The positioning of Aboriginal students and their languages within Australia’s education system

A human rights perspective

Leonard A. Freeman, Bea Staley

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper is a critical review of past and present languages policies in Australian schooling. We highlight the One Literacy movement that contravenes the human rights of Australia’s Aboriginal students. This in turn impacts students’ right to freedom of opinion and expression as stated in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The One Literacy movement operates by equating Standard Australian English literacy acquisition with Australia’s global competitiveness and economic success. There is only one pathway through the Australian English curriculum with common assessments and standards. However, the Australian Curriculum provides three distinctive pathways when students from an English-speaking background learn languages other than English. We reveal this double standard, where current educational policies prioritise the languages of trade (e.g. Chinese) and accommodate speakers of these languages. Meanwhile Aboriginal-language-speaking students are not provided with the same accommodations. For educational equity, there should be a distinctive English language learner pathway that recognises that the majority of remote Aboriginal students from the Northern Territory are learning English as an additional language. We advocate for these changes because all children have a right to an appropriate education that will enable them to flourish as learners and citizens.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)174-181
    Number of pages8
    JournalInternational Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
    Volume20
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2018

    Fingerprint

    Language
    Students
    Education
    Curriculum
    Northern Territory
    Positioning
    Human Rights
    Pathway
    Education System
    Literacy
    Economics
    Learning
    Australian English
    Competitiveness
    Critical Review
    Aboriginal Languages
    Learning English
    Educational Policy
    Language Policy
    Equity

    Cite this

    @article{3d9995553ecd431abc3d2c8208b867cd,
    title = "The positioning of Aboriginal students and their languages within Australia’s education system: A human rights perspective",
    abstract = "This paper is a critical review of past and present languages policies in Australian schooling. We highlight the One Literacy movement that contravenes the human rights of Australia’s Aboriginal students. This in turn impacts students’ right to freedom of opinion and expression as stated in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The One Literacy movement operates by equating Standard Australian English literacy acquisition with Australia’s global competitiveness and economic success. There is only one pathway through the Australian English curriculum with common assessments and standards. However, the Australian Curriculum provides three distinctive pathways when students from an English-speaking background learn languages other than English. We reveal this double standard, where current educational policies prioritise the languages of trade (e.g. Chinese) and accommodate speakers of these languages. Meanwhile Aboriginal-language-speaking students are not provided with the same accommodations. For educational equity, there should be a distinctive English language learner pathway that recognises that the majority of remote Aboriginal students from the Northern Territory are learning English as an additional language. We advocate for these changes because all children have a right to an appropriate education that will enable them to flourish as learners and citizens.",
    keywords = "Aboriginal languages, Article 19, Australia, English language learner, multilingual, Standard Australian English, Universal Declaration of Human Rights",
    author = "Freeman, {Leonard A.} and Bea Staley",
    year = "2018",
    month = "1",
    day = "2",
    doi = "10.1080/17549507.2018.1406003",
    language = "English",
    volume = "20",
    pages = "174--181",
    journal = "International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology",
    issn = "1441-7049",
    publisher = "Informa Healthcare USA",
    number = "1",

    }

    The positioning of Aboriginal students and their languages within Australia’s education system : A human rights perspective. / Freeman, Leonard A.; Staley, Bea.

    In: International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Vol. 20, No. 1, 02.01.2018, p. 174-181.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The positioning of Aboriginal students and their languages within Australia’s education system

    T2 - A human rights perspective

    AU - Freeman, Leonard A.

    AU - Staley, Bea

    PY - 2018/1/2

    Y1 - 2018/1/2

    N2 - This paper is a critical review of past and present languages policies in Australian schooling. We highlight the One Literacy movement that contravenes the human rights of Australia’s Aboriginal students. This in turn impacts students’ right to freedom of opinion and expression as stated in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The One Literacy movement operates by equating Standard Australian English literacy acquisition with Australia’s global competitiveness and economic success. There is only one pathway through the Australian English curriculum with common assessments and standards. However, the Australian Curriculum provides three distinctive pathways when students from an English-speaking background learn languages other than English. We reveal this double standard, where current educational policies prioritise the languages of trade (e.g. Chinese) and accommodate speakers of these languages. Meanwhile Aboriginal-language-speaking students are not provided with the same accommodations. For educational equity, there should be a distinctive English language learner pathway that recognises that the majority of remote Aboriginal students from the Northern Territory are learning English as an additional language. We advocate for these changes because all children have a right to an appropriate education that will enable them to flourish as learners and citizens.

    AB - This paper is a critical review of past and present languages policies in Australian schooling. We highlight the One Literacy movement that contravenes the human rights of Australia’s Aboriginal students. This in turn impacts students’ right to freedom of opinion and expression as stated in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The One Literacy movement operates by equating Standard Australian English literacy acquisition with Australia’s global competitiveness and economic success. There is only one pathway through the Australian English curriculum with common assessments and standards. However, the Australian Curriculum provides three distinctive pathways when students from an English-speaking background learn languages other than English. We reveal this double standard, where current educational policies prioritise the languages of trade (e.g. Chinese) and accommodate speakers of these languages. Meanwhile Aboriginal-language-speaking students are not provided with the same accommodations. For educational equity, there should be a distinctive English language learner pathway that recognises that the majority of remote Aboriginal students from the Northern Territory are learning English as an additional language. We advocate for these changes because all children have a right to an appropriate education that will enable them to flourish as learners and citizens.

    KW - Aboriginal languages

    KW - Article 19

    KW - Australia

    KW - English language learner

    KW - multilingual

    KW - Standard Australian English

    KW - Universal Declaration of Human Rights

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042493015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/17549507.2018.1406003

    DO - 10.1080/17549507.2018.1406003

    M3 - Review article

    VL - 20

    SP - 174

    EP - 181

    JO - International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

    JF - International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

    SN - 1441-7049

    IS - 1

    ER -