Therapy for cough: where does it fall short?

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Studies on cough have come a long way but many shortfalls still exist. These shortfalls can be attributed to: the lack of randomized controlled studies with a focus on cough; studies not using robust cough outcome measures, poor definition of target groups in studies and guidelines, the lack of safe and efficacious treatments; difficulty in defining etiological factors, and the lack of data on the predictors of response to therapies for cough dominant etiologies. Addressing shortfalls in cough therapy that focuses on improving the lives of people with cough requires a systematic approach that includes better medications, high quality studies, improved multidisciplinary guidelines and education (of both health professionals and patients). To achieve new cough therapeutics requires an improved understanding of cough in humans (i.e., not just in animals). Development of new medications without substantial adverse events is long awaited for cough.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)503-513
    Number of pages11
    JournalExpert Review of Respiratory Medicine
    Volume5
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Therapy for cough: where does it fall short?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this