The cost of collaboration

How Caring for Our Country has shaped regional Natural Resource Management in an Australian river catchment

C.F. Benham, Sara Beavis, Karen Hussey

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    11 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Funding arrangements for Natural Resource Management (NRM) in Australia have undergone a number of changes in the last decade, including the transition from the Natural Heritage Trust (NHT) to the Caring for Our Country (CfoC) program (recently merged with Landcare to become the National Landcare Programme). It has been suggested that CfoC eroded some of the gains in regional autonomy, community engagement and goodwill made under the NHT. This article presents the results of research conducted with regional NRM bodies and community-based stakeholders in the Upper Murrumbidgee catchment, south-eastern Australia. It explores the impacts of the CfoC grants structure on NRM bodies and communities, and examines the practical responses of resource managers to funding constraints. The research demonstrates that the structure of NRM funding delivery under CfoC played a key role in shaping the strategic and operational activities of regional NRM bodies and community groups. In particular, the short-term, single-issue focus of the program placed pressure on collaborations between regional NRM bodies and other groups, and could inhibit strategic and integrated approaches to NRM. At the same time, however, NRM planners and community stakeholders have actively managed the limitations of the CfoC structure to optimise catchment outcomes for communities and the environment.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)285-297
    Number of pages13
    JournalAustralasian Journal of Environmental Management
    Volume22
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    natural resources
    resource management
    natural resource
    river
    catchment
    costs
    management
    cost
    community
    funding
    stakeholder
    strategic approach
    autonomy
    integrated approach
    grant
    Group
    manager
    resource
    programme
    resources

    Cite this

    @article{2440263400d24fda823f808cc254c625,
    title = "The cost of collaboration: How Caring for Our Country has shaped regional Natural Resource Management in an Australian river catchment",
    abstract = "Funding arrangements for Natural Resource Management (NRM) in Australia have undergone a number of changes in the last decade, including the transition from the Natural Heritage Trust (NHT) to the Caring for Our Country (CfoC) program (recently merged with Landcare to become the National Landcare Programme). It has been suggested that CfoC eroded some of the gains in regional autonomy, community engagement and goodwill made under the NHT. This article presents the results of research conducted with regional NRM bodies and community-based stakeholders in the Upper Murrumbidgee catchment, south-eastern Australia. It explores the impacts of the CfoC grants structure on NRM bodies and communities, and examines the practical responses of resource managers to funding constraints. The research demonstrates that the structure of NRM funding delivery under CfoC played a key role in shaping the strategic and operational activities of regional NRM bodies and community groups. In particular, the short-term, single-issue focus of the program placed pressure on collaborations between regional NRM bodies and other groups, and could inhibit strategic and integrated approaches to NRM. At the same time, however, NRM planners and community stakeholders have actively managed the limitations of the CfoC structure to optimise catchment outcomes for communities and the environment.",
    author = "C.F. Benham and Sara Beavis and Karen Hussey",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1080/14486563.2014.976847",
    language = "English",
    volume = "22",
    pages = "285--297",
    journal = "Australasian Journal of Environmental Management",
    issn = "2159-5356",
    publisher = "Hallmark Editions",
    number = "3",

    }

    The cost of collaboration : How Caring for Our Country has shaped regional Natural Resource Management in an Australian river catchment. / Benham, C.F.; Beavis, Sara; Hussey, Karen.

    In: Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2015, p. 285-297.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The cost of collaboration

    T2 - How Caring for Our Country has shaped regional Natural Resource Management in an Australian river catchment

    AU - Benham, C.F.

    AU - Beavis, Sara

    AU - Hussey, Karen

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Funding arrangements for Natural Resource Management (NRM) in Australia have undergone a number of changes in the last decade, including the transition from the Natural Heritage Trust (NHT) to the Caring for Our Country (CfoC) program (recently merged with Landcare to become the National Landcare Programme). It has been suggested that CfoC eroded some of the gains in regional autonomy, community engagement and goodwill made under the NHT. This article presents the results of research conducted with regional NRM bodies and community-based stakeholders in the Upper Murrumbidgee catchment, south-eastern Australia. It explores the impacts of the CfoC grants structure on NRM bodies and communities, and examines the practical responses of resource managers to funding constraints. The research demonstrates that the structure of NRM funding delivery under CfoC played a key role in shaping the strategic and operational activities of regional NRM bodies and community groups. In particular, the short-term, single-issue focus of the program placed pressure on collaborations between regional NRM bodies and other groups, and could inhibit strategic and integrated approaches to NRM. At the same time, however, NRM planners and community stakeholders have actively managed the limitations of the CfoC structure to optimise catchment outcomes for communities and the environment.

    AB - Funding arrangements for Natural Resource Management (NRM) in Australia have undergone a number of changes in the last decade, including the transition from the Natural Heritage Trust (NHT) to the Caring for Our Country (CfoC) program (recently merged with Landcare to become the National Landcare Programme). It has been suggested that CfoC eroded some of the gains in regional autonomy, community engagement and goodwill made under the NHT. This article presents the results of research conducted with regional NRM bodies and community-based stakeholders in the Upper Murrumbidgee catchment, south-eastern Australia. It explores the impacts of the CfoC grants structure on NRM bodies and communities, and examines the practical responses of resource managers to funding constraints. The research demonstrates that the structure of NRM funding delivery under CfoC played a key role in shaping the strategic and operational activities of regional NRM bodies and community groups. In particular, the short-term, single-issue focus of the program placed pressure on collaborations between regional NRM bodies and other groups, and could inhibit strategic and integrated approaches to NRM. At the same time, however, NRM planners and community stakeholders have actively managed the limitations of the CfoC structure to optimise catchment outcomes for communities and the environment.

    U2 - 10.1080/14486563.2014.976847

    DO - 10.1080/14486563.2014.976847

    M3 - Article

    VL - 22

    SP - 285

    EP - 297

    JO - Australasian Journal of Environmental Management

    JF - Australasian Journal of Environmental Management

    SN - 2159-5356

    IS - 3

    ER -