Validation of CARE-Q in residential aged-care

Rating of importance of caring behaviours from an e-cohort sub-study

Anthony G. Tuckett, Karen Hughes, Philip J. Schluter, Cathy Turner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Aim and objective. To validate the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort questionnaire in the residential aged-care setting. Based on this determination, to conclude with what degree of confidence the questionnaire can be used to determine the ranking of the importance of caring behaviours amongst aged-care nurses and residents in residential aged-care. Background. Perceptions of caring may be context specific. Caring in residential aged-care may stand in contrast to the sense of caring understood and practiced in other settings. Design. Self-administered survey. Methods. Residents from three not-for-profit aged-care facilities, across both high-care (nursing-home) and low-care (hostel care) were surveyed relying on the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort questionnaire. A sub-sample of registered and enrolled nurses working in residential aged-care and registered with the Nurses & Midwives e-cohort study completed the same survey. Results. Although the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort questionnaire showed good internal consistency for the sample of nurses, the results for the residents were more erratic. Both groups displayed large ranges for the inter-item correlations. The results of the Mann-Whitney U-test indicated that the nurses rated the Comforts, Anticipates and Trusting relationship as significantly more important than the residents. Both groups rated the Explains and facilitates subscale as least important. All subscales, however, received median scores greater than, or equal to, six (seven-point, Likert scale) indicating that all were considered important overall. Conclusion. Based on poor Cronbach's alpha coefficients, negative inter-item correlations and qualitative observations, without further development within the residential aged-care facility the free response format version of the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort may not be an appropriate measure to use with residential aged-care residents. More research needs to be conducted into how residents and nurses are interpreting the items in the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort. Relevance to clinical practice. There will always remain a need for nurses to enact behaviours that are meaningful to residents (and patients generally).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1501-1509
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Clinical Nursing
Volume18
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Q-Sort
Cohort Studies
Nurses
Midwifery
Home Care Services
Nonparametric Statistics
Nursing Homes
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research

Cite this

Tuckett, Anthony G. ; Hughes, Karen ; Schluter, Philip J. ; Turner, Cathy. / Validation of CARE-Q in residential aged-care : Rating of importance of caring behaviours from an e-cohort sub-study. In: Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2009 ; Vol. 18, No. 10. pp. 1501-1509.
@article{464518dc6af24e9dae8e8aeee8538f4d,
title = "Validation of CARE-Q in residential aged-care: Rating of importance of caring behaviours from an e-cohort sub-study",
abstract = "Aim and objective. To validate the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort questionnaire in the residential aged-care setting. Based on this determination, to conclude with what degree of confidence the questionnaire can be used to determine the ranking of the importance of caring behaviours amongst aged-care nurses and residents in residential aged-care. Background. Perceptions of caring may be context specific. Caring in residential aged-care may stand in contrast to the sense of caring understood and practiced in other settings. Design. Self-administered survey. Methods. Residents from three not-for-profit aged-care facilities, across both high-care (nursing-home) and low-care (hostel care) were surveyed relying on the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort questionnaire. A sub-sample of registered and enrolled nurses working in residential aged-care and registered with the Nurses & Midwives e-cohort study completed the same survey. Results. Although the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort questionnaire showed good internal consistency for the sample of nurses, the results for the residents were more erratic. Both groups displayed large ranges for the inter-item correlations. The results of the Mann-Whitney U-test indicated that the nurses rated the Comforts, Anticipates and Trusting relationship as significantly more important than the residents. Both groups rated the Explains and facilitates subscale as least important. All subscales, however, received median scores greater than, or equal to, six (seven-point, Likert scale) indicating that all were considered important overall. Conclusion. Based on poor Cronbach's alpha coefficients, negative inter-item correlations and qualitative observations, without further development within the residential aged-care facility the free response format version of the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort may not be an appropriate measure to use with residential aged-care residents. More research needs to be conducted into how residents and nurses are interpreting the items in the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort. Relevance to clinical practice. There will always remain a need for nurses to enact behaviours that are meaningful to residents (and patients generally).",
keywords = "Aged-care, Care, CARE-Q, Caring, Nurses, Nursing",
author = "Tuckett, {Anthony G.} and Karen Hughes and Schluter, {Philip J.} and Cathy Turner",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02723.x",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "1501--1509",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Nursing",
issn = "0962-1067",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

Validation of CARE-Q in residential aged-care : Rating of importance of caring behaviours from an e-cohort sub-study. / Tuckett, Anthony G.; Hughes, Karen; Schluter, Philip J.; Turner, Cathy.

In: Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol. 18, No. 10, 01.05.2009, p. 1501-1509.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of CARE-Q in residential aged-care

T2 - Rating of importance of caring behaviours from an e-cohort sub-study

AU - Tuckett, Anthony G.

AU - Hughes, Karen

AU - Schluter, Philip J.

AU - Turner, Cathy

PY - 2009/5/1

Y1 - 2009/5/1

N2 - Aim and objective. To validate the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort questionnaire in the residential aged-care setting. Based on this determination, to conclude with what degree of confidence the questionnaire can be used to determine the ranking of the importance of caring behaviours amongst aged-care nurses and residents in residential aged-care. Background. Perceptions of caring may be context specific. Caring in residential aged-care may stand in contrast to the sense of caring understood and practiced in other settings. Design. Self-administered survey. Methods. Residents from three not-for-profit aged-care facilities, across both high-care (nursing-home) and low-care (hostel care) were surveyed relying on the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort questionnaire. A sub-sample of registered and enrolled nurses working in residential aged-care and registered with the Nurses & Midwives e-cohort study completed the same survey. Results. Although the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort questionnaire showed good internal consistency for the sample of nurses, the results for the residents were more erratic. Both groups displayed large ranges for the inter-item correlations. The results of the Mann-Whitney U-test indicated that the nurses rated the Comforts, Anticipates and Trusting relationship as significantly more important than the residents. Both groups rated the Explains and facilitates subscale as least important. All subscales, however, received median scores greater than, or equal to, six (seven-point, Likert scale) indicating that all were considered important overall. Conclusion. Based on poor Cronbach's alpha coefficients, negative inter-item correlations and qualitative observations, without further development within the residential aged-care facility the free response format version of the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort may not be an appropriate measure to use with residential aged-care residents. More research needs to be conducted into how residents and nurses are interpreting the items in the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort. Relevance to clinical practice. There will always remain a need for nurses to enact behaviours that are meaningful to residents (and patients generally).

AB - Aim and objective. To validate the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort questionnaire in the residential aged-care setting. Based on this determination, to conclude with what degree of confidence the questionnaire can be used to determine the ranking of the importance of caring behaviours amongst aged-care nurses and residents in residential aged-care. Background. Perceptions of caring may be context specific. Caring in residential aged-care may stand in contrast to the sense of caring understood and practiced in other settings. Design. Self-administered survey. Methods. Residents from three not-for-profit aged-care facilities, across both high-care (nursing-home) and low-care (hostel care) were surveyed relying on the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort questionnaire. A sub-sample of registered and enrolled nurses working in residential aged-care and registered with the Nurses & Midwives e-cohort study completed the same survey. Results. Although the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort questionnaire showed good internal consistency for the sample of nurses, the results for the residents were more erratic. Both groups displayed large ranges for the inter-item correlations. The results of the Mann-Whitney U-test indicated that the nurses rated the Comforts, Anticipates and Trusting relationship as significantly more important than the residents. Both groups rated the Explains and facilitates subscale as least important. All subscales, however, received median scores greater than, or equal to, six (seven-point, Likert scale) indicating that all were considered important overall. Conclusion. Based on poor Cronbach's alpha coefficients, negative inter-item correlations and qualitative observations, without further development within the residential aged-care facility the free response format version of the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort may not be an appropriate measure to use with residential aged-care residents. More research needs to be conducted into how residents and nurses are interpreting the items in the Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort. Relevance to clinical practice. There will always remain a need for nurses to enact behaviours that are meaningful to residents (and patients generally).

KW - Aged-care

KW - Care

KW - CARE-Q

KW - Caring

KW - Nurses

KW - Nursing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64549125220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02723.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02723.x

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 1501

EP - 1509

JO - Journal of Clinical Nursing

JF - Journal of Clinical Nursing

SN - 0962-1067

IS - 10

ER -