The effectiveness of local child weight management programmes: An audit study

Penney Upton, Charlotte Elizabeth Taylor, Derek M. Peters, Rosie Erol, Dominic Upton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Many different child weight management programmes exist, with varying degrees of evaluation to provide evidence of their success. The purpose of this research was to use a standardized approach to audit the effectiveness of weight management intervention programmes in the West Midlands region of the UK, specifically to assess the benefits to participating children in terms of health improvement and behaviour change.

Methods: An audit of seven family-based intervention programmes currently in place in the West Midlands. Programmes were audited against the Standard Evaluation Framework.

Results: The programmes provided a partial data set relating to a change in weight from the baseline to the end of the programme; none of the programmes provided all of the measures indicated by the Standard Evaluation Form as being essential for evaluation. Weight change ranged from an increase in group mean of 0.4kg to a decrease of 0.9kg. Body Mass Index SD decreased by 0.1-0.2 points in four programmes and remained unchanged in two programmes. Four programmes collected long-term follow-up data at 6 months. This was often limited because of participant dropout. Improvement in diet and exercise were reported by participants in all programmes which measured these behaviours.

Conclusions: Ongoing evaluation of all programmes, using a standard approach, is essential in order to improve the evidence base and support future commissioning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125-133
Number of pages9
JournalChild: Care, Health and Development
Volume39
Issue number1
Early online date20 Apr 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effectiveness of local child weight management programmes: An audit study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this