The Cultural Validity of Diagnostic Psychiatric Measures for Indigenous Australians

Emma B. Black, Maree R. Toombs, Steve Kisely

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: There is limited research available regarding the prevalence rates of psychiatric illness in Indigenous Australians, and the available literature varies widely in terms of methods and findings. Culturally valid and appropriate tools are needed to ensure accurate outcomes. The purpose of this review is to examine the methods used to diagnose psychiatric disorders in Indigenous Australians and identify whether these are culturally appropriate or valid. Method: A systematic search of available literature was undertaken in electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, PsycArticles, Web of Science, Medline, and Informit Health Indigenous Australians Peoples Collections). Narrative synthesis was used to analyse the data obtained, with a quantitative evaluations of study quality and cultural validity. Results: Twelve articles were included for review. Six studies were of diagnostic tools and none had been validated for use with Indigenous Australians. Another six used practitioner assessment. Some studies indirectly referenced cultural competence on behalf of the practitioner, but again on the whole this was lacking. Conclusions: Further validation of the use of diagnostic instruments in Indigenous Australians is needed so that the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in this population can be accurately determined. In addition, practitioners working with Indigenous Australians should have some training in cultural awareness or competence, and consider the cultural appropriateness of diagnostic tools when applied to this population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)383-393
Number of pages11
JournalAustralian Psychologist
Volume53
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Cultural Validity of Diagnostic Psychiatric Measures for Indigenous Australians'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this