Viewing WIL in business schools through a new lens: Moving to the edge of chaos with complexity theory

Laura Rook, Lisa McManus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Employers require well rounded work-ready graduates with the skills to adapt to a contemporary workplace. Australian universities are responding to these needs through the implementation of Work-integrated Learning (WIL) programs aimed at providing students with the necessary skills, knowledge and attributes employers seek. This paper describes a study of Work-integrated Learning programs in the Human Resource Management (HRM) discipline at a number of Australian business schools. Exploratory interviews were undertaken with a range of stakeholders and examined within a complexity theory lens. The findings suggest that WIL is viewed as a threat to the role of higher education rather than an opportunity. There is increased interdependence and vulnerability within universities and as universities struggle for resources to respond to uncertainties in their ecosystem, they are being forced into making short term changes rather than co-evolving with their environment. By looking at the connectedness and evolutionary properties of the universities involved in the study, a number of recommendations are suggested to encourage universities to move to the edge of chaos, where a university’s full potential can be realized. Complexity theory provides a new way for viewing the intricacies of higher education course development and provides an argument for universities to create enabling conditions to co-evolve with the ever changing and complex world we live in.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalEmergence: Complexity and Organization
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jun 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Viewing WIL in business schools through a new lens: Moving to the edge of chaos with complexity theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this