‘Tough love’: The experiences of midwives giving women sterile water injections for the relief of back pain in labour

Nigel Lee; Sue Kildea; Helen Stapleton

doi:10.1016/j.midw.2017.07.016

‘Tough love’: The experiences of midwives giving women sterile water injections for the relief of back pain in labour

Nigel Lee, Sue Kildea, Helen Stapleton

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Objective: To explore midwives’ experiences of administering sterile water injections (SWI) to labouring women as analgesia for back pain in labour.

Design: A qualitative study, which generated data through semi-structured focus group interviews with midwives. Data were analysed thematically.

Setting: Two metropolitan maternity units in Queensland, Australia.

Participants: Eleven midwives who had administered SWI for back pain in labour in a randomised controlled trial.

Findings: Three major themes were identified including: i. SWI, is it an intervention?; ii. Tough love, causing pain to relieve pain; iii. The analgesic effect of SWI and impact on midwifery practice.

Key conclusions: Whilst acknowledging the potential benefits of SWI as an analgesic the midwives in this study described a dilemma between inflicting pain to relieve pain and the challenges encountered in their discussions with women when offering SWI. Midwives also faced conflict when women requested SWI in the face of institutional resistance to its use.

Implications for practice: The procedural pain associated with SWI may discourage some midwives from offering women the procedure, providing women with accurate information regarding the intensity and the brevity of the injection pain and the expected degree of analgesic would assist in discussion about SWI with women.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	80-86
Number of pages	7
Journal	Midwifery
Volume	53
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.07.016
Publication status	Published - 1 Oct 2017
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1016/j.midw.2017.07.016

Cite this

@article{9dddde35695343848315f53c17c09159,

title = "{\textquoteleft}Tough love{\textquoteright}: The experiences of midwives giving women sterile water injections for the relief of back pain in labour",

abstract = "Objective: To explore midwives{\textquoteright} experiences of administering sterile water injections (SWI) to labouring women as analgesia for back pain in labour. Design: A qualitative study, which generated data through semi-structured focus group interviews with midwives. Data were analysed thematically. Setting: Two metropolitan maternity units in Queensland, Australia. Participants: Eleven midwives who had administered SWI for back pain in labour in a randomised controlled trial. Findings: Three major themes were identified including: i. SWI, is it an intervention?; ii. Tough love, causing pain to relieve pain; iii. The analgesic effect of SWI and impact on midwifery practice. Key conclusions: Whilst acknowledging the potential benefits of SWI as an analgesic the midwives in this study described a dilemma between inflicting pain to relieve pain and the challenges encountered in their discussions with women when offering SWI. Midwives also faced conflict when women requested SWI in the face of institutional resistance to its use. Implications for practice: The procedural pain associated with SWI may discourage some midwives from offering women the procedure, providing women with accurate information regarding the intensity and the brevity of the injection pain and the expected degree of analgesic would assist in discussion about SWI with women.",

keywords = "Childbirth experience, Labour, Midwifery practice, Midwives, Procedural pain, Sterile water injections",

author = "Nigel Lee and Sue Kildea and Helen Stapleton",

year = "2017",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.midw.2017.07.016",

language = "English",

volume = "53",

pages = "80--86",

journal = "Midwifery",

issn = "0266-6138",

publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘Tough love’

T2 - The experiences of midwives giving women sterile water injections for the relief of back pain in labour

AU - Lee, Nigel

AU - Kildea, Sue

AU - Stapleton, Helen

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Objective: To explore midwives’ experiences of administering sterile water injections (SWI) to labouring women as analgesia for back pain in labour. Design: A qualitative study, which generated data through semi-structured focus group interviews with midwives. Data were analysed thematically. Setting: Two metropolitan maternity units in Queensland, Australia. Participants: Eleven midwives who had administered SWI for back pain in labour in a randomised controlled trial. Findings: Three major themes were identified including: i. SWI, is it an intervention?; ii. Tough love, causing pain to relieve pain; iii. The analgesic effect of SWI and impact on midwifery practice. Key conclusions: Whilst acknowledging the potential benefits of SWI as an analgesic the midwives in this study described a dilemma between inflicting pain to relieve pain and the challenges encountered in their discussions with women when offering SWI. Midwives also faced conflict when women requested SWI in the face of institutional resistance to its use. Implications for practice: The procedural pain associated with SWI may discourage some midwives from offering women the procedure, providing women with accurate information regarding the intensity and the brevity of the injection pain and the expected degree of analgesic would assist in discussion about SWI with women.

AB - Objective: To explore midwives’ experiences of administering sterile water injections (SWI) to labouring women as analgesia for back pain in labour. Design: A qualitative study, which generated data through semi-structured focus group interviews with midwives. Data were analysed thematically. Setting: Two metropolitan maternity units in Queensland, Australia. Participants: Eleven midwives who had administered SWI for back pain in labour in a randomised controlled trial. Findings: Three major themes were identified including: i. SWI, is it an intervention?; ii. Tough love, causing pain to relieve pain; iii. The analgesic effect of SWI and impact on midwifery practice. Key conclusions: Whilst acknowledging the potential benefits of SWI as an analgesic the midwives in this study described a dilemma between inflicting pain to relieve pain and the challenges encountered in their discussions with women when offering SWI. Midwives also faced conflict when women requested SWI in the face of institutional resistance to its use. Implications for practice: The procedural pain associated with SWI may discourage some midwives from offering women the procedure, providing women with accurate information regarding the intensity and the brevity of the injection pain and the expected degree of analgesic would assist in discussion about SWI with women.

KW - Childbirth experience

KW - Labour

KW - Midwifery practice

KW - Midwives

KW - Procedural pain

KW - Sterile water injections

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026675393&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.midw.2017.07.016

DO - 10.1016/j.midw.2017.07.016

M3 - Article

C2 - 28779643

AN - SCOPUS:85026675393

VL - 53

SP - 80

EP - 86

JO - Midwifery

JF - Midwifery

SN - 0266-6138

ER -

‘Tough love’: The experiences of midwives giving women sterile water injections for the relief of back pain in labour

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this