The culture of bird conservation

Australian stakeholder values regarding iconic, flagship and rare birds

Gillian B. Ainsworth, James A. Fitzsimons, Michael A. Weston, Stephen T. Garnett

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Iconic, flagship and rare threatened bird taxa attract disproportionate amounts of public attention, and are often used to enable broader conservation strategies. Yet, little is known about why certain taxa achieve iconic or flagship status. Also unclear is whether the perception of rarity among those acting to conserve threatened birds is sufficient to influence attitudes and behaviour that lead to effective conservation action and, if so, which characteristics of rare birds are important to their conservation. We interviewed 74 threatened bird conservation stakeholders to explore perceptions about iconic, flagship and rare threatened birds and classified their attitudes using a new typology of avifaunal attitudes. There was a relationship between societal interest and conservation effort for threatened species characterised as iconic, flagship and rare. Iconic species tended to arouse interest or emotion in people due to being appealing and readily encountered, thereby attracting conservation interest that can benefit other biodiversity. Flagships tended to have distinguishing physical or cultural characteristics and were used to convey conservation messages about associated biodiversity. Attitudes about rarity mostly related to a taxon’s threatened status and small population size. Rarity was important for threatened bird conservation but not always associated with attitudes and behaviour that lead to effective conservation action. We conclude that conservation action for individual threatened bird taxa is biased and directly influenced by the ways taxa are socially constructed by stakeholders, which is specific to prevailing culture and stakeholder knowledge.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)345-363
    Number of pages19
    JournalBiodiversity and Conservation
    Volume27
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2018

    Fingerprint

    threatened species
    stakeholders
    stakeholder
    bird
    birds
    rarity
    biodiversity
    emotions
    population size
    typology

    Cite this

    Ainsworth, Gillian B. ; Fitzsimons, James A. ; Weston, Michael A. ; Garnett, Stephen T. / The culture of bird conservation : Australian stakeholder values regarding iconic, flagship and rare birds. In: Biodiversity and Conservation. 2018 ; Vol. 27, No. 2. pp. 345-363.
    @article{fd7f9f9379454bc5a57da0c94fdf679d,
    title = "The culture of bird conservation: Australian stakeholder values regarding iconic, flagship and rare birds",
    abstract = "Iconic, flagship and rare threatened bird taxa attract disproportionate amounts of public attention, and are often used to enable broader conservation strategies. Yet, little is known about why certain taxa achieve iconic or flagship status. Also unclear is whether the perception of rarity among those acting to conserve threatened birds is sufficient to influence attitudes and behaviour that lead to effective conservation action and, if so, which characteristics of rare birds are important to their conservation. We interviewed 74 threatened bird conservation stakeholders to explore perceptions about iconic, flagship and rare threatened birds and classified their attitudes using a new typology of avifaunal attitudes. There was a relationship between societal interest and conservation effort for threatened species characterised as iconic, flagship and rare. Iconic species tended to arouse interest or emotion in people due to being appealing and readily encountered, thereby attracting conservation interest that can benefit other biodiversity. Flagships tended to have distinguishing physical or cultural characteristics and were used to convey conservation messages about associated biodiversity. Attitudes about rarity mostly related to a taxon’s threatened status and small population size. Rarity was important for threatened bird conservation but not always associated with attitudes and behaviour that lead to effective conservation action. We conclude that conservation action for individual threatened bird taxa is biased and directly influenced by the ways taxa are socially constructed by stakeholders, which is specific to prevailing culture and stakeholder knowledge.",
    keywords = "Attitude, Knowledge, Preference, Prioritisation, Socio-ecological",
    author = "Ainsworth, {Gillian B.} and Fitzsimons, {James A.} and Weston, {Michael A.} and Garnett, {Stephen T.}",
    year = "2018",
    month = "2",
    doi = "10.1007/s10531-017-1438-1",
    language = "English",
    volume = "27",
    pages = "345--363",
    journal = "Biodiversity and Conservation",
    issn = "0960-3115",
    publisher = "Springer",
    number = "2",

    }

    The culture of bird conservation : Australian stakeholder values regarding iconic, flagship and rare birds. / Ainsworth, Gillian B.; Fitzsimons, James A.; Weston, Michael A.; Garnett, Stephen T.

    In: Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 27, No. 2, 02.2018, p. 345-363.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The culture of bird conservation

    T2 - Australian stakeholder values regarding iconic, flagship and rare birds

    AU - Ainsworth, Gillian B.

    AU - Fitzsimons, James A.

    AU - Weston, Michael A.

    AU - Garnett, Stephen T.

    PY - 2018/2

    Y1 - 2018/2

    N2 - Iconic, flagship and rare threatened bird taxa attract disproportionate amounts of public attention, and are often used to enable broader conservation strategies. Yet, little is known about why certain taxa achieve iconic or flagship status. Also unclear is whether the perception of rarity among those acting to conserve threatened birds is sufficient to influence attitudes and behaviour that lead to effective conservation action and, if so, which characteristics of rare birds are important to their conservation. We interviewed 74 threatened bird conservation stakeholders to explore perceptions about iconic, flagship and rare threatened birds and classified their attitudes using a new typology of avifaunal attitudes. There was a relationship between societal interest and conservation effort for threatened species characterised as iconic, flagship and rare. Iconic species tended to arouse interest or emotion in people due to being appealing and readily encountered, thereby attracting conservation interest that can benefit other biodiversity. Flagships tended to have distinguishing physical or cultural characteristics and were used to convey conservation messages about associated biodiversity. Attitudes about rarity mostly related to a taxon’s threatened status and small population size. Rarity was important for threatened bird conservation but not always associated with attitudes and behaviour that lead to effective conservation action. We conclude that conservation action for individual threatened bird taxa is biased and directly influenced by the ways taxa are socially constructed by stakeholders, which is specific to prevailing culture and stakeholder knowledge.

    AB - Iconic, flagship and rare threatened bird taxa attract disproportionate amounts of public attention, and are often used to enable broader conservation strategies. Yet, little is known about why certain taxa achieve iconic or flagship status. Also unclear is whether the perception of rarity among those acting to conserve threatened birds is sufficient to influence attitudes and behaviour that lead to effective conservation action and, if so, which characteristics of rare birds are important to their conservation. We interviewed 74 threatened bird conservation stakeholders to explore perceptions about iconic, flagship and rare threatened birds and classified their attitudes using a new typology of avifaunal attitudes. There was a relationship between societal interest and conservation effort for threatened species characterised as iconic, flagship and rare. Iconic species tended to arouse interest or emotion in people due to being appealing and readily encountered, thereby attracting conservation interest that can benefit other biodiversity. Flagships tended to have distinguishing physical or cultural characteristics and were used to convey conservation messages about associated biodiversity. Attitudes about rarity mostly related to a taxon’s threatened status and small population size. Rarity was important for threatened bird conservation but not always associated with attitudes and behaviour that lead to effective conservation action. We conclude that conservation action for individual threatened bird taxa is biased and directly influenced by the ways taxa are socially constructed by stakeholders, which is specific to prevailing culture and stakeholder knowledge.

    KW - Attitude

    KW - Knowledge

    KW - Preference

    KW - Prioritisation

    KW - Socio-ecological

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030119570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s10531-017-1438-1

    DO - 10.1007/s10531-017-1438-1

    M3 - Article

    VL - 27

    SP - 345

    EP - 363

    JO - Biodiversity and Conservation

    JF - Biodiversity and Conservation

    SN - 0960-3115

    IS - 2

    ER -