TY - JOUR
T1 - What is multidisciplinary cancer care like in practice?
T2 - A protocol for a mixed-method study to characterise ambulatory oncology services in the Australian public sector
AU - Nic Giolla Easpaig, Bróna
AU - Arnolda, Gaston
AU - Tran, Yvonne
AU - Bierbaum, Mia
AU - Lamprell, Klay
AU - Delaney, Geoffrey P.
AU - Liauw, Winston
AU - Chittajallu, Renuka
AU - Winata, Teresa
AU - Ward, Robyn L.
AU - Currow, David C.
AU - Olver, Ian
AU - Karnon, Jonathan
AU - Westbrook, Johanna
AU - Braithwaite, Jeffrey
N1 - Funding Information:
Contributors JB, GPD, WL, RLW, DCC, IO, JK and JW led the conceptualisation of the work and the development of the design was led by JB, GPD, WL, GA, BNGE, YT, MB, KL, RC and TW. With guidance from the other authors, BNGE wrote the first draft and all authors contributed to revising key content to develop the final version. All authors have seen and approved of the final manuscript. Funding JB receives funding to support this work from NHMRC grants APP9100002 and APP1135048.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Author(s).
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/10/1
Y1 - 2019/10/1
N2 - Introduction An understanding of the real-world provision of oncology outpatient services can help maintain service quality in the face of escalating demand and tight budgets, by informing the design of interventions that improve the effectiveness or efficiency of provision. The aims of this study are threefold. First, to develop an understanding of cancer services in outpatient clinics by characterising the organisation and practice of multidisciplinary care (MDC). Second, to explore the key areas of: (a) clinical decision-making and (b) engagement with patients' supportive needs. Third, to identify barriers to, and facilitators of, the delivery of quality care in these settings. Methods and analysis A suite of mixed-methods studies will be implemented at six hospitals providing cancer outpatient clinics, with a staged roll-out. In Stage One, we will examine policies, use unstructured observations and undertake interviews with key health professionals to characterise the organisation and delivery of MDC. In Stage Two, observations of practice will continue, to deepen our understanding, and to inform two focused studies. The first will explore decision-making practices and the second will examine how staff engage with patients' needs; both studies involve interviews, to complement observation. As part of the study of supportive care, we will examine the implications of an introduction of patient-reported measures (PRMs) into care, adding surveys to interviews before and after PRMs roll-out. Data analysis will account for site-specific and cross-site issues using an adapted Qualitative Rapid Appraisal, Rigorous Analysis approach. Quantitative data from clinician surveys will be statistically analysed and triangulated with the related qualitative study findings. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was granted by South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (no. 18/207). Findings will be shared with participating hospitals and widely disseminated through publications and presentations.
AB - Introduction An understanding of the real-world provision of oncology outpatient services can help maintain service quality in the face of escalating demand and tight budgets, by informing the design of interventions that improve the effectiveness or efficiency of provision. The aims of this study are threefold. First, to develop an understanding of cancer services in outpatient clinics by characterising the organisation and practice of multidisciplinary care (MDC). Second, to explore the key areas of: (a) clinical decision-making and (b) engagement with patients' supportive needs. Third, to identify barriers to, and facilitators of, the delivery of quality care in these settings. Methods and analysis A suite of mixed-methods studies will be implemented at six hospitals providing cancer outpatient clinics, with a staged roll-out. In Stage One, we will examine policies, use unstructured observations and undertake interviews with key health professionals to characterise the organisation and delivery of MDC. In Stage Two, observations of practice will continue, to deepen our understanding, and to inform two focused studies. The first will explore decision-making practices and the second will examine how staff engage with patients' needs; both studies involve interviews, to complement observation. As part of the study of supportive care, we will examine the implications of an introduction of patient-reported measures (PRMs) into care, adding surveys to interviews before and after PRMs roll-out. Data analysis will account for site-specific and cross-site issues using an adapted Qualitative Rapid Appraisal, Rigorous Analysis approach. Quantitative data from clinician surveys will be statistically analysed and triangulated with the related qualitative study findings. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was granted by South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (no. 18/207). Findings will be shared with participating hospitals and widely disseminated through publications and presentations.
KW - cancer
KW - multi-site
KW - oncology
KW - outpatient clinic
KW - qualitative research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073103776&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031179
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031179
M3 - Article
C2 - 31601594
AN - SCOPUS:85073103776
VL - 9
SP - 1
EP - 10
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
SN - 2044-6055
IS - 10
M1 - e031179
ER -