What core primary health care services should be available to Australians living in rural and remote communities?

John Wakerman, John Humphreys, S Thomas

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    1 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background: Australians living in rural and remote areas experience poorer access to primary health care (PHC) and poorer health outcomes compared to metropolitan populations. Current health reform in Australia aims to ensure all Australians, regardless of where they live, have access to essential PHC services. However, at a national level policy makers and health planners lack an evidence-based set of core PHC services to assist in implementing this goal.

    Methods: A Delphi method was used to reach consensus on an evidence-based list of core PHC services to which all Australians should have access and their necessary support functions. Experts in rural and remote and/or Indigenous PHC, including policy-makers, academics, clinicians and consumers, were invited to consider a list of core services derived from the literature.

    Results: Thirty nine experts agreed to participate. After three survey rounds there was a strong consensus (≥80% agreement) on core PHC services namely; ‘care of the sick and injured’ , ‘mental health’ , ‘maternal/child health’ , ‘allied health’ , ‘sexual/reproductive health’ , ‘rehabilitation’ , ‘oral/dental health’ and ‘public health/illness prevention’; and on the PHC support functions of; ‘management/governance/leadership’ , ‘coordination’, ‘health infrastructure’, ‘quality systems’ , ‘data systems’ , ‘professional development’ and ‘community participation’. Themes emerging from qualitative data included challenges in providing equitable PHC in rural and remote areas, the importance of service coordination and diverse strategies to overcome access barriers.

    Conclusion: This study identifies a basket of PHC services that consumers in rural and remote communities can expect to access. It provides rigorously derived evidence that will contribute to a more systematic approach to PHC service planning and availability and will assist policy makers in the allocation of scarce resources necessary to improve the health outcomes of residents of rural and remote areas.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number143
    Pages (from-to)1-9
    Number of pages9
    JournalBMC Family Practice
    Volume15
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Rural Population
    Health Services
    Primary Health Care
    Reproductive Health
    Administrative Personnel
    Consensus
    Health
    Health Services Accessibility
    Oral Health
    Health Policy
    Information Systems
    Tooth
    Mental Health
    Rehabilitation
    Public Health

    Cite this

    @article{77bdc9f9ddf9492a8dd58dcc53513b43,
    title = "What core primary health care services should be available to Australians living in rural and remote communities?",
    abstract = "Background: Australians living in rural and remote areas experience poorer access to primary health care (PHC) and poorer health outcomes compared to metropolitan populations. Current health reform in Australia aims to ensure all Australians, regardless of where they live, have access to essential PHC services. However, at a national level policy makers and health planners lack an evidence-based set of core PHC services to assist in implementing this goal. Methods: A Delphi method was used to reach consensus on an evidence-based list of core PHC services to which all Australians should have access and their necessary support functions. Experts in rural and remote and/or Indigenous PHC, including policy-makers, academics, clinicians and consumers, were invited to consider a list of core services derived from the literature. Results: Thirty nine experts agreed to participate. After three survey rounds there was a strong consensus (≥80{\%} agreement) on core PHC services namely; ‘care of the sick and injured’ , ‘mental health’ , ‘maternal/child health’ , ‘allied health’ , ‘sexual/reproductive health’ , ‘rehabilitation’ , ‘oral/dental health’ and ‘public health/illness prevention’; and on the PHC support functions of; ‘management/governance/leadership’ , ‘coordination’, ‘health infrastructure’, ‘quality systems’ , ‘data systems’ , ‘professional development’ and ‘community participation’. Themes emerging from qualitative data included challenges in providing equitable PHC in rural and remote areas, the importance of service coordination and diverse strategies to overcome access barriers. Conclusion: This study identifies a basket of PHC services that consumers in rural and remote communities can expect to access. It provides rigorously derived evidence that will contribute to a more systematic approach to PHC service planning and availability and will assist policy makers in the allocation of scarce resources necessary to improve the health outcomes of residents of rural and remote areas.",
    author = "John Wakerman and John Humphreys and S Thomas",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1186/1471-2296-15-143",
    language = "English",
    volume = "15",
    pages = "1--9",
    journal = "BMC Family Practice",
    issn = "1471-2296",
    publisher = "BioMed Central",

    }

    What core primary health care services should be available to Australians living in rural and remote communities? / Wakerman, John; Humphreys, John; Thomas, S.

    In: BMC Family Practice, Vol. 15, 143, 2014, p. 1-9.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - What core primary health care services should be available to Australians living in rural and remote communities?

    AU - Wakerman, John

    AU - Humphreys, John

    AU - Thomas, S

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Background: Australians living in rural and remote areas experience poorer access to primary health care (PHC) and poorer health outcomes compared to metropolitan populations. Current health reform in Australia aims to ensure all Australians, regardless of where they live, have access to essential PHC services. However, at a national level policy makers and health planners lack an evidence-based set of core PHC services to assist in implementing this goal. Methods: A Delphi method was used to reach consensus on an evidence-based list of core PHC services to which all Australians should have access and their necessary support functions. Experts in rural and remote and/or Indigenous PHC, including policy-makers, academics, clinicians and consumers, were invited to consider a list of core services derived from the literature. Results: Thirty nine experts agreed to participate. After three survey rounds there was a strong consensus (≥80% agreement) on core PHC services namely; ‘care of the sick and injured’ , ‘mental health’ , ‘maternal/child health’ , ‘allied health’ , ‘sexual/reproductive health’ , ‘rehabilitation’ , ‘oral/dental health’ and ‘public health/illness prevention’; and on the PHC support functions of; ‘management/governance/leadership’ , ‘coordination’, ‘health infrastructure’, ‘quality systems’ , ‘data systems’ , ‘professional development’ and ‘community participation’. Themes emerging from qualitative data included challenges in providing equitable PHC in rural and remote areas, the importance of service coordination and diverse strategies to overcome access barriers. Conclusion: This study identifies a basket of PHC services that consumers in rural and remote communities can expect to access. It provides rigorously derived evidence that will contribute to a more systematic approach to PHC service planning and availability and will assist policy makers in the allocation of scarce resources necessary to improve the health outcomes of residents of rural and remote areas.

    AB - Background: Australians living in rural and remote areas experience poorer access to primary health care (PHC) and poorer health outcomes compared to metropolitan populations. Current health reform in Australia aims to ensure all Australians, regardless of where they live, have access to essential PHC services. However, at a national level policy makers and health planners lack an evidence-based set of core PHC services to assist in implementing this goal. Methods: A Delphi method was used to reach consensus on an evidence-based list of core PHC services to which all Australians should have access and their necessary support functions. Experts in rural and remote and/or Indigenous PHC, including policy-makers, academics, clinicians and consumers, were invited to consider a list of core services derived from the literature. Results: Thirty nine experts agreed to participate. After three survey rounds there was a strong consensus (≥80% agreement) on core PHC services namely; ‘care of the sick and injured’ , ‘mental health’ , ‘maternal/child health’ , ‘allied health’ , ‘sexual/reproductive health’ , ‘rehabilitation’ , ‘oral/dental health’ and ‘public health/illness prevention’; and on the PHC support functions of; ‘management/governance/leadership’ , ‘coordination’, ‘health infrastructure’, ‘quality systems’ , ‘data systems’ , ‘professional development’ and ‘community participation’. Themes emerging from qualitative data included challenges in providing equitable PHC in rural and remote areas, the importance of service coordination and diverse strategies to overcome access barriers. Conclusion: This study identifies a basket of PHC services that consumers in rural and remote communities can expect to access. It provides rigorously derived evidence that will contribute to a more systematic approach to PHC service planning and availability and will assist policy makers in the allocation of scarce resources necessary to improve the health outcomes of residents of rural and remote areas.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908447533&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1186/1471-2296-15-143

    DO - 10.1186/1471-2296-15-143

    M3 - Article

    VL - 15

    SP - 1

    EP - 9

    JO - BMC Family Practice

    JF - BMC Family Practice

    SN - 1471-2296

    M1 - 143

    ER -