Understanding innovation platform effectiveness through experiences from west and central Africa

Jocelyn Davies, Yiheyis Maru, Andy Hall, Issoufou Kollo Abdourhamane, Anselme Adegbidi, Peter Carberry, Kumuda Dorai, Stella Ama Ennin, Prince Maxwell Etwire, Larelle McMillan, Aboubakar Njoya, Souleymane Ouedraogo, Adama Traoré, Nessenindoa Julienne Traoré-Gué, Ian Watson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Innovation platforms (IPs) are a way of organizing multistakeholder interactions, marshalling ideas, people and resources to address challenges and opportunities embedded in complex settings. The approach has its roots in theories of complexity, the concept of innovation systems and practices of participatory action research. IPs have been widely adopted across Africa and beyond in recent years as a "must have" tool in a range of "for development" modes of agricultural research. Our experiences with establishing and facilitating nine IPs in local settings in west and central Africa contribute to understanding factors that impact on their effectiveness.The nine IPs were variously focused on developing dairy, crop and/or meat value chains by strengthening mixed crop-livestock production systems or seed systems. Using case study methods, we identified variables that contribute to explaining the performance of these IPs in relation to six domains of change in the agricultural system and the sustainability of changes. Thematic analysis was guided by a conceptual framework which grouped variables into four categories (context, structure, conduct, and process) that interact to influence IP performance.Stronger market connections and value chains were generated through some of these IPs but the most prevalent changes overall were in farm productivity and technical knowledge of producers. The structures evolved in some IPs, akin to those of producer collectives, suggested they were filling an institutional gap locally. The effect of the IPs on deeper level institutions that influence agricultural systems and food security was modest, constraining prospects for the IPs to generate impact at scale. Impacts from the IPs on research and development organisations were uncommon but had transformative significance.Our conceptual framework did not offer optimal guidance to understanding how the many variables that contributed to performance of these IPs combined and sequenced, but the pattern of interactions was consistent with increased social capital being the prime mediator for change. Achieving greater prospects for transformational change and impact at scale warrants at least equal attention to three other interconnected change pathways: through markets, institutions and innovation capacity. Important factors for increased impact are individuals and organisations with capacity to purposefully build and manage inter-organisational and cross-scale networks, early diagnostic studies of the institutional landscape, and adaptive processes of critical reflection and learning that continue beyond the short term.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)321-334
Number of pages14
JournalAgricultural Systems
Volume165
Early online date12 Jan 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Central Africa
supply chain
Western Africa
markets
social capital
livestock production
crops
research and development
agricultural research
food security
dairies
production technology
learning
meat
case studies
farms
seeds
methodology

Cite this

Davies, J., Maru, Y., Hall, A., Abdourhamane, I. K., Adegbidi, A., Carberry, P., ... Watson, I. (2018). Understanding innovation platform effectiveness through experiences from west and central Africa. Agricultural Systems, 165, 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.12.014
Davies, Jocelyn ; Maru, Yiheyis ; Hall, Andy ; Abdourhamane, Issoufou Kollo ; Adegbidi, Anselme ; Carberry, Peter ; Dorai, Kumuda ; Ennin, Stella Ama ; Etwire, Prince Maxwell ; McMillan, Larelle ; Njoya, Aboubakar ; Ouedraogo, Souleymane ; Traoré, Adama ; Traoré-Gué, Nessenindoa Julienne ; Watson, Ian. / Understanding innovation platform effectiveness through experiences from west and central Africa. In: Agricultural Systems. 2018 ; Vol. 165. pp. 321-334.
@article{a7b27e21ef164c87908c35b436ec928c,
title = "Understanding innovation platform effectiveness through experiences from west and central Africa",
abstract = "Innovation platforms (IPs) are a way of organizing multistakeholder interactions, marshalling ideas, people and resources to address challenges and opportunities embedded in complex settings. The approach has its roots in theories of complexity, the concept of innovation systems and practices of participatory action research. IPs have been widely adopted across Africa and beyond in recent years as a {"}must have{"} tool in a range of {"}for development{"} modes of agricultural research. Our experiences with establishing and facilitating nine IPs in local settings in west and central Africa contribute to understanding factors that impact on their effectiveness.The nine IPs were variously focused on developing dairy, crop and/or meat value chains by strengthening mixed crop-livestock production systems or seed systems. Using case study methods, we identified variables that contribute to explaining the performance of these IPs in relation to six domains of change in the agricultural system and the sustainability of changes. Thematic analysis was guided by a conceptual framework which grouped variables into four categories (context, structure, conduct, and process) that interact to influence IP performance.Stronger market connections and value chains were generated through some of these IPs but the most prevalent changes overall were in farm productivity and technical knowledge of producers. The structures evolved in some IPs, akin to those of producer collectives, suggested they were filling an institutional gap locally. The effect of the IPs on deeper level institutions that influence agricultural systems and food security was modest, constraining prospects for the IPs to generate impact at scale. Impacts from the IPs on research and development organisations were uncommon but had transformative significance.Our conceptual framework did not offer optimal guidance to understanding how the many variables that contributed to performance of these IPs combined and sequenced, but the pattern of interactions was consistent with increased social capital being the prime mediator for change. Achieving greater prospects for transformational change and impact at scale warrants at least equal attention to three other interconnected change pathways: through markets, institutions and innovation capacity. Important factors for increased impact are individuals and organisations with capacity to purposefully build and manage inter-organisational and cross-scale networks, early diagnostic studies of the institutional landscape, and adaptive processes of critical reflection and learning that continue beyond the short term.",
keywords = "Agricultural research for development, Crop-livestock integration, IAR4D, Innovation systems",
author = "Jocelyn Davies and Yiheyis Maru and Andy Hall and Abdourhamane, {Issoufou Kollo} and Anselme Adegbidi and Peter Carberry and Kumuda Dorai and Ennin, {Stella Ama} and Etwire, {Prince Maxwell} and Larelle McMillan and Aboubakar Njoya and Souleymane Ouedraogo and Adama Traor{\'e} and Traor{\'e}-Gu{\'e}, {Nessenindoa Julienne} and Ian Watson",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.agsy.2016.12.014",
language = "English",
volume = "165",
pages = "321--334",
journal = "Agricultural Systems",
issn = "0308-521X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Davies, J, Maru, Y, Hall, A, Abdourhamane, IK, Adegbidi, A, Carberry, P, Dorai, K, Ennin, SA, Etwire, PM, McMillan, L, Njoya, A, Ouedraogo, S, Traoré, A, Traoré-Gué, NJ & Watson, I 2018, 'Understanding innovation platform effectiveness through experiences from west and central Africa', Agricultural Systems, vol. 165, pp. 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.12.014

Understanding innovation platform effectiveness through experiences from west and central Africa. / Davies, Jocelyn; Maru, Yiheyis; Hall, Andy; Abdourhamane, Issoufou Kollo; Adegbidi, Anselme; Carberry, Peter; Dorai, Kumuda; Ennin, Stella Ama; Etwire, Prince Maxwell; McMillan, Larelle; Njoya, Aboubakar; Ouedraogo, Souleymane; Traoré, Adama; Traoré-Gué, Nessenindoa Julienne; Watson, Ian.

In: Agricultural Systems, Vol. 165, 09.2018, p. 321-334.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding innovation platform effectiveness through experiences from west and central Africa

AU - Davies, Jocelyn

AU - Maru, Yiheyis

AU - Hall, Andy

AU - Abdourhamane, Issoufou Kollo

AU - Adegbidi, Anselme

AU - Carberry, Peter

AU - Dorai, Kumuda

AU - Ennin, Stella Ama

AU - Etwire, Prince Maxwell

AU - McMillan, Larelle

AU - Njoya, Aboubakar

AU - Ouedraogo, Souleymane

AU - Traoré, Adama

AU - Traoré-Gué, Nessenindoa Julienne

AU - Watson, Ian

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Innovation platforms (IPs) are a way of organizing multistakeholder interactions, marshalling ideas, people and resources to address challenges and opportunities embedded in complex settings. The approach has its roots in theories of complexity, the concept of innovation systems and practices of participatory action research. IPs have been widely adopted across Africa and beyond in recent years as a "must have" tool in a range of "for development" modes of agricultural research. Our experiences with establishing and facilitating nine IPs in local settings in west and central Africa contribute to understanding factors that impact on their effectiveness.The nine IPs were variously focused on developing dairy, crop and/or meat value chains by strengthening mixed crop-livestock production systems or seed systems. Using case study methods, we identified variables that contribute to explaining the performance of these IPs in relation to six domains of change in the agricultural system and the sustainability of changes. Thematic analysis was guided by a conceptual framework which grouped variables into four categories (context, structure, conduct, and process) that interact to influence IP performance.Stronger market connections and value chains were generated through some of these IPs but the most prevalent changes overall were in farm productivity and technical knowledge of producers. The structures evolved in some IPs, akin to those of producer collectives, suggested they were filling an institutional gap locally. The effect of the IPs on deeper level institutions that influence agricultural systems and food security was modest, constraining prospects for the IPs to generate impact at scale. Impacts from the IPs on research and development organisations were uncommon but had transformative significance.Our conceptual framework did not offer optimal guidance to understanding how the many variables that contributed to performance of these IPs combined and sequenced, but the pattern of interactions was consistent with increased social capital being the prime mediator for change. Achieving greater prospects for transformational change and impact at scale warrants at least equal attention to three other interconnected change pathways: through markets, institutions and innovation capacity. Important factors for increased impact are individuals and organisations with capacity to purposefully build and manage inter-organisational and cross-scale networks, early diagnostic studies of the institutional landscape, and adaptive processes of critical reflection and learning that continue beyond the short term.

AB - Innovation platforms (IPs) are a way of organizing multistakeholder interactions, marshalling ideas, people and resources to address challenges and opportunities embedded in complex settings. The approach has its roots in theories of complexity, the concept of innovation systems and practices of participatory action research. IPs have been widely adopted across Africa and beyond in recent years as a "must have" tool in a range of "for development" modes of agricultural research. Our experiences with establishing and facilitating nine IPs in local settings in west and central Africa contribute to understanding factors that impact on their effectiveness.The nine IPs were variously focused on developing dairy, crop and/or meat value chains by strengthening mixed crop-livestock production systems or seed systems. Using case study methods, we identified variables that contribute to explaining the performance of these IPs in relation to six domains of change in the agricultural system and the sustainability of changes. Thematic analysis was guided by a conceptual framework which grouped variables into four categories (context, structure, conduct, and process) that interact to influence IP performance.Stronger market connections and value chains were generated through some of these IPs but the most prevalent changes overall were in farm productivity and technical knowledge of producers. The structures evolved in some IPs, akin to those of producer collectives, suggested they were filling an institutional gap locally. The effect of the IPs on deeper level institutions that influence agricultural systems and food security was modest, constraining prospects for the IPs to generate impact at scale. Impacts from the IPs on research and development organisations were uncommon but had transformative significance.Our conceptual framework did not offer optimal guidance to understanding how the many variables that contributed to performance of these IPs combined and sequenced, but the pattern of interactions was consistent with increased social capital being the prime mediator for change. Achieving greater prospects for transformational change and impact at scale warrants at least equal attention to three other interconnected change pathways: through markets, institutions and innovation capacity. Important factors for increased impact are individuals and organisations with capacity to purposefully build and manage inter-organisational and cross-scale networks, early diagnostic studies of the institutional landscape, and adaptive processes of critical reflection and learning that continue beyond the short term.

KW - Agricultural research for development

KW - Crop-livestock integration

KW - IAR4D

KW - Innovation systems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009483669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.12.014

DO - 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.12.014

M3 - Article

VL - 165

SP - 321

EP - 334

JO - Agricultural Systems

JF - Agricultural Systems

SN - 0308-521X

ER -