The failure of the evidence of shared innovations in Cape York Peninsula

Paul Black

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    The present paper attempts to explore the evidence for shared innovations in Cape York Peninsula systematically: is there any such evidence that sheds light on subgrouping, particularly at levels where groupings are not otherwise obvious? After presenting general background, the paper first moves from north to southwest to review evidence on languages that have been grouped as Northern, Middle and Southwest Paman, and then it moves east to cover additional “initial dropping” languages and more conservative languages along the east coast. Much of this evidence is from past comparative work, but occasionally supplemented by new material. This review leads to a conclusion that the occasionally more convincing evidence for shared innovations either relates to such obvious groupings as dialects of the same language or else tends to be swamped by changes that appear to have occurred independently in differently languages and/or tend to provide conflicting evidence for subgrouping.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationAustralian Languages
    Subtitle of host publicationclassification and the comparative method
    EditorsC Bowern, H Koch
    Place of PublicationAmsterdam
    PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company
    Chapter11
    Pages241-267
    Number of pages27
    ISBN (Print)9027247617
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The failure of the evidence of shared innovations in Cape York Peninsula'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Black, P. (2004). The failure of the evidence of shared innovations in Cape York Peninsula. In C. Bowern, & H. Koch (Eds.), Australian Languages: classification and the comparative method (pp. 241-267). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.249.15bla