The artful mind meets art history

Toward a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation

Nicolas J. Bullot, Rolf Reber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Research seeking a scientific foundation for the theory of art appreciation has raised controversies at the intersection of the social and cognitive sciences. Though equally relevant to a scientific inquiry into art appreciation, psychological and historical approaches to art developed independently and lack a common core of theoretical principles. Historicists argue that psychological and brain sciences ignore the fact that artworks are artifacts produced and appreciated in the context of unique historical situations and artistic intentions. After revealing flaws in the psychological approach, we introduce a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation. This framework demonstrates that a science of art appreciation must investigate how appreciators process causal and historical information to classify and explain their psychological responses to art. Expanding on research about the cognition of artifacts, we identify three modes of appreciation: basic exposure to an artwork, the artistic design stance, and artistic understanding. The artistic design stance, a requisite for artistic understanding, is an attitude whereby appreciators develop their sensitivity to art-historical contexts by means of inquiries into the making, authorship, and functions of artworks. We defend and illustrate the psycho-historical framework with an analysis of existing studies on art appreciation in empirical aesthetics. Finally, we argue that the fluency theory of aesthetic pleasure can be amended to meet the requirements of the framework. We conclude that scientists can tackle fundamental questions about the nature and appreciation of art within the psycho-historical framework.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)123-137
Number of pages15
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

art history
Art
History
art
science
Psychology
Esthetics
Artifacts
artifact
aesthetics
Cognitive Science
Authorship
Art History
Pleasure
Social Sciences
Research
Cognition
cognition
brain
Psychological

Cite this

@article{3cbfd26b96674009ab02fea3600e484a,
title = "The artful mind meets art history: Toward a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation",
abstract = "Research seeking a scientific foundation for the theory of art appreciation has raised controversies at the intersection of the social and cognitive sciences. Though equally relevant to a scientific inquiry into art appreciation, psychological and historical approaches to art developed independently and lack a common core of theoretical principles. Historicists argue that psychological and brain sciences ignore the fact that artworks are artifacts produced and appreciated in the context of unique historical situations and artistic intentions. After revealing flaws in the psychological approach, we introduce a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation. This framework demonstrates that a science of art appreciation must investigate how appreciators process causal and historical information to classify and explain their psychological responses to art. Expanding on research about the cognition of artifacts, we identify three modes of appreciation: basic exposure to an artwork, the artistic design stance, and artistic understanding. The artistic design stance, a requisite for artistic understanding, is an attitude whereby appreciators develop their sensitivity to art-historical contexts by means of inquiries into the making, authorship, and functions of artworks. We defend and illustrate the psycho-historical framework with an analysis of existing studies on art appreciation in empirical aesthetics. Finally, we argue that the fluency theory of aesthetic pleasure can be amended to meet the requirements of the framework. We conclude that scientists can tackle fundamental questions about the nature and appreciation of art within the psycho-historical framework.",
keywords = "art appreciation, causal reasoning, cognition of artifacts, cognitive tracking, design stance, essentialism, function, history of art, mindreading, processing fluency, psycho-historical framework",
author = "Bullot, {Nicolas J.} and Rolf Reber",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1017/S0140525X12000489",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "123--137",
journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",
issn = "0140-525X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

The artful mind meets art history : Toward a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation. / Bullot, Nicolas J.; Reber, Rolf.

In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 36, No. 2, 04.2013, p. 123-137.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The artful mind meets art history

T2 - Toward a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation

AU - Bullot, Nicolas J.

AU - Reber, Rolf

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Research seeking a scientific foundation for the theory of art appreciation has raised controversies at the intersection of the social and cognitive sciences. Though equally relevant to a scientific inquiry into art appreciation, psychological and historical approaches to art developed independently and lack a common core of theoretical principles. Historicists argue that psychological and brain sciences ignore the fact that artworks are artifacts produced and appreciated in the context of unique historical situations and artistic intentions. After revealing flaws in the psychological approach, we introduce a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation. This framework demonstrates that a science of art appreciation must investigate how appreciators process causal and historical information to classify and explain their psychological responses to art. Expanding on research about the cognition of artifacts, we identify three modes of appreciation: basic exposure to an artwork, the artistic design stance, and artistic understanding. The artistic design stance, a requisite for artistic understanding, is an attitude whereby appreciators develop their sensitivity to art-historical contexts by means of inquiries into the making, authorship, and functions of artworks. We defend and illustrate the psycho-historical framework with an analysis of existing studies on art appreciation in empirical aesthetics. Finally, we argue that the fluency theory of aesthetic pleasure can be amended to meet the requirements of the framework. We conclude that scientists can tackle fundamental questions about the nature and appreciation of art within the psycho-historical framework.

AB - Research seeking a scientific foundation for the theory of art appreciation has raised controversies at the intersection of the social and cognitive sciences. Though equally relevant to a scientific inquiry into art appreciation, psychological and historical approaches to art developed independently and lack a common core of theoretical principles. Historicists argue that psychological and brain sciences ignore the fact that artworks are artifacts produced and appreciated in the context of unique historical situations and artistic intentions. After revealing flaws in the psychological approach, we introduce a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation. This framework demonstrates that a science of art appreciation must investigate how appreciators process causal and historical information to classify and explain their psychological responses to art. Expanding on research about the cognition of artifacts, we identify three modes of appreciation: basic exposure to an artwork, the artistic design stance, and artistic understanding. The artistic design stance, a requisite for artistic understanding, is an attitude whereby appreciators develop their sensitivity to art-historical contexts by means of inquiries into the making, authorship, and functions of artworks. We defend and illustrate the psycho-historical framework with an analysis of existing studies on art appreciation in empirical aesthetics. Finally, we argue that the fluency theory of aesthetic pleasure can be amended to meet the requirements of the framework. We conclude that scientists can tackle fundamental questions about the nature and appreciation of art within the psycho-historical framework.

KW - art appreciation

KW - causal reasoning

KW - cognition of artifacts

KW - cognitive tracking

KW - design stance

KW - essentialism

KW - function

KW - history of art

KW - mindreading

KW - processing fluency

KW - psycho-historical framework

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875176324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X12000489

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X12000489

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 123

EP - 137

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

IS - 2

ER -