The reliability of assigning individuals to cognitive states using the Mini Mental-State Examination

A population-based prospective cohort study

Riccardo Marioni, Mark Chatfield, Carol Brayne, Fiona Matthews

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Previous investigations of test re-test reliability of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) have used correlations and statistics such as Cronbach's α to assess consistency. In practice, the MMSE is usually used to group individuals into cognitive states. The reliability of this grouping (state based approach) has not been fully explored.

Methods: MMSE data were collected on a subset of 2,275 older participants (≥ 65 years) from the population-based Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study. Two measurements taken approximately two months apart were used to investigate three state-based categorisations. Descriptive statistics were used to determine how many people remained in the same cognitive group or went up or down groups. Weighted logistic regression was used to identify predictive characteristics of those who moved group.

Results: The proportion of people who remained in the same MMSE group at screen and follow-up assessment ranged from 58% to 78%. The proportion of individuals who went up one or more groups was roughly equal to the proportion that went down one or more groups; most of the change occurred when measurements were close to the cut-points. There was no consistently significant predictor for changing cognitive group.

Conclusion: A state-based approach to analysing the reliability of the MMSE provided similar results to correlation analyses. State-based models of cognitive change or individual trajectory models using raw scores need multiple waves to help overcome natural variation in MMSE scores and to help identify true cognitive change.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalBMC Medical Research Methodology
Volume11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Cohort Studies
Prospective Studies
Cognition
Population
Biomedical Research
Logistic Models
Cognitive Aging

Cite this

@article{849c15af14b64e20b11f725337c7e776,
title = "The reliability of assigning individuals to cognitive states using the Mini Mental-State Examination: A population-based prospective cohort study",
abstract = "Background: Previous investigations of test re-test reliability of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) have used correlations and statistics such as Cronbach's α to assess consistency. In practice, the MMSE is usually used to group individuals into cognitive states. The reliability of this grouping (state based approach) has not been fully explored.Methods: MMSE data were collected on a subset of 2,275 older participants (≥ 65 years) from the population-based Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study. Two measurements taken approximately two months apart were used to investigate three state-based categorisations. Descriptive statistics were used to determine how many people remained in the same cognitive group or went up or down groups. Weighted logistic regression was used to identify predictive characteristics of those who moved group.Results: The proportion of people who remained in the same MMSE group at screen and follow-up assessment ranged from 58{\%} to 78{\%}. The proportion of individuals who went up one or more groups was roughly equal to the proportion that went down one or more groups; most of the change occurred when measurements were close to the cut-points. There was no consistently significant predictor for changing cognitive group.Conclusion: A state-based approach to analysing the reliability of the MMSE provided similar results to correlation analyses. State-based models of cognitive change or individual trajectory models using raw scores need multiple waves to help overcome natural variation in MMSE scores and to help identify true cognitive change.",
author = "Riccardo Marioni and Mark Chatfield and Carol Brayne and Fiona Matthews",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2288-11-127",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "BMC Medical Research Methodology",
issn = "1471-2288",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

The reliability of assigning individuals to cognitive states using the Mini Mental-State Examination : A population-based prospective cohort study. / Marioni, Riccardo; Chatfield, Mark; Brayne, Carol; Matthews, Fiona.

In: BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 11, 2011, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The reliability of assigning individuals to cognitive states using the Mini Mental-State Examination

T2 - A population-based prospective cohort study

AU - Marioni, Riccardo

AU - Chatfield, Mark

AU - Brayne, Carol

AU - Matthews, Fiona

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Background: Previous investigations of test re-test reliability of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) have used correlations and statistics such as Cronbach's α to assess consistency. In practice, the MMSE is usually used to group individuals into cognitive states. The reliability of this grouping (state based approach) has not been fully explored.Methods: MMSE data were collected on a subset of 2,275 older participants (≥ 65 years) from the population-based Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study. Two measurements taken approximately two months apart were used to investigate three state-based categorisations. Descriptive statistics were used to determine how many people remained in the same cognitive group or went up or down groups. Weighted logistic regression was used to identify predictive characteristics of those who moved group.Results: The proportion of people who remained in the same MMSE group at screen and follow-up assessment ranged from 58% to 78%. The proportion of individuals who went up one or more groups was roughly equal to the proportion that went down one or more groups; most of the change occurred when measurements were close to the cut-points. There was no consistently significant predictor for changing cognitive group.Conclusion: A state-based approach to analysing the reliability of the MMSE provided similar results to correlation analyses. State-based models of cognitive change or individual trajectory models using raw scores need multiple waves to help overcome natural variation in MMSE scores and to help identify true cognitive change.

AB - Background: Previous investigations of test re-test reliability of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) have used correlations and statistics such as Cronbach's α to assess consistency. In practice, the MMSE is usually used to group individuals into cognitive states. The reliability of this grouping (state based approach) has not been fully explored.Methods: MMSE data were collected on a subset of 2,275 older participants (≥ 65 years) from the population-based Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study. Two measurements taken approximately two months apart were used to investigate three state-based categorisations. Descriptive statistics were used to determine how many people remained in the same cognitive group or went up or down groups. Weighted logistic regression was used to identify predictive characteristics of those who moved group.Results: The proportion of people who remained in the same MMSE group at screen and follow-up assessment ranged from 58% to 78%. The proportion of individuals who went up one or more groups was roughly equal to the proportion that went down one or more groups; most of the change occurred when measurements were close to the cut-points. There was no consistently significant predictor for changing cognitive group.Conclusion: A state-based approach to analysing the reliability of the MMSE provided similar results to correlation analyses. State-based models of cognitive change or individual trajectory models using raw scores need multiple waves to help overcome natural variation in MMSE scores and to help identify true cognitive change.

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2288-11-127

DO - 10.1186/1471-2288-11-127

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - BMC Medical Research Methodology

JF - BMC Medical Research Methodology

SN - 1471-2288

ER -