Understanding Preparedness for Natural Hazards:

A cross cultural comparison

Douglas Paton, Norio Okada, Saut Sagala

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

A key element in risk management in countries susceptible to experiencing natural hazards is facilitating preparedness. While several theories of preparedness have been developed, they have emerged in countries that are culturally individualistic. Recognition of the fact that the majority of disasters occur in countries that are predominantly collectivistic has identified a need to test the cross cultural applicability of theories of preparedness. This paper discusses some preliminary work on the cross cultural applicability of Paton’s (2008) community engagement theory. Following a discussion of the cross cultural face validity of the content of this theory, the paper discusses evidence of cross cultural applicability of the theory using data from New Zealand, Japan, Indonesia and Taiwan. The results suggest that, irrespective of culture, the more citizens are able to collectively formulate their risk management needs and strategies and the more they perceive their needs as having been met through their relationship with civic agencies, the more likely they are to trust them and the information they provide, and to use information to decide to adopt hazard preparation measures.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)18-35
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Integrated Disaster Risk Management
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

intercultural comparison
risk management
Indonesia
Taiwan
New Zealand
Japan
citizen
management
community
evidence

Cite this

@article{ea4dfe1ec73a4f7c9b9c61fbed85b229,
title = "Understanding Preparedness for Natural Hazards:: A cross cultural comparison",
abstract = "A key element in risk management in countries susceptible to experiencing natural hazards is facilitating preparedness. While several theories of preparedness have been developed, they have emerged in countries that are culturally individualistic. Recognition of the fact that the majority of disasters occur in countries that are predominantly collectivistic has identified a need to test the cross cultural applicability of theories of preparedness. This paper discusses some preliminary work on the cross cultural applicability of Paton’s (2008) community engagement theory. Following a discussion of the cross cultural face validity of the content of this theory, the paper discusses evidence of cross cultural applicability of the theory using data from New Zealand, Japan, Indonesia and Taiwan. The results suggest that, irrespective of culture, the more citizens are able to collectively formulate their risk management needs and strategies and the more they perceive their needs as having been met through their relationship with civic agencies, the more likely they are to trust them and the information they provide, and to use information to decide to adopt hazard preparation measures.",
author = "Douglas Paton and Norio Okada and Saut Sagala",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.5595/idrim.2013.0051",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "18--35",
journal = "Journal of Integrated Disaster Risk Management",
issn = "2185-8322",
number = "1",

}

Understanding Preparedness for Natural Hazards: A cross cultural comparison. / Paton, Douglas; Okada, Norio ; Sagala, Saut.

In: Journal of Integrated Disaster Risk Management, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2013, p. 18-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding Preparedness for Natural Hazards:

T2 - A cross cultural comparison

AU - Paton, Douglas

AU - Okada, Norio

AU - Sagala, Saut

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - A key element in risk management in countries susceptible to experiencing natural hazards is facilitating preparedness. While several theories of preparedness have been developed, they have emerged in countries that are culturally individualistic. Recognition of the fact that the majority of disasters occur in countries that are predominantly collectivistic has identified a need to test the cross cultural applicability of theories of preparedness. This paper discusses some preliminary work on the cross cultural applicability of Paton’s (2008) community engagement theory. Following a discussion of the cross cultural face validity of the content of this theory, the paper discusses evidence of cross cultural applicability of the theory using data from New Zealand, Japan, Indonesia and Taiwan. The results suggest that, irrespective of culture, the more citizens are able to collectively formulate their risk management needs and strategies and the more they perceive their needs as having been met through their relationship with civic agencies, the more likely they are to trust them and the information they provide, and to use information to decide to adopt hazard preparation measures.

AB - A key element in risk management in countries susceptible to experiencing natural hazards is facilitating preparedness. While several theories of preparedness have been developed, they have emerged in countries that are culturally individualistic. Recognition of the fact that the majority of disasters occur in countries that are predominantly collectivistic has identified a need to test the cross cultural applicability of theories of preparedness. This paper discusses some preliminary work on the cross cultural applicability of Paton’s (2008) community engagement theory. Following a discussion of the cross cultural face validity of the content of this theory, the paper discusses evidence of cross cultural applicability of the theory using data from New Zealand, Japan, Indonesia and Taiwan. The results suggest that, irrespective of culture, the more citizens are able to collectively formulate their risk management needs and strategies and the more they perceive their needs as having been met through their relationship with civic agencies, the more likely they are to trust them and the information they provide, and to use information to decide to adopt hazard preparation measures.

U2 - 10.5595/idrim.2013.0051

DO - 10.5595/idrim.2013.0051

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 18

EP - 35

JO - Journal of Integrated Disaster Risk Management

JF - Journal of Integrated Disaster Risk Management

SN - 2185-8322

IS - 1

ER -