Tobacco manufacturer brand strategy following plain packaging in Australia

Implications for social responsibility and policy

S.J. Greenland, Lester Johnson, S. Seifi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to inform social responsibility and social policy by describing the brand strategy of Australia's largest tobacco manufacturer, British American Tobacco Australia (BATA), the year following the introduction of plain packaging and other regulation. Tobacco controls are a proven catalyst for reducing smoking, but manufacturers adapt swiftly seeking to minimise the impact of regulatory change.

Design/methodology/approach:
BATA's strategy was determined using 2012-2014 tobacco ingredient reports, recommended retail price lists and a supermarket retail audit. Findings: The research identified over 70 BATA brand variants, offered in diverse packaging options, with new products and modified names appearing since 2012. In total 14 main brands are highly differentiated by price, with 45 per cent difference between the cheapest and the most expensive. Volume discounting occurs across packaging ranges, with twin packs offering best value and prices up to 10 per cent lower than those of single packs.

Originality/value: The research originality stems from the triangulation of three different data resources to establish brand strategy following increased regulation. The study confirms ongoing market segmentation using highly differentiated ranges, and it reveals the unintended consequences of corporate responses to regulation. Evolving variant names communicate product information and imagery previously imparted by pack design. Pricing strategies enable smokers to offset substantial excise increases through brand switching and volume buying. The research, therefore, reveals the potential for regulating these as yet unrestricted elements to enhance the impact of plain packaging and other tobacco controls, thereby further reducing the social impact of smoking. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)321-334
Number of pages14
JournalSocial Responsibility Journal
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

social responsibility
nicotine
regulation
smoking
market segmentation
triangulation
audit
social effects
Social Policy
Brand strategy
Social responsibility
Packaging
Tobacco
Social policy
Values
pricing
methodology
resources
Tobacco control
Smoking

Cite this

@article{240c5e73fe6b45e2815849b80987c75e,
title = "Tobacco manufacturer brand strategy following plain packaging in Australia: Implications for social responsibility and policy",
abstract = "Purpose: This paper aims to inform social responsibility and social policy by describing the brand strategy of Australia's largest tobacco manufacturer, British American Tobacco Australia (BATA), the year following the introduction of plain packaging and other regulation. Tobacco controls are a proven catalyst for reducing smoking, but manufacturers adapt swiftly seeking to minimise the impact of regulatory change. Design/methodology/approach: BATA's strategy was determined using 2012-2014 tobacco ingredient reports, recommended retail price lists and a supermarket retail audit. Findings: The research identified over 70 BATA brand variants, offered in diverse packaging options, with new products and modified names appearing since 2012. In total 14 main brands are highly differentiated by price, with 45 per cent difference between the cheapest and the most expensive. Volume discounting occurs across packaging ranges, with twin packs offering best value and prices up to 10 per cent lower than those of single packs. Originality/value: The research originality stems from the triangulation of three different data resources to establish brand strategy following increased regulation. The study confirms ongoing market segmentation using highly differentiated ranges, and it reveals the unintended consequences of corporate responses to regulation. Evolving variant names communicate product information and imagery previously imparted by pack design. Pricing strategies enable smokers to offset substantial excise increases through brand switching and volume buying. The research, therefore, reveals the potential for regulating these as yet unrestricted elements to enhance the impact of plain packaging and other tobacco controls, thereby further reducing the social impact of smoking. {\circledC} Emerald Group Publishing Limited.",
author = "S.J. Greenland and Lester Johnson and S. Seifi",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1108/SRJ-09-2015-0127",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "321--334",
journal = "Social Responsibility Journal",
issn = "1747-1117",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Limited",
number = "2",

}

Tobacco manufacturer brand strategy following plain packaging in Australia : Implications for social responsibility and policy. / Greenland, S.J.; Johnson, Lester; Seifi, S.

In: Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2016, p. 321-334.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tobacco manufacturer brand strategy following plain packaging in Australia

T2 - Implications for social responsibility and policy

AU - Greenland, S.J.

AU - Johnson, Lester

AU - Seifi, S.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Purpose: This paper aims to inform social responsibility and social policy by describing the brand strategy of Australia's largest tobacco manufacturer, British American Tobacco Australia (BATA), the year following the introduction of plain packaging and other regulation. Tobacco controls are a proven catalyst for reducing smoking, but manufacturers adapt swiftly seeking to minimise the impact of regulatory change. Design/methodology/approach: BATA's strategy was determined using 2012-2014 tobacco ingredient reports, recommended retail price lists and a supermarket retail audit. Findings: The research identified over 70 BATA brand variants, offered in diverse packaging options, with new products and modified names appearing since 2012. In total 14 main brands are highly differentiated by price, with 45 per cent difference between the cheapest and the most expensive. Volume discounting occurs across packaging ranges, with twin packs offering best value and prices up to 10 per cent lower than those of single packs. Originality/value: The research originality stems from the triangulation of three different data resources to establish brand strategy following increased regulation. The study confirms ongoing market segmentation using highly differentiated ranges, and it reveals the unintended consequences of corporate responses to regulation. Evolving variant names communicate product information and imagery previously imparted by pack design. Pricing strategies enable smokers to offset substantial excise increases through brand switching and volume buying. The research, therefore, reveals the potential for regulating these as yet unrestricted elements to enhance the impact of plain packaging and other tobacco controls, thereby further reducing the social impact of smoking. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

AB - Purpose: This paper aims to inform social responsibility and social policy by describing the brand strategy of Australia's largest tobacco manufacturer, British American Tobacco Australia (BATA), the year following the introduction of plain packaging and other regulation. Tobacco controls are a proven catalyst for reducing smoking, but manufacturers adapt swiftly seeking to minimise the impact of regulatory change. Design/methodology/approach: BATA's strategy was determined using 2012-2014 tobacco ingredient reports, recommended retail price lists and a supermarket retail audit. Findings: The research identified over 70 BATA brand variants, offered in diverse packaging options, with new products and modified names appearing since 2012. In total 14 main brands are highly differentiated by price, with 45 per cent difference between the cheapest and the most expensive. Volume discounting occurs across packaging ranges, with twin packs offering best value and prices up to 10 per cent lower than those of single packs. Originality/value: The research originality stems from the triangulation of three different data resources to establish brand strategy following increased regulation. The study confirms ongoing market segmentation using highly differentiated ranges, and it reveals the unintended consequences of corporate responses to regulation. Evolving variant names communicate product information and imagery previously imparted by pack design. Pricing strategies enable smokers to offset substantial excise increases through brand switching and volume buying. The research, therefore, reveals the potential for regulating these as yet unrestricted elements to enhance the impact of plain packaging and other tobacco controls, thereby further reducing the social impact of smoking. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84975267420&doi=10.1108%2fSRJ-09-2015-0127&partnerID=40&md5=1fd6d4a199cd3d55ff869c6590bfd2e7

U2 - 10.1108/SRJ-09-2015-0127

DO - 10.1108/SRJ-09-2015-0127

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 321

EP - 334

JO - Social Responsibility Journal

JF - Social Responsibility Journal

SN - 1747-1117

IS - 2

ER -