Using realist action research for service redesign

Gillian Westhorp, K Stevens, Patricia Rogers

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    10 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This case demonstrates the integration of realist action research and co-design to address the complex social problem of long-term reliance on welfare benefits. Realist action research combines a realist philosophy of science and the questions that flow from it with an action research cycle. Realist approaches to evaluation and planning seek to explain for whom in what contexts and how impacts are generated or might be generated. Action research seeks to solve real world problems, trialling solutions until a ‘best fit’ solution is reached. The article describes the principles underpinning the methodology and the research cycles through which the project worked – situation analysis; prioritizing; co-design; trialling and further refining ideas for change. It demonstrates the development and testing of program theory for one service innovation. It also reflects on the experience and potential benefits of this approach.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)361-379
    Number of pages19
    JournalEvaluation
    Volume22
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2016

    Fingerprint

    action research
    situation analysis
    social problem
    philosophy of science
    innovation
    welfare
    planning
    methodology
    services
    evaluation
    experience

    Cite this

    Westhorp, Gillian ; Stevens, K ; Rogers, Patricia. / Using realist action research for service redesign. In: Evaluation. 2016 ; Vol. 22, No. 3. pp. 361-379.
    @article{0fedd1ff07c1454ba9ce09e15cc515c9,
    title = "Using realist action research for service redesign",
    abstract = "This case demonstrates the integration of realist action research and co-design to address the complex social problem of long-term reliance on welfare benefits. Realist action research combines a realist philosophy of science and the questions that flow from it with an action research cycle. Realist approaches to evaluation and planning seek to explain for whom in what contexts and how impacts are generated or might be generated. Action research seeks to solve real world problems, trialling solutions until a ‘best fit’ solution is reached. The article describes the principles underpinning the methodology and the research cycles through which the project worked – situation analysis; prioritizing; co-design; trialling and further refining ideas for change. It demonstrates the development and testing of program theory for one service innovation. It also reflects on the experience and potential benefits of this approach.",
    author = "Gillian Westhorp and K Stevens and Patricia Rogers",
    year = "2016",
    month = "7",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1177/1356389016656514",
    language = "English",
    volume = "22",
    pages = "361--379",
    journal = "Evaluation",
    issn = "1356-3890",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
    number = "3",

    }

    Using realist action research for service redesign. / Westhorp, Gillian; Stevens, K; Rogers, Patricia.

    In: Evaluation, Vol. 22, No. 3, 01.07.2016, p. 361-379.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Using realist action research for service redesign

    AU - Westhorp, Gillian

    AU - Stevens, K

    AU - Rogers, Patricia

    PY - 2016/7/1

    Y1 - 2016/7/1

    N2 - This case demonstrates the integration of realist action research and co-design to address the complex social problem of long-term reliance on welfare benefits. Realist action research combines a realist philosophy of science and the questions that flow from it with an action research cycle. Realist approaches to evaluation and planning seek to explain for whom in what contexts and how impacts are generated or might be generated. Action research seeks to solve real world problems, trialling solutions until a ‘best fit’ solution is reached. The article describes the principles underpinning the methodology and the research cycles through which the project worked – situation analysis; prioritizing; co-design; trialling and further refining ideas for change. It demonstrates the development and testing of program theory for one service innovation. It also reflects on the experience and potential benefits of this approach.

    AB - This case demonstrates the integration of realist action research and co-design to address the complex social problem of long-term reliance on welfare benefits. Realist action research combines a realist philosophy of science and the questions that flow from it with an action research cycle. Realist approaches to evaluation and planning seek to explain for whom in what contexts and how impacts are generated or might be generated. Action research seeks to solve real world problems, trialling solutions until a ‘best fit’ solution is reached. The article describes the principles underpinning the methodology and the research cycles through which the project worked – situation analysis; prioritizing; co-design; trialling and further refining ideas for change. It demonstrates the development and testing of program theory for one service innovation. It also reflects on the experience and potential benefits of this approach.

    U2 - 10.1177/1356389016656514

    DO - 10.1177/1356389016656514

    M3 - Article

    VL - 22

    SP - 361

    EP - 379

    JO - Evaluation

    JF - Evaluation

    SN - 1356-3890

    IS - 3

    ER -