The use of likert scales with children

David Mellor, Kathleen A. Moore

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Objective: We investigated elementary school children's ability to use a variety of Likert response formats to respond to concrete and abstract items.

    Methods: 111 children, aged 6-13 years, responded to 2 physical tasks that required them to make objectively verifiable judgments, using a 5-point response format. Then, using 25 items, we ascertained the consistency between responses using a "gold standard" yes/no format and responses using 5-point Likert formats including numeric values, as well as word-based frequencies, similarities to self, and agreeability.

    Results: All groups responded similarly to the physical tasks. For the 25 items, the use of numbers to signify agreement yielded low concordance with the yes/no answer format across age-groups. Formats based on words provided higher, but not perfect, concordance for all groups.

    Conclusions: Researchers and clinicians need to be aware of the limited understanding that children have of Likert response formats. © 2013 The Author 2013.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)369-379
    Number of pages11
    JournalJournal of Pediatric Psychology
    Volume39
    Issue number3
    Early online date24 Oct 2013
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2014

    Fingerprint

    Aptitude
    Age Groups
    Research Personnel

    Cite this

    Mellor, David ; Moore, Kathleen A. / The use of likert scales with children. In: Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 2014 ; Vol. 39, No. 3. pp. 369-379.
    @article{bee806508a78487e987117c77627a18e,
    title = "The use of likert scales with children",
    abstract = "Objective: We investigated elementary school children's ability to use a variety of Likert response formats to respond to concrete and abstract items. Methods: 111 children, aged 6-13 years, responded to 2 physical tasks that required them to make objectively verifiable judgments, using a 5-point response format. Then, using 25 items, we ascertained the consistency between responses using a {"}gold standard{"} yes/no format and responses using 5-point Likert formats including numeric values, as well as word-based frequencies, similarities to self, and agreeability. Results: All groups responded similarly to the physical tasks. For the 25 items, the use of numbers to signify agreement yielded low concordance with the yes/no answer format across age-groups. Formats based on words provided higher, but not perfect, concordance for all groups. Conclusions: Researchers and clinicians need to be aware of the limited understanding that children have of Likert response formats. {\circledC} 2013 The Author 2013.",
    keywords = "adolescent, child, decision making, female, human, male, psychometry, questionnaire, Adolescent, Child, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Psychometrics, Questionnaires",
    author = "David Mellor and Moore, {Kathleen A.}",
    year = "2014",
    month = "4",
    doi = "10.1093/jpepsy/jst079",
    language = "English",
    volume = "39",
    pages = "369--379",
    journal = "Journal of Pediatric Psychology",
    issn = "0146-8693",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "3",

    }

    The use of likert scales with children. / Mellor, David; Moore, Kathleen A.

    In: Journal of Pediatric Psychology, Vol. 39, No. 3, 04.2014, p. 369-379.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The use of likert scales with children

    AU - Mellor, David

    AU - Moore, Kathleen A.

    PY - 2014/4

    Y1 - 2014/4

    N2 - Objective: We investigated elementary school children's ability to use a variety of Likert response formats to respond to concrete and abstract items. Methods: 111 children, aged 6-13 years, responded to 2 physical tasks that required them to make objectively verifiable judgments, using a 5-point response format. Then, using 25 items, we ascertained the consistency between responses using a "gold standard" yes/no format and responses using 5-point Likert formats including numeric values, as well as word-based frequencies, similarities to self, and agreeability. Results: All groups responded similarly to the physical tasks. For the 25 items, the use of numbers to signify agreement yielded low concordance with the yes/no answer format across age-groups. Formats based on words provided higher, but not perfect, concordance for all groups. Conclusions: Researchers and clinicians need to be aware of the limited understanding that children have of Likert response formats. © 2013 The Author 2013.

    AB - Objective: We investigated elementary school children's ability to use a variety of Likert response formats to respond to concrete and abstract items. Methods: 111 children, aged 6-13 years, responded to 2 physical tasks that required them to make objectively verifiable judgments, using a 5-point response format. Then, using 25 items, we ascertained the consistency between responses using a "gold standard" yes/no format and responses using 5-point Likert formats including numeric values, as well as word-based frequencies, similarities to self, and agreeability. Results: All groups responded similarly to the physical tasks. For the 25 items, the use of numbers to signify agreement yielded low concordance with the yes/no answer format across age-groups. Formats based on words provided higher, but not perfect, concordance for all groups. Conclusions: Researchers and clinicians need to be aware of the limited understanding that children have of Likert response formats. © 2013 The Author 2013.

    KW - adolescent

    KW - child

    KW - decision making

    KW - female

    KW - human

    KW - male

    KW - psychometry

    KW - questionnaire

    KW - Adolescent

    KW - Child

    KW - Female

    KW - Humans

    KW - Judgment

    KW - Male

    KW - Psychometrics

    KW - Questionnaires

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897012178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1093/jpepsy/jst079

    DO - 10.1093/jpepsy/jst079

    M3 - Article

    VL - 39

    SP - 369

    EP - 379

    JO - Journal of Pediatric Psychology

    JF - Journal of Pediatric Psychology

    SN - 0146-8693

    IS - 3

    ER -