Use of a variable amplicon typing scheme reveals considerable variation in the accessory genomes of isolates of Burkholderia pseudomallei

K Duangsonk, D Gal, Mark Mayo, C Hart, Bart Currie, C Winstanley

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Melioidosis, a disease caused by the bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei, is endemic in southeast Asia and northern Australia. We used suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) to identify sequences that varied between two R. pseudomallei isolates from Australia and determined the distribution of 45 SSH-derived sequences among a panel of R. pseudomallei and R. thailandensis isolates. Sequences exhibiting variable prevalence were included in a variable amplicon typing (VAT) scheme designed to score the presence or absence of 14 PCR amplicons. VAT analysis was carried out with 48 isolates from Thailand, which were typed by multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and 44 isolates from Australia of known MLST type. The VAT scheme could be used to divide the 48 isolates from Thailand into 23 VAT types and the 44 isolates from Australia into 36 VAT types. Some of the sequences included in the VAT scheme were more commonly PCR positive among isolates from Australia than among isolates from Thailand, and vice versa. No isolate from Australia was PCR positive for genomic island 11 or a putative transposase sequence, whereas four SSH-derived sequences were far more prevalent among the Australian isolates. Analysis based on the VAT scheme indicated that the isolates clustered into groups, some of which were mainly or exclusively from one geographical origin. One cluster included Australian isolates that were mostly associated with severe disease, including rare neurological melioidosis, suggesting that the content of the accessory genome may play an important role in determining the clinical manifestation of the disease. Copyright � 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1323-1334
    Number of pages12
    JournalJournal of Clinical Microbiology
    Volume44
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - 2006

      Fingerprint

    Cite this