Trial of a developmental screening tool in remote Australian Aboriginal communities

a cautionary tale

Anita D'Aprano, Jonathan Carapetis, Ross Andrews

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Aim: To trial the Brigance developmental screening tool as an instrument for identifying Australian Aboriginal children at risk of developmental disability and requiring diagnostic developmental assessment.

    Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of Australian Aboriginal children, aged 3-7 years, resident in three remote communities in the Northern Territory. Following informed consent, children were screened by a paediatrician using the Brigance screen.

    Results:
    There were 195 children identified as eligible, and 124 (64%) participated. All children screened, scored below the cut-off for detecting children likely to have developmental disabilities or academic delays. Furthermore, all children scored below the at-risk cut-offs that indicate high probability of disabilities in at-risk children.

    Conclusions: The Brigance screen identified all children in these high-risk Aboriginal communities as well behind their age peers. Language and cultural relevance, and the method of administration limit the use of this screening tool. However, we cannot ignore the uniformly poor performance on a mainstream tool used with children expected to succeed in a mainstream educational setting. Recommendations include adapting an appropriate instrument to guide developmental surveillance and monitoring in remote Australian Aboriginal communities. This study further supports the pressing need for quality early childhood services that address the significant risk confronting Aboriginal children and prepare them in a way that ensures school and future success. � 2010 The Authors. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health � 2010 Paediatrics and Child Health Division (Royal Australasian College of Physicians).
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)12-17
    Number of pages6
    JournalJournal of Paediatrics and Child Health
    Volume47
    Issue number1-2
    Early online date26 Oct 2010
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2011

    Fingerprint

    Developmental Disabilities
    Northern Territory
    Pediatrics
    Informed Consent
    Language
    Cross-Sectional Studies
    Physicians
    Child Health
    Pediatricians

    Cite this

    @article{9c2d75aeac5e4492840f88d317e5014b,
    title = "Trial of a developmental screening tool in remote Australian Aboriginal communities: a cautionary tale",
    abstract = "Aim: To trial the Brigance developmental screening tool as an instrument for identifying Australian Aboriginal children at risk of developmental disability and requiring diagnostic developmental assessment. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of Australian Aboriginal children, aged 3-7 years, resident in three remote communities in the Northern Territory. Following informed consent, children were screened by a paediatrician using the Brigance screen. Results: There were 195 children identified as eligible, and 124 (64{\%}) participated. All children screened, scored below the cut-off for detecting children likely to have developmental disabilities or academic delays. Furthermore, all children scored below the at-risk cut-offs that indicate high probability of disabilities in at-risk children. Conclusions: The Brigance screen identified all children in these high-risk Aboriginal communities as well behind their age peers. Language and cultural relevance, and the method of administration limit the use of this screening tool. However, we cannot ignore the uniformly poor performance on a mainstream tool used with children expected to succeed in a mainstream educational setting. Recommendations include adapting an appropriate instrument to guide developmental surveillance and monitoring in remote Australian Aboriginal communities. This study further supports the pressing need for quality early childhood services that address the significant risk confronting Aboriginal children and prepare them in a way that ensures school and future success. � 2010 The Authors. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health � 2010 Paediatrics and Child Health Division (Royal Australasian College of Physicians).",
    keywords = "Aborigine, article, Australia, Brigance developmental screening tool, child, cross-sectional study, developmental disorder, high risk population, human, informed consent, major clinical study, pediatrician, preschool child, priority journal, probability, risk assessment, screening, screening test, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Cultural Competency, Developmental Disabilities, Early Intervention (Education), Educational Status, False Positive Reactions, Humans, Mass Screening, Northern Territory, Oceanic Ancestry Group, Parents, Predictive Value of Tests, Rural Population, School Admission Criteria, Social Class",
    author = "Anita D'Aprano and Jonathan Carapetis and Ross Andrews",
    year = "2011",
    month = "1",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1440-1754.2010.01883.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "47",
    pages = "12--17",
    journal = "Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health",
    issn = "1034-4810",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "1-2",

    }

    Trial of a developmental screening tool in remote Australian Aboriginal communities : a cautionary tale. / D'Aprano, Anita; Carapetis, Jonathan; Andrews, Ross.

    In: Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, Vol. 47, No. 1-2, 01.2011, p. 12-17.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Trial of a developmental screening tool in remote Australian Aboriginal communities

    T2 - a cautionary tale

    AU - D'Aprano, Anita

    AU - Carapetis, Jonathan

    AU - Andrews, Ross

    PY - 2011/1

    Y1 - 2011/1

    N2 - Aim: To trial the Brigance developmental screening tool as an instrument for identifying Australian Aboriginal children at risk of developmental disability and requiring diagnostic developmental assessment. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of Australian Aboriginal children, aged 3-7 years, resident in three remote communities in the Northern Territory. Following informed consent, children were screened by a paediatrician using the Brigance screen. Results: There were 195 children identified as eligible, and 124 (64%) participated. All children screened, scored below the cut-off for detecting children likely to have developmental disabilities or academic delays. Furthermore, all children scored below the at-risk cut-offs that indicate high probability of disabilities in at-risk children. Conclusions: The Brigance screen identified all children in these high-risk Aboriginal communities as well behind their age peers. Language and cultural relevance, and the method of administration limit the use of this screening tool. However, we cannot ignore the uniformly poor performance on a mainstream tool used with children expected to succeed in a mainstream educational setting. Recommendations include adapting an appropriate instrument to guide developmental surveillance and monitoring in remote Australian Aboriginal communities. This study further supports the pressing need for quality early childhood services that address the significant risk confronting Aboriginal children and prepare them in a way that ensures school and future success. � 2010 The Authors. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health � 2010 Paediatrics and Child Health Division (Royal Australasian College of Physicians).

    AB - Aim: To trial the Brigance developmental screening tool as an instrument for identifying Australian Aboriginal children at risk of developmental disability and requiring diagnostic developmental assessment. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of Australian Aboriginal children, aged 3-7 years, resident in three remote communities in the Northern Territory. Following informed consent, children were screened by a paediatrician using the Brigance screen. Results: There were 195 children identified as eligible, and 124 (64%) participated. All children screened, scored below the cut-off for detecting children likely to have developmental disabilities or academic delays. Furthermore, all children scored below the at-risk cut-offs that indicate high probability of disabilities in at-risk children. Conclusions: The Brigance screen identified all children in these high-risk Aboriginal communities as well behind their age peers. Language and cultural relevance, and the method of administration limit the use of this screening tool. However, we cannot ignore the uniformly poor performance on a mainstream tool used with children expected to succeed in a mainstream educational setting. Recommendations include adapting an appropriate instrument to guide developmental surveillance and monitoring in remote Australian Aboriginal communities. This study further supports the pressing need for quality early childhood services that address the significant risk confronting Aboriginal children and prepare them in a way that ensures school and future success. � 2010 The Authors. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health � 2010 Paediatrics and Child Health Division (Royal Australasian College of Physicians).

    KW - Aborigine

    KW - article

    KW - Australia

    KW - Brigance developmental screening tool

    KW - child

    KW - cross-sectional study

    KW - developmental disorder

    KW - high risk population

    KW - human

    KW - informed consent

    KW - major clinical study

    KW - pediatrician

    KW - preschool child

    KW - priority journal

    KW - probability

    KW - risk assessment

    KW - screening

    KW - screening test

    KW - Child

    KW - Child, Preschool

    KW - Cross-Sectional Studies

    KW - Cultural Competency

    KW - Developmental Disabilities

    KW - Early Intervention (Education)

    KW - Educational Status

    KW - False Positive Reactions

    KW - Humans

    KW - Mass Screening

    KW - Northern Territory

    KW - Oceanic Ancestry Group

    KW - Parents

    KW - Predictive Value of Tests

    KW - Rural Population

    KW - School Admission Criteria

    KW - Social Class

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79251480411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2010.01883.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2010.01883.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 47

    SP - 12

    EP - 17

    JO - Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health

    JF - Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health

    SN - 1034-4810

    IS - 1-2

    ER -