Abstract
The chapter makes an analogy between two quite different metrics that equally ‘have life’ in the organisations and institutions of both Indigenous and mainstream Australian lifeways. I juxtapose Indigenous systems of kin names, with modernity’s numbers. Of course, I recognise that the systems of kinship names that have life in Indigenous Australia are profoundly different than numbers. Yet here is a convincing argument that in several important senses they are alike: different but partially same. The chapter explores the reasons for recognising both the difference and the similarity
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Indigenous Engineering for an Enduring Culture |
| Editors | Cat Kutay, Elyssebeth Leigh, Juliana Kaya Pripic, Lyndon Ormond-Parker |
| Place of Publication | Newcastle upon Tyne |
| Publisher | Cambridge Scholars Publishing |
| Chapter | 20 |
| Pages | 388-403 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781527587601 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781527587595 |
| Publication status | Published - 2022 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Duality of Metric Concepts of Contemporary Indigenous Australian Lifeways: Kinship Categories and Numbers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver