Abstract
Background: The granivorous finches of Australia's tropical savannas heavily rely on a sequence of perennial and annual grass seed production to feed throughout the year. An increase in late dry season wildfires has been suggested to detrimentally affect seed production sequence and has been attributed to poor physiological condition and a reduction in fitness of granivorous finches. Early dry season prescribed burning is an asset protection management strategy often implemented to reduce the incidence of late dry season wildfire, but has also been shown to improve the abundance and nutritional quality of grass seed
Aims: To assess whether the Gouldian finch (Chloebia gouldiae) preferentially used areas that were subject to early dry season prescribed burning over areas that were not burnt.
Methods: The creation of a landscape mosaic across the landscape with varying fire histories. Then the assessment of individual finch movement and site utilisation using VHF-radio telemetry transmitters, detected by an array of static receivers deployed across the landscape.
Key results: Finches significantly preferred to forage in areas burnt in the early season every 2-3 years.
Conclusions: The study demonstrates that early dry season prescribed burning creates preferred foraging habitat patches for Gouldian finches within savanna fire mosaics.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1277-1290 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | International Journal of Wildland Fire |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 9 |
Early online date | 3 Aug 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 3 Aug 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The research was funded by an Australian Research Council (LP1601101716) grant, with Save the Gouldian Fund, Western Australia Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, and WWF-Australia as linkage partners. Charles Darwin University provided additional support and S.J.C. was also supported by the Australian Government Research Training Program Stipend Scholarship. This study was undertaken under scientific permits from the Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife (permit no. 08-001715-2), Western Australian Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions (permit no. FO25000021), Parks and Wildlife Commission of the Northern Territory (permit no. 61442), the Australian Bird and Bat Banding Scheme (project no. 545–9), and the Charles Darwin University Animal Ethics Committee (AEC no. A17015).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 CSIRO. All rights reserved.