables them to successfully transfer acquired knowledge within their clinical practice.

AB - Background and aims: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is widely accepted within patient care as it ensures health care professionals remain informed of recent evidence and research relating to their clinical practice. However, the particular characteristics detrimental to the successful implementation of EBP within Allied Health Professionals' (AHP) clinical practice are unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess and characterise adoption of EBP within AHP's clinical practice. Methods: Questionnaires comprising the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ; Upton and Upton, 2006a) were administered to 154 (response rate=27.3%) newly qualified practitioners (NQPs) from NHSScotland. Data were analysed to determine attitudes, knowledge and skill of EBP; K-means cluster and chi-square analyses were conducted in order to differentiate profiles of NPQs within high-, medium- and low- categories on the EBPQ practice and knowledge/skills sub-sections. Findings: Moderate scores were recorded for NQP's implementation, knowledge, and attitudes toward EBP. Chi-square analysis performed on the high-, moderate- and low- practice and skills' profiles revealed no significant results for NQP's year qualified, age, or year of clinical practice. Conclusions: The findings illustrate that the majority of NQPs have a good understanding of the application and importance of EPB, and suggests the improvement in NQPs training with regards to EBP enables them to successfully transfer acquired knowledge within their clinical practice.

KW - Allied health professions

KW - Cluster analysis

KW - EBP

KW - EBPQ

KW - Newly qualified practitioner

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868630945&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.12968/ijtr.2012.19.9.497

DO - 10.12968/ijtr.2012.19.9.497

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 497

EP - 503

JO - International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation

JF - International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation

SN - 1354-8581

IS - 9

ER -