The case for fencing remains intact

C Packer, A Swanson, S Canney, A Loveridge, Stephen Garnett, M Pfeifer, A Burton, H Bauer, D MacNulty

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review


    Creel et al. argue against the conservation effectiveness of fencing based on a population measure that ignores the importance of top predators to ecosystem processes. Their statistical analyses consider, first, only a subset of fenced reserves and, second, an incomplete examination of 'costs per lion.' Our original conclusions remain unaltered. 
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1414-e4
    Number of pages2
    JournalEcology Letters
    Issue number11
    Publication statusPublished - 2013


    Dive into the research topics of 'The case for fencing remains intact'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this