@article{5aa1792b1a044ec78914fcefdb679791,
title = "The case for fencing remains intact",
abstract = "Creel et al. argue against the conservation effectiveness of fencing based on a population measure that ignores the importance of top predators to ecosystem processes. Their statistical analyses consider, first, only a subset of fenced reserves and, second, an incomplete examination of 'costs per lion.' Our original conclusions remain unaltered. ",
keywords = "carrying capacity, edge effect, felid, population density, population size, predator, species conservation, animal, article, Carnivora, Carrying capacity, edge effects, environmental protection, fences, human, lion, methodology, lions, Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Humans, Lions, Population Density",
author = "C Packer and A Swanson and S Canney and A Loveridge and Stephen Garnett and M Pfeifer and A Burton and H Bauer and D MacNulty",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1111/ele.12171",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "1414--e4",
journal = "Ecology Letters",
issn = "1461-023X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",
}