Transplantation rates for living- but not deceased-donor kidneys vary with socioeconomic status in Australia

Blair S. Grace, Philip A. Clayton, Alan Cass, Stephen P. McDonald

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    Socioeconomic disadvantage has been linked to reduced access to kidney transplantation. To understand and address potential barriers to transplantation, we used the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry and examined primary kidney-only transplantation among adult non-Indigenous patients who commenced chronic renal replacement therapy in Australia during 2000-2010. Socioeconomic status was derived from residential postcodes using standard indices. Among the 21,190 patients who commenced renal replacement therapy, 4105 received a kidney transplant (2058 from living donors (660 preemptive) or 2047 from deceased donors) by the end of 2010. Compared with the most socioeconomic disadvantaged quartile, patients from the most advantaged quartile were more likely to receive a preemptive transplant (relative rate 1.93), and more likely to receive a living-donor kidney (adjusted subhazard ratio 1.34) after commencing dialysis. Socioeconomic status was not associated with deceased-donor transplantation. Thus, the association between socioeconomic status and living- but not deceased-donor transplantation suggests that potential donors (rather than recipients) from disadvantaged areas may face barriers to donation. Although the deceased-donor organ allocation process appears essentially equitable, it differs between Australian states.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)138-145
    Number of pages8
    JournalKidney International
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2012


    Dive into the research topics of 'Transplantation rates for living- but not deceased-donor kidneys vary with socioeconomic status in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this