The impact of detention on the social–emotional wellbeing of children seeking asylum

a comparison with community-based children

Karen Zwi, Sarah Mares, Dania Nathanson, Alvin Kuowei Tay, Derrick Silove

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Accumulating literature demonstrates that immigration detention is harmful to children. However, there is a scarcity of scientifically rigorous and reliable data about the health of children held in detention facilities. The aim of the study was to compare a community-based population of recently arrived refugee children flown into Australia, not detained, resettled in a non-urban area, with a population of children who arrived by boat seeking asylum, detained since arrival. The parent-version of the strength and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) of children aged 4–15 years was compared in children living in the community with those held in detention. We compared 86 children who had a parent-completed SDQ performed, 38 (44%) in the community group and 48 (56%) in the detention group. The community sample had been living in Australia for 325 days, with no time in detention. The detention sample had been living in detention for a mean of 221 days. The mean age was similar for the community and detention sample at 8.4 years (P = 0.18). In the total sample, children in the detention group had significantly higher SDQ total difficulties scores than children in the community group (P < 0.0001). There was no difference between age groups (P = 0.82). The children in the detention group had, on average, an SDQ total difficulties score that was 12 points higher than children in the community group. Four of the five SDQ subscale scores indicated greater disturbance amongst children in detention (< 0.0001) compared to children living in the community. The detention group had significantly higher scores (P < 0.001) for all except Pro-social scores as compared to Australian norms for the 4–6 and 7–15 years age group. This study presents a rare opportunity to compare the wellbeing of displaced children who were detained following arrival in Australia with those settled in the Australian community since arrival. The community children’s scores approximated data from the general Australian childhood population. Children held in detention had significantly more social, emotional and behavioural difficulties than children living in the community, and at levels resembling a clinical cohort. Despite the small sample size, data restrictions and other limitations of the data, statistical significance in differences between the community and detention children is marked and arguably demonstrates the negative impact of post-arrival detention in children who are presumed to have similar levels of pre-arrival adversity. If the objective is to optimise the health and wellbeing of children seeking asylum, removal of post-arrival detention is one of the most powerful interventions available to host countries.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)411-422
    Number of pages12
    JournalEuropean Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
    Volume27
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2018

    Fingerprint

    Age Groups
    Population
    Refugees
    Ships
    Emigration and Immigration
    Sample Size
    Surveys and Questionnaires
    Child Health

    Cite this

    Zwi, Karen ; Mares, Sarah ; Nathanson, Dania ; Tay, Alvin Kuowei ; Silove, Derrick. / The impact of detention on the social–emotional wellbeing of children seeking asylum : a comparison with community-based children. In: European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2018 ; Vol. 27, No. 4. pp. 411-422.
    @article{00796afa16384eb4a8afc0c42ad725b0,
    title = "The impact of detention on the social–emotional wellbeing of children seeking asylum: a comparison with community-based children",
    abstract = "Accumulating literature demonstrates that immigration detention is harmful to children. However, there is a scarcity of scientifically rigorous and reliable data about the health of children held in detention facilities. The aim of the study was to compare a community-based population of recently arrived refugee children flown into Australia, not detained, resettled in a non-urban area, with a population of children who arrived by boat seeking asylum, detained since arrival. The parent-version of the strength and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) of children aged 4–15 years was compared in children living in the community with those held in detention. We compared 86 children who had a parent-completed SDQ performed, 38 (44{\%}) in the community group and 48 (56{\%}) in the detention group. The community sample had been living in Australia for 325 days, with no time in detention. The detention sample had been living in detention for a mean of 221 days. The mean age was similar for the community and detention sample at 8.4 years (P = 0.18). In the total sample, children in the detention group had significantly higher SDQ total difficulties scores than children in the community group (P < 0.0001). There was no difference between age groups (P = 0.82). The children in the detention group had, on average, an SDQ total difficulties score that was 12 points higher than children in the community group. Four of the five SDQ subscale scores indicated greater disturbance amongst children in detention (< 0.0001) compared to children living in the community. The detention group had significantly higher scores (P < 0.001) for all except Pro-social scores as compared to Australian norms for the 4–6 and 7–15 years age group. This study presents a rare opportunity to compare the wellbeing of displaced children who were detained following arrival in Australia with those settled in the Australian community since arrival. The community children’s scores approximated data from the general Australian childhood population. Children held in detention had significantly more social, emotional and behavioural difficulties than children living in the community, and at levels resembling a clinical cohort. Despite the small sample size, data restrictions and other limitations of the data, statistical significance in differences between the community and detention children is marked and arguably demonstrates the negative impact of post-arrival detention in children who are presumed to have similar levels of pre-arrival adversity. If the objective is to optimise the health and wellbeing of children seeking asylum, removal of post-arrival detention is one of the most powerful interventions available to host countries.",
    keywords = "Asylum seeker, Children, Detention, Refugee, Social–emotional wellbeing, Strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ)",
    author = "Karen Zwi and Sarah Mares and Dania Nathanson and Tay, {Alvin Kuowei} and Derrick Silove",
    year = "2018",
    month = "4",
    doi = "10.1007/s00787-017-1082-z",
    language = "English",
    volume = "27",
    pages = "411--422",
    journal = "European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: official journal of the European Society for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry",
    issn = "1018-8827",
    publisher = "D. Steinkopff-Verlag",
    number = "4",

    }

    The impact of detention on the social–emotional wellbeing of children seeking asylum : a comparison with community-based children. / Zwi, Karen; Mares, Sarah; Nathanson, Dania; Tay, Alvin Kuowei; Silove, Derrick.

    In: European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Vol. 27, No. 4, 04.2018, p. 411-422.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The impact of detention on the social–emotional wellbeing of children seeking asylum

    T2 - a comparison with community-based children

    AU - Zwi, Karen

    AU - Mares, Sarah

    AU - Nathanson, Dania

    AU - Tay, Alvin Kuowei

    AU - Silove, Derrick

    PY - 2018/4

    Y1 - 2018/4

    N2 - Accumulating literature demonstrates that immigration detention is harmful to children. However, there is a scarcity of scientifically rigorous and reliable data about the health of children held in detention facilities. The aim of the study was to compare a community-based population of recently arrived refugee children flown into Australia, not detained, resettled in a non-urban area, with a population of children who arrived by boat seeking asylum, detained since arrival. The parent-version of the strength and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) of children aged 4–15 years was compared in children living in the community with those held in detention. We compared 86 children who had a parent-completed SDQ performed, 38 (44%) in the community group and 48 (56%) in the detention group. The community sample had been living in Australia for 325 days, with no time in detention. The detention sample had been living in detention for a mean of 221 days. The mean age was similar for the community and detention sample at 8.4 years (P = 0.18). In the total sample, children in the detention group had significantly higher SDQ total difficulties scores than children in the community group (P < 0.0001). There was no difference between age groups (P = 0.82). The children in the detention group had, on average, an SDQ total difficulties score that was 12 points higher than children in the community group. Four of the five SDQ subscale scores indicated greater disturbance amongst children in detention (< 0.0001) compared to children living in the community. The detention group had significantly higher scores (P < 0.001) for all except Pro-social scores as compared to Australian norms for the 4–6 and 7–15 years age group. This study presents a rare opportunity to compare the wellbeing of displaced children who were detained following arrival in Australia with those settled in the Australian community since arrival. The community children’s scores approximated data from the general Australian childhood population. Children held in detention had significantly more social, emotional and behavioural difficulties than children living in the community, and at levels resembling a clinical cohort. Despite the small sample size, data restrictions and other limitations of the data, statistical significance in differences between the community and detention children is marked and arguably demonstrates the negative impact of post-arrival detention in children who are presumed to have similar levels of pre-arrival adversity. If the objective is to optimise the health and wellbeing of children seeking asylum, removal of post-arrival detention is one of the most powerful interventions available to host countries.

    AB - Accumulating literature demonstrates that immigration detention is harmful to children. However, there is a scarcity of scientifically rigorous and reliable data about the health of children held in detention facilities. The aim of the study was to compare a community-based population of recently arrived refugee children flown into Australia, not detained, resettled in a non-urban area, with a population of children who arrived by boat seeking asylum, detained since arrival. The parent-version of the strength and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) of children aged 4–15 years was compared in children living in the community with those held in detention. We compared 86 children who had a parent-completed SDQ performed, 38 (44%) in the community group and 48 (56%) in the detention group. The community sample had been living in Australia for 325 days, with no time in detention. The detention sample had been living in detention for a mean of 221 days. The mean age was similar for the community and detention sample at 8.4 years (P = 0.18). In the total sample, children in the detention group had significantly higher SDQ total difficulties scores than children in the community group (P < 0.0001). There was no difference between age groups (P = 0.82). The children in the detention group had, on average, an SDQ total difficulties score that was 12 points higher than children in the community group. Four of the five SDQ subscale scores indicated greater disturbance amongst children in detention (< 0.0001) compared to children living in the community. The detention group had significantly higher scores (P < 0.001) for all except Pro-social scores as compared to Australian norms for the 4–6 and 7–15 years age group. This study presents a rare opportunity to compare the wellbeing of displaced children who were detained following arrival in Australia with those settled in the Australian community since arrival. The community children’s scores approximated data from the general Australian childhood population. Children held in detention had significantly more social, emotional and behavioural difficulties than children living in the community, and at levels resembling a clinical cohort. Despite the small sample size, data restrictions and other limitations of the data, statistical significance in differences between the community and detention children is marked and arguably demonstrates the negative impact of post-arrival detention in children who are presumed to have similar levels of pre-arrival adversity. If the objective is to optimise the health and wellbeing of children seeking asylum, removal of post-arrival detention is one of the most powerful interventions available to host countries.

    KW - Asylum seeker

    KW - Children

    KW - Detention

    KW - Refugee

    KW - Social–emotional wellbeing

    KW - Strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ)

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035149805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s00787-017-1082-z

    DO - 10.1007/s00787-017-1082-z

    M3 - Article

    VL - 27

    SP - 411

    EP - 422

    JO - European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: official journal of the European Society for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

    JF - European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: official journal of the European Society for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

    SN - 1018-8827

    IS - 4

    ER -