Abstract
There are many impediments to conserving threatened birds. Some can be overcome through concerted action across multiple species while others require species-specific research and intensive management. We assess the feasibility of managing 202 threats identified in the Action Plan for Australian Birds across 217 Australian threatened bird taxa against five metrics–financial, technical, temporal, political and social. A higher percentage of all threats to all taxa was assessed as having low or very low financial (43%), technical (32%) or temporal (29%) feasibility than political (9%) or social feasibility (7%). The feasibility of managing the most difficult threat to a taxon was low or very low for 52% of the threats identified. Within Australia, the main impediments to addressing most threats are technical and financial, indicating that research and funding should be domestic conservation priorities. Addressing threats linked to habitat destruction/degradation, climate change, invasive species and pollution is limited by the long timescales required to alleviate them, emphasising the urgency of commencing action. Outside Australia, social and political constraints are the main impediments to Australian conservation managers influencing action on habitat loss, species over-exploitation and climate change, but there are also technical, financial and temporal impediments to reducing threats from pollution, invasive species and climate change. Advocacy is therefore also important for addressing threats facing birds outside Australia. Our study provides a platform upon which to build more explicit and efficient management of threatened birds, prioritise efforts in research, funding and advocacy and contribute to reducing losses from Australia’s avifauna.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 93-107 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Emu |
Volume | 124 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was supported by the Australian Bird Environment Fund, BirdLife Australia, Charles Darwin University, Biosis Pty Ltd, New South Wales Local Land Services via the National Landcare Program 2 and Auchmeddan. The authors wish to thank the many contributors to the Action Plans for Australian Birds whose insights Form the basis for this research. Without them, feasibility scores for many taxa would be far lower.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.