Towards a global list of accepted species III. Independence and stakeholder inclusion

Stijn Conix, Stephen T. Garnett, Kevin R. Thiele, Les Christidis, Peter Paul van Dijk, Olaf S. Bánki, Saroj K. Barik, John S. Buckeridge, Mark J. Costello, Donald Hobern, Paul M. Kirk, Aaron Lien, Svetlana Nikolaeva, Richard L. Pyle, Scott A. Thomson, Zhi Qiang Zhang, Frank E. Zachos

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    A global consensus list of the world’s species must be based on the best available taxonomic research, and its contents should not be biased towards certain political or social aims. At the same time, users of any global list must be involved or consulted in its establishment to ensure that the list meets their needs. This paper argues that while these two desiderata— independence and inclusion—might seem to be in conflict, they are in fact compatible. More precisely, it suggests the roles taxonomists and users could play in establishing and maintaining a global consensus list to make sure that this list is both inclusive and independent.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)631-643
    Number of pages13
    JournalOrganisms Diversity and Evolution
    Issue number4
    Early online dateJul 2021
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2021


    Dive into the research topics of 'Towards a global list of accepted species III. Independence and stakeholder inclusion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this