TY - JOUR
T1 - The Echocardiographic Diagnosis of Rheumatic Heart Disease
T2 - A Review of the Performance of the World Heart Federation Criteria 2012-2023
AU - Marangou, James
AU - Rwebembera, Joselyn
AU - Mwita, Julius
AU - Thorup, Lene
AU - Remenyi, Bo
AU - Nascimento, Bruno Ramos
AU - Beaton, Andrea
AU - Kumar, Krishna
AU - Okello, Emmy
AU - Raltson, Kate
AU - Sable, Craig
AU - Wheaton, Gavin
AU - Wilson, Nigel
AU - Zuhlke, Liesl
AU - Mota, Cleonice
AU - Mocumbi, Ana
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s).
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background: The World Heart Federation (WHF) published the first evidence-based guidelines on the echocardiographic diagnosis of rheumatic heart disease (RHD) in 2012. These guidelines have since been applied internationally in research and clinical practice. Substantial research has assessed the utility of the 2012 WHF criteria, including its applicability in low-resource settings. This article summarises the evidence regarding the performance of the guidelines. Methods: A scoping review assessing the performance of the guidelines was performed. Cochrane, Embase, Medline, PubMed Lilacs, Sielo, and Portal BVS databases were searched for studies on the performance of the guidelines between January 2012-March 2023, and 4047 manuscripts met the search criteria, of which 34 were included. This included papers assessing the specificity, inter-rater reliability, application using hand-carried ultrasound, and modification of the criteria for simplicity. The review followed the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guideline. Results: The WHF 2012 criteria were 100% specific for definite RHD when applied in low-prevalence populations. The criteria demonstrated substantial and moderate inter-rater reliability for detecting definite and borderline RHD, respectively. The inter-rater reliability for morphological features was lower than for valvular regurgitation. When applied to hand-carried ultrasound performed by an expert, modified versions of the criteria demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity range of 79-90% and 87-93% respectively for detecting any RHD, performing best for definite RHD. The sensitivity and the specificity were reduced when performed in task-sharing but remains moderately accurate. Conclusion: The WHF 2012 criteria provide clear guidance for the echocardiographic diagnosis of RHD that is reproducible and applicable to a range of echocardiographic technology. Furthermore, the criteria are highly specific and particularly accurate for detecting definite RHD. There are limitations in applying all aspects of the criteria in specific settings, including task-sharing. This summary of evidence can inform the updated version of the WHF guidelines to ensure improved applicability in all RHD endemic regions.
AB - Background: The World Heart Federation (WHF) published the first evidence-based guidelines on the echocardiographic diagnosis of rheumatic heart disease (RHD) in 2012. These guidelines have since been applied internationally in research and clinical practice. Substantial research has assessed the utility of the 2012 WHF criteria, including its applicability in low-resource settings. This article summarises the evidence regarding the performance of the guidelines. Methods: A scoping review assessing the performance of the guidelines was performed. Cochrane, Embase, Medline, PubMed Lilacs, Sielo, and Portal BVS databases were searched for studies on the performance of the guidelines between January 2012-March 2023, and 4047 manuscripts met the search criteria, of which 34 were included. This included papers assessing the specificity, inter-rater reliability, application using hand-carried ultrasound, and modification of the criteria for simplicity. The review followed the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guideline. Results: The WHF 2012 criteria were 100% specific for definite RHD when applied in low-prevalence populations. The criteria demonstrated substantial and moderate inter-rater reliability for detecting definite and borderline RHD, respectively. The inter-rater reliability for morphological features was lower than for valvular regurgitation. When applied to hand-carried ultrasound performed by an expert, modified versions of the criteria demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity range of 79-90% and 87-93% respectively for detecting any RHD, performing best for definite RHD. The sensitivity and the specificity were reduced when performed in task-sharing but remains moderately accurate. Conclusion: The WHF 2012 criteria provide clear guidance for the echocardiographic diagnosis of RHD that is reproducible and applicable to a range of echocardiographic technology. Furthermore, the criteria are highly specific and particularly accurate for detecting definite RHD. There are limitations in applying all aspects of the criteria in specific settings, including task-sharing. This summary of evidence can inform the updated version of the WHF guidelines to ensure improved applicability in all RHD endemic regions.
KW - 2012 WHF echocardiographic criteria
KW - performance
KW - RHD
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85193676090&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5334/gh.1327
DO - 10.5334/gh.1327
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38765776
AN - SCOPUS:85193676090
SN - 1875-4562
VL - 19
SP - 1
EP - 12
JO - Global Heart
JF - Global Heart
IS - 1
M1 - 47
ER -