Transition from an open-plan to a two-cot neonatal intensive care unit

a participatory action research approach

Margaret Broom, Anne Gardner, Zsuzsoka Kecskes, Sue Kildea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Aims and objectives: To facilitate staff transition from an open-plan to a two-cot neonatal intensive care unit design.

Background: In 2012, an Australian regional neonatal intensive care unit transitioned from an open-plan to a two-cot neonatal intensive care unit design. Research has reported single- and small-room neonatal intensive care unit design may negatively impact on the distances nurses walk, reducing the time they spend providing direct neonatal care. Studies have also reported nurses feel isolated and need additional support and education in such neonatal intensive care units. Staff highlighted their concerns regarding the impact of the new design on workflow and clinical practice.

Design: A participatory action research approach.

Methods: A participatory action group titled the Change and Networking Group collaborated with staff over a four-year period (2009–2013) to facilitate the transition. The Change and Networking Group used a collaborative, cyclical process of planning, gathering data, taking action and reviewing the results to plan the next action. Data sources included meeting and workshop minutes, newsletters, feedback boards, subgroup reports and a staff satisfaction survey.

Results: The study findings include a description of (1) how the participatory action research cycles were used by the Change and Networking Group: providing examples of projects and strategies undertaken; and (2) evaluations of participatory action research methodology and Group by neonatal intensive care unit staff and Change and Networking members.

Conclusion: This study has described the benefits of using participatory action research to facilitate staff transition from an open-plan to a two-cot neonatal intensive care unit design. Participatory action research methodology enabled the inclusion of staff to find solutions to design and clinical practice questions. Future research is required to assess the long-term effect of neonatal intensive care unit design on staff workload, maintaining and supporting a skilled workforce as well as the impact of a new neonatal intensive care unit design on the neonatal intensive care unit culture.

Relevance to clinical practice: A supportive work environment for staff is critical in providing high-quality health care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1939-1948
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Nursing
Volume26
Issue number13-14
Early online date17 Aug 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health Services Research
Neonatal Intensive Care Units
Research Design
Nurses
Education
Workflow
Quality of Health Care
Information Storage and Retrieval
Workload

Cite this

Broom, Margaret ; Gardner, Anne ; Kecskes, Zsuzsoka ; Kildea, Sue. / Transition from an open-plan to a two-cot neonatal intensive care unit : a participatory action research approach. In: Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2017 ; Vol. 26, No. 13-14. pp. 1939-1948.
@article{1035e937baf9414ea5425e94e909e156,
title = "Transition from an open-plan to a two-cot neonatal intensive care unit: a participatory action research approach",
abstract = "Aims and objectives: To facilitate staff transition from an open-plan to a two-cot neonatal intensive care unit design. Background: In 2012, an Australian regional neonatal intensive care unit transitioned from an open-plan to a two-cot neonatal intensive care unit design. Research has reported single- and small-room neonatal intensive care unit design may negatively impact on the distances nurses walk, reducing the time they spend providing direct neonatal care. Studies have also reported nurses feel isolated and need additional support and education in such neonatal intensive care units. Staff highlighted their concerns regarding the impact of the new design on workflow and clinical practice. Design: A participatory action research approach. Methods: A participatory action group titled the Change and Networking Group collaborated with staff over a four-year period (2009–2013) to facilitate the transition. The Change and Networking Group used a collaborative, cyclical process of planning, gathering data, taking action and reviewing the results to plan the next action. Data sources included meeting and workshop minutes, newsletters, feedback boards, subgroup reports and a staff satisfaction survey. Results: The study findings include a description of (1) how the participatory action research cycles were used by the Change and Networking Group: providing examples of projects and strategies undertaken; and (2) evaluations of participatory action research methodology and Group by neonatal intensive care unit staff and Change and Networking members. Conclusion: This study has described the benefits of using participatory action research to facilitate staff transition from an open-plan to a two-cot neonatal intensive care unit design. Participatory action research methodology enabled the inclusion of staff to find solutions to design and clinical practice questions. Future research is required to assess the long-term effect of neonatal intensive care unit design on staff workload, maintaining and supporting a skilled workforce as well as the impact of a new neonatal intensive care unit design on the neonatal intensive care unit culture. Relevance to clinical practice: A supportive work environment for staff is critical in providing high-quality health care.",
keywords = "clinical practice, intensive care, neonatal, participatory action research, work environment",
author = "Margaret Broom and Anne Gardner and Zsuzsoka Kecskes and Sue Kildea",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jocn.13509",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "1939--1948",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Nursing",
issn = "0962-1067",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "13-14",

}

Transition from an open-plan to a two-cot neonatal intensive care unit : a participatory action research approach. / Broom, Margaret; Gardner, Anne; Kecskes, Zsuzsoka; Kildea, Sue.

In: Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol. 26, No. 13-14, 01.07.2017, p. 1939-1948.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transition from an open-plan to a two-cot neonatal intensive care unit

T2 - a participatory action research approach

AU - Broom, Margaret

AU - Gardner, Anne

AU - Kecskes, Zsuzsoka

AU - Kildea, Sue

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Aims and objectives: To facilitate staff transition from an open-plan to a two-cot neonatal intensive care unit design. Background: In 2012, an Australian regional neonatal intensive care unit transitioned from an open-plan to a two-cot neonatal intensive care unit design. Research has reported single- and small-room neonatal intensive care unit design may negatively impact on the distances nurses walk, reducing the time they spend providing direct neonatal care. Studies have also reported nurses feel isolated and need additional support and education in such neonatal intensive care units. Staff highlighted their concerns regarding the impact of the new design on workflow and clinical practice. Design: A participatory action research approach. Methods: A participatory action group titled the Change and Networking Group collaborated with staff over a four-year period (2009–2013) to facilitate the transition. The Change and Networking Group used a collaborative, cyclical process of planning, gathering data, taking action and reviewing the results to plan the next action. Data sources included meeting and workshop minutes, newsletters, feedback boards, subgroup reports and a staff satisfaction survey. Results: The study findings include a description of (1) how the participatory action research cycles were used by the Change and Networking Group: providing examples of projects and strategies undertaken; and (2) evaluations of participatory action research methodology and Group by neonatal intensive care unit staff and Change and Networking members. Conclusion: This study has described the benefits of using participatory action research to facilitate staff transition from an open-plan to a two-cot neonatal intensive care unit design. Participatory action research methodology enabled the inclusion of staff to find solutions to design and clinical practice questions. Future research is required to assess the long-term effect of neonatal intensive care unit design on staff workload, maintaining and supporting a skilled workforce as well as the impact of a new neonatal intensive care unit design on the neonatal intensive care unit culture. Relevance to clinical practice: A supportive work environment for staff is critical in providing high-quality health care.

AB - Aims and objectives: To facilitate staff transition from an open-plan to a two-cot neonatal intensive care unit design. Background: In 2012, an Australian regional neonatal intensive care unit transitioned from an open-plan to a two-cot neonatal intensive care unit design. Research has reported single- and small-room neonatal intensive care unit design may negatively impact on the distances nurses walk, reducing the time they spend providing direct neonatal care. Studies have also reported nurses feel isolated and need additional support and education in such neonatal intensive care units. Staff highlighted their concerns regarding the impact of the new design on workflow and clinical practice. Design: A participatory action research approach. Methods: A participatory action group titled the Change and Networking Group collaborated with staff over a four-year period (2009–2013) to facilitate the transition. The Change and Networking Group used a collaborative, cyclical process of planning, gathering data, taking action and reviewing the results to plan the next action. Data sources included meeting and workshop minutes, newsletters, feedback boards, subgroup reports and a staff satisfaction survey. Results: The study findings include a description of (1) how the participatory action research cycles were used by the Change and Networking Group: providing examples of projects and strategies undertaken; and (2) evaluations of participatory action research methodology and Group by neonatal intensive care unit staff and Change and Networking members. Conclusion: This study has described the benefits of using participatory action research to facilitate staff transition from an open-plan to a two-cot neonatal intensive care unit design. Participatory action research methodology enabled the inclusion of staff to find solutions to design and clinical practice questions. Future research is required to assess the long-term effect of neonatal intensive care unit design on staff workload, maintaining and supporting a skilled workforce as well as the impact of a new neonatal intensive care unit design on the neonatal intensive care unit culture. Relevance to clinical practice: A supportive work environment for staff is critical in providing high-quality health care.

KW - clinical practice

KW - intensive care

KW - neonatal

KW - participatory action research

KW - work environment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017396757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jocn.13509

DO - 10.1111/jocn.13509

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 1939

EP - 1948

JO - Journal of Clinical Nursing

JF - Journal of Clinical Nursing

SN - 0962-1067

IS - 13-14

ER -