The need for a comprehensive reassessment of the Regional Forest Agreements in Australia

David B. Lindenmayer, David Blair, Lachlan McBurney, Sam C. Banks

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Regional Forest Agreements (RFAs) are State-Federal agreements underpinning the management of the majority of Australia's commercially productive native forests. Introduced between 1997 and 2001, they were designed to deliver certainty to forest industries while, simultaneously, guaranteeing environmental protection, including the conservation of biodiversity. Using examples, we argue that RFAs in some jurisdictions have failed to do either. We strongly recommend a comprehensive reassessment of RFAs. This is needed to: (1) take into account significant new knowledge on forest ecology and management that has been gathered in the past 20 years, including updated prognoses for some critically endangered species; (2) better evaluate the full range of wood and non-wood products and services provided by forests; (3) accommodate new methods of forest inventory and more environmentally sensitive silvicultural systems; and (4) better account for the impacts of natural disturbances, such as fires, on the area available for logging, sustained yield, and forest ecosystem integrity per se. Without a substantial overhaul of the RFAs, there is a significant risk of undervaluing the full range of native forest values, exacerbating species declines, and permanently damaging forest ecosystems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)266-270
Number of pages5
JournalPacific Conservation Biology
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Dec 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

forest ecosystem
forest inventory
need
endangered species
forest management
environmental protection
biodiversity
disturbance
forest ecology
product
forest industry
method
services
jurisdiction

Cite this

Lindenmayer, David B. ; Blair, David ; McBurney, Lachlan ; Banks, Sam C. / The need for a comprehensive reassessment of the Regional Forest Agreements in Australia. In: Pacific Conservation Biology. 2015 ; Vol. 21, No. 4. pp. 266-270.
@article{420be8c95c784ac3adce42ab4a32c478,
title = "The need for a comprehensive reassessment of the Regional Forest Agreements in Australia",
abstract = "Regional Forest Agreements (RFAs) are State-Federal agreements underpinning the management of the majority of Australia's commercially productive native forests. Introduced between 1997 and 2001, they were designed to deliver certainty to forest industries while, simultaneously, guaranteeing environmental protection, including the conservation of biodiversity. Using examples, we argue that RFAs in some jurisdictions have failed to do either. We strongly recommend a comprehensive reassessment of RFAs. This is needed to: (1) take into account significant new knowledge on forest ecology and management that has been gathered in the past 20 years, including updated prognoses for some critically endangered species; (2) better evaluate the full range of wood and non-wood products and services provided by forests; (3) accommodate new methods of forest inventory and more environmentally sensitive silvicultural systems; and (4) better account for the impacts of natural disturbances, such as fires, on the area available for logging, sustained yield, and forest ecosystem integrity per se. Without a substantial overhaul of the RFAs, there is a significant risk of undervaluing the full range of native forest values, exacerbating species declines, and permanently damaging forest ecosystems.",
keywords = "endangered ecosystems, endangered species, forest biodiversity conservation, forest management, forest policy.",
author = "Lindenmayer, {David B.} and David Blair and Lachlan McBurney and Banks, {Sam C.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1071/PC15042",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "266--270",
journal = "Pacific Conservation Biology",
issn = "1038-2097",
publisher = "Surrey Beatty & Sons",
number = "4",

}

The need for a comprehensive reassessment of the Regional Forest Agreements in Australia. / Lindenmayer, David B.; Blair, David; McBurney, Lachlan; Banks, Sam C.

In: Pacific Conservation Biology, Vol. 21, No. 4, 11.12.2015, p. 266-270.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The need for a comprehensive reassessment of the Regional Forest Agreements in Australia

AU - Lindenmayer, David B.

AU - Blair, David

AU - McBurney, Lachlan

AU - Banks, Sam C.

PY - 2015/12/11

Y1 - 2015/12/11

N2 - Regional Forest Agreements (RFAs) are State-Federal agreements underpinning the management of the majority of Australia's commercially productive native forests. Introduced between 1997 and 2001, they were designed to deliver certainty to forest industries while, simultaneously, guaranteeing environmental protection, including the conservation of biodiversity. Using examples, we argue that RFAs in some jurisdictions have failed to do either. We strongly recommend a comprehensive reassessment of RFAs. This is needed to: (1) take into account significant new knowledge on forest ecology and management that has been gathered in the past 20 years, including updated prognoses for some critically endangered species; (2) better evaluate the full range of wood and non-wood products and services provided by forests; (3) accommodate new methods of forest inventory and more environmentally sensitive silvicultural systems; and (4) better account for the impacts of natural disturbances, such as fires, on the area available for logging, sustained yield, and forest ecosystem integrity per se. Without a substantial overhaul of the RFAs, there is a significant risk of undervaluing the full range of native forest values, exacerbating species declines, and permanently damaging forest ecosystems.

AB - Regional Forest Agreements (RFAs) are State-Federal agreements underpinning the management of the majority of Australia's commercially productive native forests. Introduced between 1997 and 2001, they were designed to deliver certainty to forest industries while, simultaneously, guaranteeing environmental protection, including the conservation of biodiversity. Using examples, we argue that RFAs in some jurisdictions have failed to do either. We strongly recommend a comprehensive reassessment of RFAs. This is needed to: (1) take into account significant new knowledge on forest ecology and management that has been gathered in the past 20 years, including updated prognoses for some critically endangered species; (2) better evaluate the full range of wood and non-wood products and services provided by forests; (3) accommodate new methods of forest inventory and more environmentally sensitive silvicultural systems; and (4) better account for the impacts of natural disturbances, such as fires, on the area available for logging, sustained yield, and forest ecosystem integrity per se. Without a substantial overhaul of the RFAs, there is a significant risk of undervaluing the full range of native forest values, exacerbating species declines, and permanently damaging forest ecosystems.

KW - endangered ecosystems

KW - endangered species

KW - forest biodiversity conservation

KW - forest management

KW - forest policy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953208700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1071/PC15042

DO - 10.1071/PC15042

M3 - Review article

VL - 21

SP - 266

EP - 270

JO - Pacific Conservation Biology

JF - Pacific Conservation Biology

SN - 1038-2097

IS - 4

ER -